texasdave
06-22-2012, 09:53 AM
I don't really pretend to know all the ins and outs of xFIP, but I thought it was premised upon things that pitchers (supposedly) control. Like strikeouts and walks and home runs. Now maybe the accuracy of xFIP does not kick in until a certain level of innings pitched has been reached. I don't know. But here are the current xFIP numbers of the Reds' five starters. Do they look like they match up with the performances we have seen on the field so far this year?
Name xFIP
Leake 3.66
Cueto 3.78
Arroyo 4.08
Latos 4.12
Bailey 4.38
Has Mike Leake really been the Reds' best starting pitcher? Is Johnny Cueto an average pitcher and not an ace? Have Latos and Arroyo honestly pitched better than Bailey? Is Homer our worst starter?
Maybe someone can explain or put these numbers into their proper context. Looking at this I simply have no use for xFIP because it certainly doesn't match up with reality as I see it. Not even close.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2012&month=0&season1=2012&ind=0&team=18&rost=0&age=0&players=0&sort=16,d
Name xFIP
Leake 3.66
Cueto 3.78
Arroyo 4.08
Latos 4.12
Bailey 4.38
Has Mike Leake really been the Reds' best starting pitcher? Is Johnny Cueto an average pitcher and not an ace? Have Latos and Arroyo honestly pitched better than Bailey? Is Homer our worst starter?
Maybe someone can explain or put these numbers into their proper context. Looking at this I simply have no use for xFIP because it certainly doesn't match up with reality as I see it. Not even close.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2012&month=0&season1=2012&ind=0&team=18&rost=0&age=0&players=0&sort=16,d