RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2012, 02:41 PM   #1
Wonderful Monds
Member
 
Wonderful Monds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,400
RA Dickey

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/1...in-trades.html

They have stated they want OF and catcher help. I don't think we can match up there, but honestly if they want an OF, I imagine they can get one of the many from FA.

Can't really think of a parallel to this. He's an old pitcher, 1 year before FA. But he's a knuckler. He could conceivably stay good for a while.
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.
Wonderful Monds is online now   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-08-2012, 02:47 PM   #2
mattfeet
Moderator
 
mattfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,382
Re: RA Dickey

I think the Mets caught lightning in a bottle. Pass.
mattfeet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:48 PM   #3
Vottomatic
All work and no play.....
 
Vottomatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,847
Re: RA Dickey

Dickey and Wright for Stubbs, Heisey, Paul, and any other junk they want. LOL. That's usually the kind of return fans consider.

The more I think about it, because of payroll limits, the Reds won't do anything this offseason.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

"Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread
Vottomatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:52 PM   #4
Wonderful Monds
Member
 
Wonderful Monds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,400
Re: RA Dickey

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattfeet View Post
I think the Mets caught lightning in a bottle. Pass.
He's been good for a while now though (though not that good.)

I just don't know if a strikeout rate like that happens by accident.
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.
Wonderful Monds is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:54 PM   #5
Johnny Footstool
Churlish
 
Johnny Footstool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,670
Re: RA Dickey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vottomatic View Post
Dickey and Wright for Stubbs, Heisey, Paul, and any other junk they want. LOL. That's usually the kind of return fans consider.

The more I think about it, because of payroll limits, the Reds won't do anything this offseason.
Would the Reds trade Joey Votto and Bronson Arroyo for the likes of Stubbs, Heisey, Paul, and "other junk?"

No.

David Wright is the Mets' Joey Votto. It's wildly unrealistic to propose that they would accept three guys off the Reds' stinkpile for him.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful
Johnny Footstool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:57 PM   #6
Vottomatic
All work and no play.....
 
Vottomatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,847
Re: RA Dickey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Footstool View Post
Would the Reds trade Joey Votto and Bronson Arroyo for the likes of Stubbs, Heisey, Paul, and "other junk?"

No.

David Wright is the Mets' Joey Votto. It's wildly unrealistic to propose that they would accept three guys off the Reds' stinkpile for him.
I was joking. Obviously you didn't get that.

Most of the trade proposals you see on Redszone have posters nabbing some superstar and sending our junk in return. Makes me laugh every time.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

"Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread
Vottomatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:57 PM   #7
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,939
Re: RA Dickey

The Reds don't need to invest any more resources into acquiring starting pitching. If they want a Dickey, they have him (his name is Aroldis). And it looks like they're trying to go that route, so no reason to spend any assets to get Dickey.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:58 PM   #8
Kc61
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,847
Re: RA Dickey

The Mets picked up Dickey's option. So he is signed for one year.

He would be a dynamite pickup for one year. He was tremendous this year, he misses bats, he would be a terrific change of pace from the hard throwers.

He would allow the Reds to trade off Leake and keep Chapman at closer.

The obvious problem is that Dickey will want a major extension. The Mets will want a big return. If the Reds only can keep him one season, they will not want to provide that return. So this won't happen.
Kc61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:59 PM   #9
Vottomatic
All work and no play.....
 
Vottomatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,847
Re: RA Dickey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus View Post
The Reds don't need to invest any more resources into acquiring starting pitching. If they want a Dickey, they have him (his name is Aroldis). And it looks like they're trying to go that route, so no reason to spend any assets to get Dickey.
Can you imagine if they had Dickey, though?

Cueto and Dickey have been considered Cy Young candidates. Latos is viewed as a future one. 3 studs in one rotation, and Chapman possibly adding to it. Yikes.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

"Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread
Vottomatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 03:02 PM   #10
Kc61
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,847
Re: RA Dickey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vottomatic View Post
Can you imagine if they had Dickey, though?

Cueto and Dickey have been considered Cy Young candidates. Latos is viewed as a future one. 3 studs in one rotation, and Chapman possibly adding to it. Yikes.
Cueto, Latos, Dickey, Bailey, Arroyo could be the best starting pitching staff in the league.

And then Chapman could close.

This would break some RedsZone hearts, but would create a fabulous staff.

Will not happen because the economics don't make sense. I don't see the Reds trading the farm for a one-year rental.

Some smart GM will acquire Dickey and extend him 2 or 3 years. It's a good gamble. He's a knuckleballer and potentially could be very productive for a few years still.
Kc61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 03:04 PM   #11
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,939
Re: RA Dickey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
Cueto, Latos, Dickey, Bailey, Arroyo could be the best starting pitching staff in the league.

And then Chapman could close.

This would break some RedsZone hearts, but would create a fabulous staff.

Will not happen because the economics don't make sense. I don't see the Reds trading the farm for a one-year rental.

Some smart GM will acquire Dickey and extend him 2 or 3 years. It's a good gamble. He's a knuckleballer and potentially could be very productive for a few years still.
Why trade valuable prospects for a starting pitcher when you have one in-house? They can go out and buy a closer without giving up prospects. Dickey would require giving up assets.

Not a very prudent move IMHO.

If they're going to invest resources like that, it should be acquiring a bat (like David Wright). Otherwise, there is no reason to trade prospects for a position that can be upgraded within their own system.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 03:13 PM   #12
Kc61
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,847
Re: RA Dickey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus View Post
Why trade valuable prospects for a starting pitcher when you have one in-house? They can go out and buy a closer without giving up prospects. Dickey would require giving up assets.

Not a very prudent move IMHO.

If they're going to invest resources like that, it should be acquiring a bat (like David Wright). Otherwise, there is no reason to trade prospects for a position that can be upgraded within their own system.
As I said in my post, the economics of acquiring Dickey don't work IMO. He'd be a rental and I wouldn't give up the farm for a rental.

As for the in-house starter, the Reds don't have one. They have a closer who potentially could be converted to a starter, and could be a very good one, assuming the Reds can otherwise man the bullpen.

The Reds can go various ways on Chapman and the pitching staff, but I don't see Dickey as a fit given his contract status.

Last edited by Kc61; 11-08-2012 at 03:18 PM.
Kc61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 03:31 PM   #13
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: RA Dickey

Dickey for Mesoraco, Leake, and Stubbs. I believe the Mets may consider that. Chapman stays at closer, which means Jocketty doesn't need to buy a closer. (Or much of anything in the pen, for that matter.)

The Reds would still need a CF and a LF, though.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 03:34 PM   #14
REDREAD
Where's my chair?
 
REDREAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,807
Re: RA Dickey

It just seems that most knuckleball pitchers have trouble being dominating year in and year out. Sure, Dickey has a good chance of being good next year, but Cy Young type season again? Probably not. He's more likely to be Joe Neikro.
I would give up what the Mets would realistically want for him.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013!

Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
REDREAD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 03:44 PM   #15
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,432
Re: RA Dickey

Never overpay/buy the highs for a knuckleballer. Pass.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25