View Full Version : Fun and Interesting NFL Stat
texasdave
01-05-2010, 01:35 PM
Listening to Houston sportstalk yesterday and the host noted that for the
14th consecutive season a team that had lost at least 10 games the previous season won at least 10 games. Pretty remarkable. With that in mind look at the teams that lost double-digit games in 2009 and pick one that will reach double-digit wins in 2010.
St. Louis Rams 1-15
Detroit Lions 2-14
Tampa Bay Bucs 3-13
Washington Redskins 4-12
Kansas City Chiefs 4-12
Cleveland Browns 5-11
Oakland Raiders 5-11
Seattle Seahawks 5-11
Buffalo Bills 6-10
Simply because of the division they play in I will go with Seattle. Good luck picking the winner from that pile of flotsam and jetsam.
bucksfan2
01-05-2010, 01:43 PM
Washington - They will spend some serious money.
Oakland - Dysfunctional but have serious talent. If they find a QB look out.
Eric_the_Red
01-05-2010, 01:48 PM
If they keep Russell benched and Al Davis away from the draft, the Raiders.
Redsfan320
01-05-2010, 02:01 PM
I'll go with Detroit or Buffalo if I have to pick. Just have a feeling that they'll do better next year.
320
macro
01-05-2010, 05:53 PM
Oakland
RichRed
01-05-2010, 06:32 PM
Washington - They will spend some serious money.
They've always spent serious money but I agree - or at least hope - that you're right. But the reason I think it's possible is because they have a real GM (Bruce Allen) for the first time in eons and are supposedly close to hiring a real coach (Shanahan).
BearcatShane
01-05-2010, 06:42 PM
Kansas City. Charles is a really good back and I tjink Cassel is decent. Bowe is a solid reciever as well. They do need som defensive help.
Joseph
01-05-2010, 06:46 PM
Seattle. Weak division. Good QB usually. Need a big back in the draft, then who knows.
dougdirt
01-05-2010, 07:32 PM
Oakland - Dysfunctional but have serious talent. If they find a QB look out.
What he said.
Redsfan320
01-05-2010, 08:37 PM
Also, if one of these teams can get their hands on Ndamukong Suh, they get a big edge on D.
320
paintmered
01-05-2010, 11:18 PM
Also, if one of these teams can get their hands on Ndamukong Suh, they get a big edge on D.
320
I think it's safe to assume that Suh will be a Ram next year.
Caveat Emperor
01-05-2010, 11:25 PM
I think it's safe to assume that Suh will be a Ram next year.
I wouldn't be shocked if the Rams tried to get out of the pick and land somewhere to take a QB. They could, theoretically, swap down 2 spots with Tampa Bay and still land their choice of Bradford / McCoy or Claussen (since Detroit, at #2, isn't taking a QB) without having to give up the cheddar for a #1 overall pick.
That's assuming they grade out 1 of those 3 as a franchise QB.
Handofdeath
01-06-2010, 02:09 PM
I wouldn't be shocked if the Rams tried to get out of the pick and land somewhere to take a QB. They could, theoretically, swap down 2 spots with Tampa Bay and still land their choice of Bradford / McCoy or Claussen (since Detroit, at #2, isn't taking a QB) without having to give up the cheddar for a #1 overall pick.
That's assuming they grade out 1 of those 3 as a franchise QB.
They drafted Keith Null in the 6th round last year so he's going to get his chance. You have to cut him some slack, last season he was playing Division II college football at West Texas A&M.
Caveat Emperor
01-06-2010, 02:31 PM
They drafted Keith Null in the 6th round last year so he's going to get his chance. You have to cut him some slack, last season he was playing Division II college football at West Texas A&M.
If the Rams pass up an opportunity to add picks AND draft a franchise quarterback because they think Suh is just too special to pass up, that's logic I can understand.
If the Rams pass up an opportunity to add picks AND draft a franchise quarterback because they think some kid who couldn't crack a D1 roster is their quarterback of the future, then they just plain deserve to continue losing.
traderumor
01-06-2010, 03:57 PM
Cleveland
reds1869
01-07-2010, 12:08 AM
Cleveland
I was thinking the same thing; glad you said it first. :)
traderumor
01-07-2010, 03:44 PM
I was thinking the same thing; glad you said it first. :)I'll elaborate. Pure hunch, but their season mirrored the Bengals last season--horrible start, looked like they weren't going to win a game, found a HB and started kicking butt with a running game and D in the last quarter of the season.
However, they do not get a Carson Palmer back as part of the following season, but they will get advantageous scheduling due to the last place finish in the division. I look for them to be vying for a playoff bid next year while the Steelers and Ravens slip to below .500, as things look going into the offseason.
BearcatShane
01-08-2010, 03:56 AM
Hopefully Josh Cribbs leaves the Browns.
thatcoolguy_22
01-08-2010, 06:48 AM
Hopefully Josh Cribbs leaves the Browns.
Josh Cribbs is that 1 play on Madden that always seems to work. They will grow as a team when he is gone...lol
My vote is Cleveland.
Eric_the_Red
01-08-2010, 10:12 AM
Wonder if the Bengals could lure Cribbs to play for them?
camisadelgolf
01-08-2010, 02:03 PM
Based on my experience of watching Mike Brown as a GM, and after the money they dumped into Vern Coles, I really doubt it, EtR.
macro
01-08-2010, 04:25 PM
Wonder if the Bengals could lure Cribbs to play for them?
Right now the only way he can leave the Browns is through a trade, and I can't believe they'd trade him to a division rival. Would love to see him in stripes, though.
Kingspoint
01-09-2010, 04:45 AM
Washington. They have a great Defense already, and are bringing in the best zone-blocking Coach in the Universe; zone-blocking being the easiest system to learn if you have new personnel, which they need on their entire Offensive Line.
Kingspoint
01-09-2010, 04:47 AM
I'll go with Detroit or Buffalo if I have to pick. Just have a feeling that they'll do better next year.
320
Buffalo would be my second pick as they had an outstanding draft last season and should get another impact player or two in this next draft.
Kingspoint
01-09-2010, 04:50 AM
Kansas City. Charles is a really good back and I tjink Cassel is decent. Bowe is a solid reciever as well. They do need som defensive help.
Kansas City is my 3rd choice. Their Defense is actually better than their Offense right now. They have no Center, whatsoever, and will have to either take the best Center in the draft or sign a really good one in Free Agency. If they don't do that, they'll be in the lottery again. If they do, they could win those 10 games. It's that important of a decision.
Kingspoint
01-09-2010, 04:52 AM
I wouldn't be shocked if the Rams tried to get out of the pick and land somewhere to take a QB. They could, theoretically, swap down 2 spots with Tampa Bay and still land their choice of Bradford / McCoy or Claussen (since Detroit, at #2, isn't taking a QB) without having to give up the cheddar for a #1 overall pick.
That's assuming they grade out 1 of those 3 as a franchise QB.They'll take Suh. He's not only the most physically gifted player in the draft, but he's an outstanding human being. I've known him since he was in grade school. He comes from a great family.
Kingspoint
01-09-2010, 04:56 AM
Seattle. Weak division. Good QB usually. Need a big back in the draft, then who knows.
Unfortunately, for Seattle, they failed to address the Left Tackle position last year and instead took Aaron Curry. Worst decision in last year's draft and the reason why the G.M. was fired. Now the team is two years behind because they also need a new Quarterback. Max Unger was a great pick, but he can't play every line position like he did at Oregon. He did play both LG and C for Seattle this year. There are too, too many holes at Seattle. They need two Wide Receivers, Safeties, Cornerback, Quarterback, Left Tackle, Right Tackle, and another Center/Guard. They're looking at another lottery season next year. They're completely rebuilding.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.