LeDoux
05-25-2010, 04:36 PM
Perhaps some of you are familiar with the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator (MBTI). For those who are not, it is a "survey" primary used by organizations to show the variety of ways individuals perceive the world. It is not a clinical instrument, like the MMPI-II, it is more of an organizational tool. Here is a link to another survey based on the same Jungian methodology:
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes1.htm
I had a few spare minutes and filled out the survey based upon what I thought Dusty Baker would answer. The results are: Extraverted (100%) Sensing (25%) Feeling (88%) Judging (1%). This would be consistent with a manager who would care about his players as people, not just production units. However, this may also be consistent with a weakness in conceptualizing abstract theory and task-focused procedures. In short, I thought it was a good tool to explain why Dusty is respected as a leader in the clubhouse, while still making mystifying in-game decisions. Everyone can decide for themselves what value to place on each of these qualities, but I don’t see why Dusty’s weakness couldn’t be covered by having a sidekick in the dugout whispering reminders about “the numbers” in matchups and substitutions. I think this would be a powerful leadership combination- a player’s coach with strategic counsel.
If you have the time, take the survey yourself. Most people find the results at least somewhat interesting. If you come out strong INTJ, you probably are wondering why Dusty wasn’t fired already. As an ESFP, you may think he’s the coach of the decade.
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes1.htm
I had a few spare minutes and filled out the survey based upon what I thought Dusty Baker would answer. The results are: Extraverted (100%) Sensing (25%) Feeling (88%) Judging (1%). This would be consistent with a manager who would care about his players as people, not just production units. However, this may also be consistent with a weakness in conceptualizing abstract theory and task-focused procedures. In short, I thought it was a good tool to explain why Dusty is respected as a leader in the clubhouse, while still making mystifying in-game decisions. Everyone can decide for themselves what value to place on each of these qualities, but I don’t see why Dusty’s weakness couldn’t be covered by having a sidekick in the dugout whispering reminders about “the numbers” in matchups and substitutions. I think this would be a powerful leadership combination- a player’s coach with strategic counsel.
If you have the time, take the survey yourself. Most people find the results at least somewhat interesting. If you come out strong INTJ, you probably are wondering why Dusty wasn’t fired already. As an ESFP, you may think he’s the coach of the decade.