That’s a little skewed/misleading because Meadows and Glasnow no longer qualify as prospects.Originally Posted by PuffyPig
That said, it makes me wonder what kind of big league asset the Reds could’ve gotten had they been willing to part with Shed Long.
Go BLUE!!!
BA has updated their top 100. 4 Senzel, 21 Trammell, 31 Greene, 45 India. No other Reds
Four in the top 50 is nice to see.
Still believe the talking heads are sleeping on Santillan.
J J Cooper article on prospects traded at the deadline. Notes that the price for improving a contender keeps going down given the low number of top 100 prospects traded.
https://www.baseballamerica.com/stor...m_medium=email
It seems to me that there is a strong trend to get younger and to refuse to depart with top prospects. It probably accounts for why the Reds did not move Harvey. Perhaps offers were little more than minor league filler. This youth trend suggests that veteran FA players may again find it hard to get long term deals this off season.
Edd Roush (08-03-2018),RiverRat13 (08-03-2018)
The Reds would do well to take advantage of this trend.
Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. -- Carl Sagan (Pale Blue Dot)
Kingspoint (08-03-2018),Kinsm (08-03-2018)
Where would Sims slot in on the Reds prospect list?
Ineligible I believe, but if he were eligible probably behind Santillan and on par with Gutierrez. Think of him as another Robert Stephenson.
Go BLUE!!!
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote