RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2012, 01:35 PM   #1
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,528
Shane Shane Shane

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/1...victorino.html

Quote:
Victorino has multiple three-year offers on the table, and even a four-year offer, according to Jon Heyman of CBS Sport.
Quote:
Victorino is believed to be seeking a three-year deal worth about $10MM annually, says Laube.
Quote:
The Indians were one of seven teams said to be interested in Victorino as of last Monday, though their interest wasn't classified as any more serious than the other clubs' at that point. The Rangers, Yankees, Giants, Rays, Red Sox and Reds were the other teams mentioned as potential suitors, with Jon Heyman of CBS Sports noting that multiple clubs were willing to offer three years.
And the Benjamins flowed like wine. I'd pass at those terms.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!!

Last edited by texasdave; 12-03-2012 at 01:38 PM.
texasdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-03-2012, 01:52 PM   #2
webbbj
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 852
Re: Shane Shane Shane

id be willin to give 3 yrs but not at 10m per. Pass. I do worry that overpaying broxton will cost us decent OF upgrade.
webbbj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 02:15 PM   #3
TSJ55
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 374
Re: Shane Shane Shane

Quote:
Originally Posted by webbbj View Post
id be willin to give 3 yrs but not at 10m per. Pass. I do worry that overpaying broxton will cost us decent OF upgrade.
I'm not a Victorino fan to begin with, so 10m/year seems crazy to me. I just don't think he has anything left in the tank. Of course, I reserve the right to be wrong.

As for Broxton, at least we didn't pay him by the pound.
TSJ55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 05:24 PM   #4
HometownHero
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
Re: Shane Shane Shane

These guys are getting paid this year.
HometownHero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 05:51 PM   #5
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,528
Re: Shane Shane Shane

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/1...gel-pagan.html


Angel Pagan stays in the Bay Area by re-upping with the Giants. 4-years, 40 million.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!!
texasdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 06:33 PM   #6
MoneyInTheBank
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 260
Re: Shane Shane Shane

Quote:
Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/1...gel-pagan.html


Angel Pagan stays in the Bay Area by re-upping with the Giants. 4-years, 40 million.
This is not good news for the market as it relates to the Reds. Another CF need is filled but this overpay, combined with the fact that Victorino and Bourn can use Pagan as a comparable player is not good. It would really take the market drying up now to make either of them affordable for the Reds.
MoneyInTheBank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 07:57 PM   #7
JayBruceFan
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kettering
Posts: 693
Re: Shane Shane Shane

With Hamilton being as close to the show as he appears to be, I don't see any big name FA CF signing with us because of the lack of assured playing time past this season.

If we didn't have Hamilton knocking on the door, I think we already have a CF signed and ready to go.
JayBruceFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 08:09 PM   #8
DocRed
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,014
Re: Shane Shane Shane

$10 million for 3 years? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....next
DocRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 09:02 PM   #9
malcontent
malingered here too long
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,972
Re: Shane Shane Shane

Quote:
Originally Posted by webbbj View Post
id be willin to give 3 yrs but not at 10m per. Pass. I do worry that overpaying broxton will cost us decent OF upgrade.
I share that concern. Losing Ludwick and staying on the Stubbs K-Express could mean many fewer games to save in the first place.
malcontent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 09:24 PM   #10
dMaus14
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 305
Re: Shane Shane Shane

I think with the Nationals trading for Span, BUpton going to the Braves for a ridiculous amount of money, and Pagan re-signing with the Giants is good for the Redlegs. The Phillies are the only team really needing a CF and they will over pay for one either in trade terms with Fowler or in $$ with Bourn / Victorino. Personally, I think this is a good thing.
dMaus14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 09:33 PM   #11
MoneyInTheBank
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 260
Re: Shane Shane Shane

Quote:
Originally Posted by dMaus14 View Post
I think with the Nationals trading for Span, BUpton going to the Braves for a ridiculous amount of money, and Pagan re-signing with the Giants is good for the Redlegs. The Phillies are the only team really needing a CF and they will over pay for one either in trade terms with Fowler or in $$ with Bourn / Victorino. Personally, I think this is a good thing.
Are you thinking that because of the ridiculous deals for Upton and Pagan that Victorino and Bourn will be asking for too much and eventually settle for 1 year deals to try again next season?
MoneyInTheBank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 09:44 PM   #12
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,528
Re: Shane Shane Shane

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank View Post
Are you thinking that because of the ridiculous deals for Upton and Pagan that Victorino and Bourn will be asking for too much and eventually settle for 1 year deals to try again next season?
I think the TV money is causing salaries to go up and these may not be ridiculous deals when we look back on things. You would have to think that if the Reds could shell out around 300 million last winter that the other teams have money to spend as well.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!!
texasdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 09:58 PM   #13
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,528
Re: Shane Shane Shane

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank View Post
Are you thinking that because of the ridiculous deals for Upton and Pagan that Victorino and Bourn will be asking for too much and eventually settle for 1 year deals to try again next season?
If the rumors are true there are a lot of teams interested in Victorino. MLBtraderumors has it that the Red Sox are comfortable with a three-year deal for Victorino. With all that interest he will likely get nearly what he wants. If I were in Victorino's shoes I wouldn't roll the dice on a one-year pact. Not at his age.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!!
texasdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 10:46 PM   #14
dMaus14
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 305
Re: Shane Shane Shane

He has 3 and 4 year deal offers but it obviously isn't they money he wants. My guess is he has offers in 3/$25M range.
dMaus14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 11:51 PM   #15
Larkin88
Member
 
Larkin88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 494
Re: Shane Shane Shane

Victorino is, to me, easily the least attractive "upgrade" option for CF/LF and leadoff. Which would be all good and fine if he'd come with a deal proportionate to the player I personally view him as.

But 3/$30? You gotta be kitten me.

Last edited by Larkin88; 12-03-2012 at 11:54 PM.
Larkin88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25