![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,431
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
So we'd rather be a loss away from elimination right now just so Latos could be ready to go? This dude's got stronger nerves than me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
If Dusty had decided to punt who would have been his punter? Leake? He looks like a kicker to me.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,648
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
It seems to be the best option to me. The alternatives are short rest Arroyo or Leake if a game 5. Neither of those I like when I know Cain is pitching Game 5 for them and it might be another game like game 3, as in whose bullpen blinks first.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
"So Fla Red"
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Florida - The Real Humidor
Posts: 4,470
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
Oh yeah, tell that to my poor remote, freshly repaired from the Bungles debacle on Sunday and in need of more duct tape after the 10 inning series of flukey events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
I wish I could say something strong enough to convey exactly how ludicrous I find this idea right now but I'm just too dumbfounded to say much of anything.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Resident optimist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east of WOY
Posts: 5,029
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
Well, in a way it was a punt. The ball was downed at the 1 and the Giants have to go the length of the field with about 1:15 left.
__________________
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball. Cincinnati's premiere expedited trucking company |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
KungFu Fighter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 2,330
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
I think people are seeing the word "punt" in the thread title and thinking that means the OP actually suggested the Reds should have intentionally lost the first game. If you read his post you will see that he never said that...
I think Price and Dusty handled the situation just fine in that game and it worked out well. But I don't think using LeCure, Simon and Hoover instead of LeCure and Latos would have automatically resulted in a loss or a "punt". The Reds likely would have won the game either way since they scored 5 runs. Latos only pitched four innings after all. If the Reds had used Simon and Hoover for those four innings instead of Latos they would not have given up 4+ runs. The Reds would have won the game either way . |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 540
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
Quote:
Or, he could have saved some of the 9 runs from Game 2 and applied them to Game 3. Sometimes I don't know what he's thinking, either of those moves would have us in the NLCS in a flash. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
I played a lot of NCAA football for the PS2 in college.
Rule #1: NEVER PUNT.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
And why is that? Because you only have a few possessions and punting doesn't put the other team at nearly enough of a disadvantage (or your team at an advantage in subsequent possessions) to offset your guarenteed lost possession. Same logic applies
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,931
|
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?
Is this a real question?
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |