Turn Off Ads?
Page 5 of 41 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 604

Thread: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

  1. #61
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Dayton Ohio
    Posts
    85

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Its 3-2 dodgers


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #62
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunner44 View Post
    So no argument from dusty? And people wonder why some of us despise him
    What's the point? Other than getting the crowd riled up, seriously what's the point? Have any of you EVER seen an ump change the ruling on the field because a manager argued? Considering Dusty's recent health status...not getting riled up for no point is probably a good idea.

  4. #63
    Member VR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    9,850

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    I'm so glad Fox is showing me the White Sox game instead of Reds-Dodgers. I mean, here in Chicago it's darn near impossible to get those games otherwise. At least I can watch the Reds on mlb.tv. Oh wait... nm. Is there any reason to not hate Fox?
    I'm in SF today, and didn't even think to see if the Reds were on......guess what? They are!

    thanks for the discussion boys, I would have never checked
    Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand

  5. #64
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Dayton Ohio
    Posts
    85

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    Baker did come out to argue, for the record.
    I must have missed it. Thanks 757690

  6. #65
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Saint Joseph, Mo
    Posts
    9,731

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    What's the point? Other than getting the crowd riled up, seriously what's the point? Have any of you EVER seen an ump change the ruling on the field because a manager argued?
    No - but ya gotta admit it would be fun to see Dusty get excited once in a while. Might not signify a thing but it would fun to see him go all Earl Weaver. No other reason really. I just like the fireworks.

  7. #66
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by 1940757690 View Post
    You watching or listening? I ask since your sig here says Houston. They do keep saying tied at 2; just said it again before breaking for a commercial. Odd.
    Listening. MLB.tv is blacked out. Fox is showing the Yankees here in Houston.

  8. #67
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Saint Joseph, Mo
    Posts
    9,731

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    Listening. MLB.tv is blacked out. Fox is showing the Yankees here in Houston.
    That makes as much sense as the Yankees here in KC.

  9. #68
    Member VR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    9,850

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    Baker did come out to argue, for the record.
    Yes, but he should have looked really, really mad.....especially when the cameras were on him. He's obviously a lousy manager.
    Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand

  10. Likes:

    _Sir_Charles_ (09-07-2013)

  11. #69
    Member 1940757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    500

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by VR View Post
    I'm in SF today, and didn't even think to see if the Reds were on......guess what? They are!

    thanks for the discussion boys, I would have never checked
    Happy for you...really. But big grumble. I'm in DC. You're in SFO. You get this game on regional broadcast and I don't? Man I'd love to see someone take a metaphorical bazooka to the broadcast/cable television industry.
    Reds & Nats, 2013 LCS. Take2 (9/13) Reds but no Nats

  12. #70
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,270

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by VR View Post
    Yes, but he should have looked really, really mad.....especially when the cameras were on him. He's obviously a lousy manager.
    I honestly think Baker goes out not to argue, but ask how are the wife and kids. He the anti Earl Weaver.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769023

  13. #71
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Saint Joseph, Mo
    Posts
    9,731

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by 1940757690 View Post
    Happy for you...really. But big grumble. I'm in DC. You're in SFO. You get this game on regional broadcast and I don't? Man I'd love to see someone take a metaphorical bazooka to the broadcast/cable television industry.
    As advanced as satellite/cable is you'd think between three games you could select the game you want with on demand. Shouldn't be that hard to do technologically. And it defaults to a regional game.

  14. #72
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,017

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    bottom of the Reds order out in order
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  15. #73
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Saint Joseph, Mo
    Posts
    9,731

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    2 innings 5 combined runs. I'm kind of surprised.

  16. #74
    Member VR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    9,850

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by 1940757690 View Post
    Happy for you...really. But big grumble. I'm in DC. You're in SFO. You get this game on regional broadcast and I don't? Man I'd love to see someone take a metaphorical bazooka to the broadcast/cable television industry.
    Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand

  17. Likes:

    757690 (09-07-2013),KittyDuran (09-07-2013)

  18. #75
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Dodgers vs Reds 9/7/2013

    Quote Originally Posted by RedlegJake View Post
    That makes as much sense as the Yankees here in KC.
    I guess they could argue that it's an AL game and Houston is now an AL town. I loathe the NY/BOS lovefest nationwide with the media.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator