![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,430
|
Bruce or Choo in CF?
Who will end up playing there? Initial reports said it would be Choo. Walt says it will be worked out in ST. Olney says everyone else thinks it will be Bruce. Your thoughts?
My guess is Bruce. But that worries me a bit -- not b/c I think he can't do it, but b/c I worry about an injury. I remember him playing CF in ST one of those first years, and he had hamstring trouble from all the running.
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,858
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
I would go with Choo. Unless he is a complete disaster he should be the one.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,430
|
From what I've read, lots of people think he will be a complete disaster.
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,660
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
All things considered, I think Choo should get the best shot at it because Hamilton "could" be ready to help out and Choo could be moved around the OF to find PT. Meanwhile, keeping Bruce where he is seems sensible. He's a bigger part of the team and I don't want him getting injured. Anyway, the answer to this won't be evident until mid-May after the chosen alignment has had some practice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,073
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
Quote:
Choo is a one-year rental. Bruce is a cornerstone of the franchise. If someone is going to be forced to play out of position, it should be the guy who is only here one year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,545
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
I think it will be Choo's to lose.
I will miss watching Stubbs chase balls down in the gaps with ease.
__________________
"Strickland Propane... Taste the meat, not the heat." - Hank Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
Bruce. At the end of the day, I go with the alignment that I think will be most effective. If and when there seem to be negative consequences from having Bruce in CF, we can adjust, but like the with the "Chapman as starter" discussion, I don't want to avoid trying to be the best we can be simply because it might not work. There's a way to do that prudently, starting with a thorough vetting in ST, but I think Bruce is likely the better option.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. Last edited by RedsManRick; 12-13-2012 at 12:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,073
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
Quote:
It sounds like a bunch of hand-wringing for the sake of hand-wringing. Bruce and Choo are almost exactly the same player defensively. They are both guys who started out as CF in the minors but were moved to RF upon arriving in the majors based upon the belief that they were middling defenders in CF but could be outstanding defenders in RF. Both of them panned out as above-average RF with howitzer arms, but didn't quite live up to the 'potential gold glove' hype. Both of them can play CF in a pinch but you probably don't want them there long-term. I see no reason to believe that Bruce will be any better than Choo manning CF. Assuming that is the case, why mess with one of the cornerstones of the franchise? Make the new guy who is only here for a year make the switch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,430
|
I thought Bruce was a borderline GG caliber RF. At the very least he gets good reads and runs hood routes. Choo, apparently, has a good arm but not much else going for him out there.
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 921
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
I'd prefer Bruce in a one-season vacuum, but based on the circumstances, I'll say Choo. He's not going to be around after this year, and I'm OK with him struggling a little if need be.
__________________
"I never argue with people who say baseball is boring, because baseball is boring. And then, suddenly, it isn't. And that's what makes it great." - Joe Posnanski 2013 Attendance Record 1-0 (4/3 Angels 5-4) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 521
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
My problem is uprooting Jay Bruce from the position that he'll likely play for the next half decade for one season of Choo. I agree Choo would have to be a disaster to move Bruce over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
First Time Caller
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,228
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
Unless Choo can stand on the warning track in right field and throw a one hop seed to third base, I say leave Bruce where he is.
__________________
Dusty Baker, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,381
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 377
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Bruce or Choo in CF?
Quote:
Both Bruce and Choo are better from an arm perspective than a range one. But for Choo, the range is actually a problem and likely something that would be exacerbated in CF. Code:
PLAYER G Votes React Accel Velo Hands Ftwork ThrStr ThrAcc AvgRng AvgArm TotAVg RngRank ArmRnk Overall Heyward, Jason 151 33 75 75 77 74 75 84 73 75 77 77 3 5 1 Suzuki, Ichiro (SEA) 93 68 74 78 73 74 79 77 79 75 78 76 4 3 2 Hunter, Torii 124 19 75 70 61 75 77 70 77 70 75 71 5 10 3 Reddick, Josh 142 21 70 64 59 63 80 87 88 64 85 70 6 1 4 Blanco, Gregor 98 30 80 82 83 76 58 38 49 80 48 70 1 23 4 Bogusevic, Brian 90 12 62 59 64 62 68 81 76 62 75 66 8 9 6 Bruce, Jay 149 35 57 59 58 51 73 87 81 56 80 64 15 2 7 Stanton, Giancarlo 115 12 52 60 69 48 63 83 71 57 72 64 11 11 7 Markakis, Nick 103 34 58 55 54 71 70 71 73 60 71 62 10 12 9 Venable, Will 104 10 58 68 69 51 62 53 59 62 58 61 9 14 10 Revere, Ben 118 32 71 89 89 69 40 0 28 80 23 61 2 31 10 Choo, Shin-Soo 148 31 44 48 58 48 67 87 75 50 76 59 21 7 12 Beltran, Carlos 130 26 68 50 50 61 64 66 72 57 67 59 11 13 12 Upton, Justin 142 16 52 65 74 34 43 77 49 56 56 59 15 17 12 Aoki, Norichika 121 28 63 61 63 63 61 30 57 63 49 58 7 22 15 Rios, Alex 152 17 52 63 70 44 53 51 57 57 54 57 11 19 16 Bautista, Jose 87 53 46 43 44 53 67 88 76 47 77 56 22 6 17 Joyce, Matt 106 14 58 54 52 58 55 60 57 56 57 56 17 16 17 Ethier, Andre 141 11 56 50 48 67 62 53 59 55 58 55 18 14 19 DeJesus, David 125 24 61 55 52 61 56 48 55 57 53 55 11 20 19 Cruz, Nelson 145 32 29 40 54 35 61 89 78 40 76 53 25 8 21 Denorfia, Chris 82 10 52 48 57 51 55 51 59 52 55 53 20 18 21 Colvin, Tyler 99 10 49 58 55 48 48 46 47 53 47 51 19 25 23 Francoeur, Jeff 144 33 32 28 35 48 67 87 81 36 78 49 27 3 24 Tabata, Jose 82 12 25 50 53 44 41 55 49 43 48 46 23 23 25 Swisher, Nick 130 28 44 35 41 43 53 45 55 41 51 44 24 21 26 Ross, Cody 108 23 42 37 41 33 43 45 49 38 46 41 26 28 27 Pence, Hunter 100 22 21 29 57 23 24 70 46 33 47 40 29 26 28 Cuddyer, Michael 89 13 42 32 41 27 36 53 49 36 46 40 28 27 28 Boesch, Brennan 101 52 10 23 38 11 22 45 35 21 34 27 30 29 30 Duda, Lucas 98 24 4 10 22 23 15 41 35 15 30 21 31 30 31
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |