RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2012, 07:38 PM   #31
mattfeet
Moderator
 
mattfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,373
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Quote:
Originally Posted by camisadelgolf View Post
Hypothetically, let's say this trade ends up helping the Marlins become winners. Are people still going to hate on Loria?
Absolutely. It's not the fact that he MADE the trade, but it's WHY he made the trade. No one scorned A's ownership last year when they traded away 3 All-Star pitchers but they also didn't sign them to $100MM+ 9 months prior. Loria tried to buy a World Series ring, failed miserably, and is now trying to get out of the contracts owed, effectively killing baseball in Miami.

Regardless of if Miami becomes a contender or not, this trade was made for one reason only.
mattfeet is online now   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-13-2012, 07:38 PM   #32
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,713
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Buerhle and Reyes, due to their production and contracts, have negative trade value.

I wouldn't take them off waivers for free.

Johnson is the cost of dumping those contracts.
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:42 PM   #33
Wonderful Monds
Member
 
Wonderful Monds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
Buerhle and Reyes, due to their production and contracts, have negative trade value.

I wouldn't take them off waivers for free.

Johnson is the cost of dumping those contracts.
Buehrle, sure. Reyes? Ehhh...
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.
Wonderful Monds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:47 PM   #34
Patrick Bateman
One and a half men
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,459
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
Buerhle and Reyes, due to their production and contracts, have negative trade value.

I wouldn't take them off waivers for free.

Johnson is the cost of dumping those contracts.
Reyes does not have negative trade value.

Even Buerhle is being paid market rates.

At some point you need to add value to the major league team, which can often be hard for a non-preferred baseball destination like Toronto. The Blue Jays are massively better today than they were yesterday, by a very large margin, and if they have the payroll capacity that this does not limit their ability to keep young talent, then i really like it for the Jays.
Patrick Bateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:48 PM   #35
Tom Servo
thirsty and miserable
 
Tom Servo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,402
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
Buerhle and Reyes, due to their production and contracts, have negative trade value.

I wouldn't take them off waivers for free.

Johnson is the cost of dumping those contracts.
I mean the back end of the numbers on Buehrle's contract aren't pretty, but the guy has been a model of consistency for years now even when the predictions persist that he's going to fall off a cliff. I think he's a fine addition to a decimated Toronto rotation and in a market where Anibal Sanchez may get $100 million, not cripplingly expensive.

Reyes' contract is worse, but it seems as though there were more than a few interested suitors at the trade deadline.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement."
Tom Servo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:49 PM   #36
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,713
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
Buehrle, sure. Reyes? Ehhh...
2.8 WAR and a 6 year $106M contract. And he's likley to get worse as he ages.

Unless I have a Yankees type budget, I'd stay far away.
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:53 PM   #37
sonny
You're being very UnDude.
 
sonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,575
Well, at least they have awesome uniforms, an attractive stadium and throngs of adoring fans. So there's that.
__________________
Witty signature.
sonny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:53 PM   #38
Wonderful Monds
Member
 
Wonderful Monds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
2.8 WAR and a 6 year $106M contract. And he's likley to get worse as he ages.

Unless I have a Yankees type budget, I'd stay far away.
Is that number for Reyes? Because the last time I'm seeing his value that low is 2010, and it's been well over that for the rest of his career.
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.
Wonderful Monds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:54 PM   #39
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,713
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Bateman View Post
Reyes does not have negative trade value.

Even Buerhle is being paid market rates.

At some point you need to add value to the major league team, which can often be hard for a non-preferred baseball destination like Toronto. The Blue Jays are massively better today than they were yesterday, by a very large margin, and if they have the payroll capacity that this does not limit their ability to keep young talent, then i really like it for the Jays.
Oh I don't disagree that the Blue Jays are a better team today then yesterday.

But taking this much salary on can only be judged in a few years when it can be determined if the extra salaries have prevented the team from keeping cheaper and better talent.

I also thing both players are likely to regress pretty quickly.
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:55 PM   #40
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,713
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
Is that number for Reyes? Because the last time I'm seeing his value that low is 2010, and it's been well over that for the rest of his career.
According to Baseball Reference it is. I understand it can be different on other sites.
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:56 PM   #41
Patrick Bateman
One and a half men
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,459
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
2.8 WAR and a 6 year $106M contract. And he's likley to get worse as he ages.

Unless I have a Yankees type budget, I'd stay far away.
1. Reyes had 4.5 WAR

2. The year before that he had 6

3. It looks like he's healthy. If he is he should keep being productive. He has real offensive ability, and his defense shouldn't completely fall off the cliff (I think he's more Jimmy Rollins type).

4. 17.5M doesn't get you that much on the open market. Jose Reyes would get just a good a contract right now. Look what Brandon Phillips got.

5. Anyways should be able to look beyond WAR. He's 29. He can play SS adequately. He's a strong offensive threat. There are what, 5 other guys in the majors who can do that?
Patrick Bateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:58 PM   #42
Patrick Bateman
One and a half men
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,459
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
Oh I don't disagree that the Blue Jays are a better team today then yesterday.

But taking this much salary on can only be judged in a few years when it can be determined if the extra salaries have prevented the team from keeping cheaper and better talent.

I also thing both players are likely to regress pretty quickly.
They only have Reyes until he is 34/35. You aren't really going to be able to lock up a star to more ideal age years.

I'd consider him as about as good a free agent get (dollars, age, and production) as you are going to get.

After seeing the contracts the Dodgers took on (and gave away prospects), the Jays got better players for a similar price.
Patrick Bateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:58 PM   #43
_Sir_Charles_
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
 
_Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,376
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

Interesting tidbit....

Quote:
Guillen's replacement, Mike Redmond, most recently managed the Blue Jays' Class A Advanced team in Dunedin, Fla., last year and should be familiar with most of the prospects Toronto is sending to Miami.
__________________

_Sir_Charles_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:59 PM   #44
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,713
Re: Blue Jays Acquiring J.Johnson and M.Buerhle

no message
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 08:00 PM   #45
Wonderful Monds
Member
 
Wonderful Monds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,387
So how many more times can these mega deals keep happening? There have been 2 unprecedented, enormous trades like this just in the past few months.
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.
Wonderful Monds is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25