RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2012, 11:00 AM   #1
LawFive
Member
 
LawFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eastern Suburbia
Posts: 533
Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

So its looking more and more like the Reds will be forced to throw Leake today...their #5 SP who, with the exception of one outing this year, has thrown mostly batting practice against the Giants.

Realizing that hindsight is 20/20...after Cueto's early departure in Game 1, should Dusty have gone ahead and just used LeCure/Simon/Hoover to get thru, no matter the results? That way they could have taken their chances with Arroyo in game 2 and Latos in game 3 as planned....leaving them with Bailey in game 4 and back to a rested Arroyo in game 5 if necessary.

Perception was that the Reds would be set up well if they could take at least 1 in SF...by burning Latos early sure they ended up taking 1 and 2, but now are left with question marks and guys on short rest to capture that elusive third win.
__________________
The seven most magic words in all the land...
"If, in the opinion of the referee,..."
LawFive is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 10-10-2012, 11:03 AM   #2
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,301
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

No. It was handled perfectly if you ask me.
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:04 AM   #3
Reds/Flyers Fan
Member
 
Reds/Flyers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cincinnati USA
Posts: 3,319
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

No.

They were handed a 1-hitter last night by Homer Bailey on a silver platter and they didn't take advantage. This series should be over.
Reds/Flyers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:04 AM   #4
oneupper
Danger is my business!
 
oneupper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Back in Florida
Posts: 7,842
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Dusty did fine. Taking that first game on the road was crucial. Note that Latos didn't enter the game until they were up in the score.
__________________
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

http://dalmady.blogspot.com
oneupper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:05 AM   #5
oregonred
"So Fla Red"
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Florida - The Real Humidor
Posts: 4,470
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Nope. Took some bad luck and a complete lack of offense in innings 2-10 to lose last night. Any offense whatsover and dominant Homer would be the toast of the town this morning.

Not walking Arias is the one that smarts. Would have taken out Romo, used up the last Giants position playr, setup a force at any base and forced the Giants to use Lincecum last night (making him unavailable for Game 4).

Baker played Saturday night perfectly.

Ironic that a team that made 161 starts is left scrambling for a 5th starter in the 4th game of a series. That's why baseball is so maddening but incredible to watch the ebbs and flows of a playoff series.
oregonred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:05 AM   #6
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,905
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

In hindsight, knowing we took Game 2, I think the instinct is to say yes. However, most of us were assuming a loss in Game 2 at the time.

In the playoffs, you don't punt. Wins are simply too valuable. Too much can happen in the future. We're still going to get a regular start out of Latos, if needed. The net impact of the decision was trading a 2nd Arroyo start for a Leake start, which isn't that big of a step down.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:06 AM   #7
Reds Fanatic
Member
 
Reds Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

No way you don't ever give away trying to win a game.

They lost a game they could have won last night. It just bad luck what happened with Cueto but you deal with it.
Reds Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:07 AM   #8
redsfan30
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,545
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Why in God's Holy Name would you ever punt a Playoff game?????
__________________
"Strickland Propane... Taste the meat, not the heat." - Hank Hill
redsfan30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:07 AM   #9
cumberlandreds
Member
 
cumberlandreds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,826
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

No you never punt a playoff game. Never. Ever.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971
cumberlandreds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:11 AM   #10
Jefferson24
Plan to be spontaneous
 
Jefferson24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinios
Posts: 1,178
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

If you punt game 1 and end up losing game 2 then you look like a chump. We still got 2 chances, if the Reds hit like they are capable then we should at least win one of those, if not we lose. This series is going to be decided by the bats not the arms.
__________________
We only live in patches. - H. G. Wells
Jefferson24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:12 AM   #11
hebroncougar
Member
 
hebroncougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,015
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LawFive View Post
So its looking more and more like the Reds will be forced to throw Leake today...their #5 SP who, with the exception of one outing this year, has thrown mostly batting practice against the Giants.

Realizing that hindsight is 20/20...after Cueto's early departure in Game 1, should Dusty have gone ahead and just used LeCure/Simon/Hoover to get thru, no matter the results? That way they could have taken their chances with Arroyo in game 2 and Latos in game 3 as planned....leaving them with Bailey in game 4 and back to a rested Arroyo in game 5 if necessary.

Perception was that the Reds would be set up well if they could take at least 1 in SF...by burning Latos early sure they ended up taking 1 and 2, but now are left with question marks and guys on short rest to capture that elusive third win.
Yeah. Punt one of the games we won.
hebroncougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:13 AM   #12
Tom Servo
thirsty and miserable
 
Tom Servo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,382
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cumberlandreds View Post
No you never punt a playoff game. Never. Ever.
This.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement."
Tom Servo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:18 AM   #13
LawFive
Member
 
LawFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eastern Suburbia
Posts: 533
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Like I said, the question only arises in hindsight. Time yields clarity of vision. And at the time, I was on board with the move as well...but now it appears the Reds may have used their best sprinters at the beginning of the relay, and have only a JV player left to finish. True there is a game 5 and Latos will be throwing, but now an entire summer of fun and excellence is likely going to come down to a one game coin flip.
__________________
The seven most magic words in all the land...
"If, in the opinion of the referee,..."
LawFive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:19 AM   #14
AtomicDumpling
KungFu Fighter
 
AtomicDumpling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 2,292
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LawFive View Post
So its looking more and more like the Reds will be forced to throw Leake today...their #5 SP who, with the exception of one outing this year, has thrown mostly batting practice against the Giants.

Realizing that hindsight is 20/20...after Cueto's early departure in Game 1, should Dusty have gone ahead and just used LeCure/Simon/Hoover to get thru, no matter the results? That way they could have taken their chances with Arroyo in game 2 and Latos in game 3 as planned....leaving them with Bailey in game 4 and back to a rested Arroyo in game 5 if necessary.

Perception was that the Reds would be set up well if they could take at least 1 in SF...by burning Latos early sure they ended up taking 1 and 2, but now are left with question marks and guys on short rest to capture that elusive third win.
I would never punt a game. LeCure, Simon and Hoover are all good pitchers though, so using them in game 1 could very well have resulted in a win. I wouldn't call that a punting strategy.
AtomicDumpling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:20 AM   #15
lollipopcurve
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,477
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Second-guessing at its best.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini
lollipopcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25