texasdave
08-01-2009, 01:31 PM
David Ortiz was "blindsided" by this revelation? Is he serious? First, he knows his name is on that list. Second, he knows big names off that list are being leaked. Third, he knows he is a big name. Connect those dots, Big Papi. Are you telling me that he didn't put 1+1+1 together and come up with 'Big Papi is busted'? Tutor, please. Bronson Arroyo figured it out. Whether this is right or wrong, fair or unfair, Ortiz had to have an inkling. Epiphanies can be rough.
From CNNSI:
David Ortiz said he was "blindsided" by the disclosure, but acknowledged the players' union confirmed he tested positive.
AP
BALTIMORE (AP) -- Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz fended off further questions Friday about his 2003 drug test, saying he needed more time to gather information.
"I am trying to find out what's going on. When I get my stuff together, I'll let you guys know," Ortiz said before the Red Sox faced the Baltimore Orioles.
The New York Times, citing unidentified lawyers with knowledge of the results, reported Thursday that Ortiz and former teammate Manny Ramirez were among the 104 players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs six years ago. The list was supposed to be confidential.
Ortiz said Thursday he was "blindsided" by the disclosure, but acknowledged the players' union confirmed he tested positive.
"The process needs to play out," Red Sox manager Terry Francona said. "And that's hard, because there are probably going to be a lot of opinions the next few days about David's situation without the information that is needed."
"We need to get to the bottom of this. There does need to be answers, I agree, but they're not there yet, so we have to be patient."
Rob Manfred, Major League Baseball's executive vice president of labor relations, said all players take at least two drug tests a year.
"It should be noted that the recent revelations about positive results during survey testing are six years old," he said.
Los Angeles Dodgers manager Joe Torre, in Atlanta for his team's game against the Braves, criticized the timing and the fashion in which names from that 2003 test have been leaked.
"All this stuff is ancient history. They're talking about six years ago," Torre said. "It's something that obviously certain people have access to and they're choosing to systematically have fun with it."
Torre did, however, understand why the stories keep making news.
"You can't ignore this," he said.
From CNNSI:
David Ortiz said he was "blindsided" by the disclosure, but acknowledged the players' union confirmed he tested positive.
AP
BALTIMORE (AP) -- Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz fended off further questions Friday about his 2003 drug test, saying he needed more time to gather information.
"I am trying to find out what's going on. When I get my stuff together, I'll let you guys know," Ortiz said before the Red Sox faced the Baltimore Orioles.
The New York Times, citing unidentified lawyers with knowledge of the results, reported Thursday that Ortiz and former teammate Manny Ramirez were among the 104 players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs six years ago. The list was supposed to be confidential.
Ortiz said Thursday he was "blindsided" by the disclosure, but acknowledged the players' union confirmed he tested positive.
"The process needs to play out," Red Sox manager Terry Francona said. "And that's hard, because there are probably going to be a lot of opinions the next few days about David's situation without the information that is needed."
"We need to get to the bottom of this. There does need to be answers, I agree, but they're not there yet, so we have to be patient."
Rob Manfred, Major League Baseball's executive vice president of labor relations, said all players take at least two drug tests a year.
"It should be noted that the recent revelations about positive results during survey testing are six years old," he said.
Los Angeles Dodgers manager Joe Torre, in Atlanta for his team's game against the Braves, criticized the timing and the fashion in which names from that 2003 test have been leaked.
"All this stuff is ancient history. They're talking about six years ago," Torre said. "It's something that obviously certain people have access to and they're choosing to systematically have fun with it."
Torre did, however, understand why the stories keep making news.
"You can't ignore this," he said.