Scratching my head trying to figure the Colts logic in selecting another W.R. in Phillip Dorsett they need O.l. help or perhaps another R.B. as a change of pace for gore .Seems another W.R. is an unneeded luxury.
Scratching my head trying to figure the Colts logic in selecting another W.R. in Phillip Dorsett they need O.l. help or perhaps another R.B. as a change of pace for gore .Seems another W.R. is an unneeded luxury.
Last edited by cinredsfan2000; 05-01-2015 at 07:46 AM.
I guess I'm to the point now where I trust Marvin Lewis' ability to draft players. We're not immune to terrible picks by any means, but he hasn't missed often. When they say this is the guy they wanted all along, I'm happy we were able to get him. Grading the pick one way or the other seems silly until at least a couple of years have passed and we see what we have in him. The Bengals were absolutely gushing about the guy. We don't need an OT right away, but we all know that we are going to need an OT in the near future.
And ML has shown the ability to consistently get impact players after the first round. With as much talent that's left, and all of the picks we have left, I think we're in a great spot.
HeatherC1212 (05-01-2015)
Playing for UK is a bonus, but I'd feel the same way if he played for Ohio State.
He's a physical freak who plays at a position the Bengals needed help at just as much.
I agree with Dom. The Bengals aren't in a luxury where they can do a draft and stash. They need someone who can come in and make an impact THIS year and they failed.
Revering4Blue (05-01-2015)
I would have liked the Wide Out at this pick. I hate the idea of a stash pick but with our injury history this kid may play. Not really concerned about the back, the only site I saw any concerns about the back were on Rotoworld. Plus he did pass his draft physical which is pretty intense. Personally I would have taken Green Beckham or the kid from ASU Strong however Bengals could get these guys in round 2. I will see how things play out tonight.
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
It amuses me that so many people predicted that Shane Ray's marijuana citation would drop him to the third or fourth round, yet he still goes comfortably in the first round. If he was caught with meth I could understand, but pot? Drug moralizers are out of touch with reality.
westofyou (05-01-2015)
What position does Dupree play that he's an immediate impact player for the Bengals?
DE and he's behind Dunlap and Johnson. Also pretty small to play DE in the AFCN
OLB? Not great in coverage.
He can make an immediate impact as a pass rushing OLB for the Steelers because of their defense. He'd have been out of place on the Bengals.
Wonder if the Eagles are going to try and grab Hundley today.
“I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”
Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. -- Carl Sagan (Pale Blue Dot)
I didn't love the pick last night, but I don't think it was a bad one. I think he'll probably be a very good player. However, if I was the Bengals, I would have approached this draft with a much higher risk tolerance instead of taking a reasoned, long term approach, even though that has a much higher chance of being successful.
The Bengals seem to be stuck in a place where they're pretty good, but Dalton surrounded by a really good cast isn't enough to get it done. And they don't really have any glaring holes. There are no positions on the roster that absolutely must be upgraded. They need to catch lightning in a bottle, and get some dynamic playmakers. But based on where they draft, they need to take risks. I would have liked to see them take Shane Ray, and I hope they're at least looking at DGB if he's there in round 2 (I'm a little more hesitant about DGB based on the DV accusation, but I haven't followed it too closely). I think they need to be willing to completely strike out in the hopes of getting a potential star, especially because the guy they ended up getting was more a luxury than a specific need. If he ends up being a whiff, there are already 2 solid guys ahead of him.
Benihana (05-01-2015)
I would argue LB is a glaring hole but I get that there wasn't anyone at #21 worth taking. The entire defense ranked #23rd and had 20 total sacks, so I would say pass rusher is a glaring hole. Johnson back should help, but he's still only had one double-digit sack season so I don't think he alone is anywhere near a solution.
The addition of Jeremy Hill last year was huge, but unfortunately half the team was hurt by the end of the year.
Without Jones and Eifert for the entire year, Green for some of it, Gresham by the end of it and then missing all we were on defense, we were a gutted team last year. That we even made the playoffs says a lot about Marvin's ability to coach and build depth in the organization.
I agree we don't have any glaring holes that need to be filled. The one way to make this team a lot better is to find an elite QB somewhere, but that isn't gonna happen. I'm just hoping that we can make it through this upcoming season relatively healthy so we have a better chance to beat good teams when it matters.
Jeremy Hill made us a lot better. I want to see how good we are with him and a healthy receiving group. Especially Eifert and Jones.
HeatherC1212 (05-03-2015)
Pass rusher is a hole, but Michael Johnson is almost certain to start over anybody that would get drafted at #21. It will be interesting to see what Margus Hunt can do this year as well, but he shouldn't keep the Bengals from drafting anybody. It should be interesting to see who they go after today
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |