RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2012, 12:46 PM   #31
Superdude
Member
 
Superdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,431
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

So we'd rather be a loss away from elimination right now just so Latos could be ready to go? This dude's got stronger nerves than me.
Superdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 10-10-2012, 12:58 PM   #32
cumberlandreds
Member
 
cumberlandreds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,847
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

If Dusty had decided to punt who would have been his punter? Leake? He looks like a kicker to me.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971
cumberlandreds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 01:00 PM   #33
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,648
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superdude View Post
So we'd rather be a loss away from elimination right now just so Latos could be ready to go? This dude's got stronger nerves than me.
It seems to be the best option to me. The alternatives are short rest Arroyo or Leake if a game 5. Neither of those I like when I know Cain is pitching Game 5 for them and it might be another game like game 3, as in whose bullpen blinks first.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em
traderumor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 01:06 PM   #34
oregonred
"So Fla Red"
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Florida - The Real Humidor
Posts: 4,470
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
New terrain I suppose.

Youth of Redsland listen to me.

ENJOY THIS IT'S A GAME YOU CANNOT CONTROL

GIVE IN TO THE GAME
Oh yeah, tell that to my poor remote, freshly repaired from the Bungles debacle on Sunday and in need of more duct tape after the 10 inning series of flukey events.
oregonred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 01:33 PM   #35
Joseph
Tired of talk. Win!
 
Joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

I wish I could say something strong enough to convey exactly how ludicrous I find this idea right now but I'm just too dumbfounded to say much of anything.
__________________

Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
Chicago Blackhawks - 10
University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
Cincinnati Bengals - None
Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98
Joseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 01:40 PM   #36
OldRightHander
Resident optimist
 
OldRightHander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east of WOY
Posts: 5,029
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cumberlandreds View Post
If Dusty had decided to punt who would have been his punter? Leake? He looks like a kicker to me.
Well, in a way it was a punt. The ball was downed at the 1 and the Giants have to go the length of the field with about 1:15 left.
__________________
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball.

Cincinnati's premiere expedited trucking company
OldRightHander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 01:42 PM   #37
AtomicDumpling
KungFu Fighter
 
AtomicDumpling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 2,330
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

I think people are seeing the word "punt" in the thread title and thinking that means the OP actually suggested the Reds should have intentionally lost the first game. If you read his post you will see that he never said that...

I think Price and Dusty handled the situation just fine in that game and it worked out well. But I don't think using LeCure, Simon and Hoover instead of LeCure and Latos would have automatically resulted in a loss or a "punt". The Reds likely would have won the game either way since they scored 5 runs. Latos only pitched four innings after all. If the Reds had used Simon and Hoover for those four innings instead of Latos they would not have given up 4+ runs. The Reds would have won the game either way .
AtomicDumpling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 03:54 PM   #38
redssince75
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 540
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
I think Dusty should have saved Bailey's one hitter for today.
Yes, he should have punted last night and had Homer throw a gem today.

Or, he could have saved some of the 9 runs from Game 2 and applied them to Game 3.

Sometimes I don't know what he's thinking, either of those moves would have us in the NLCS in a flash.
redssince75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 03:58 PM   #39
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

I played a lot of NCAA football for the PS2 in college.

Rule #1: NEVER PUNT.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 05:43 PM   #40
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveat Emperor View Post
I played a lot of NCAA football for the PS2 in college.

Rule #1: NEVER PUNT.
And why is that? Because you only have a few possessions and punting doesn't put the other team at nearly enough of a disadvantage (or your team at an advantage in subsequent possessions) to offset your guarenteed lost possession. Same logic applies
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 06:43 PM   #41
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,931
Re: Should Dusty have punted Game 1?

Is this a real question?
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25