I really don't think you pay any attention to half the stuff you type.
Let's backtrack briefly.
1) it's been thoroughly proven that Tucker is offensively abysmal
2) You pivot your argument to claim that as bad as he is on offense, he's still at 0 WAR, so he must be super awesome on defense and still valuable.
3) myself and others dispute that notion and say he's an average-ish defender at best and that no amount of great defense at 0 WAR overall is a good fit in this offensively challenged lineup.
4) you claim to have a thread full of facts that everyone is ignoring.
5) you call everyone Thom. This is in addition to you accusing me of calling you a con man and a liar.
6) I correctly point out that the only "evidence" in this entire thread you've provided to prove TB is good defensively is one pitch framing stat.
7. I point out his below average -1 DRS and his pitiful 22% CS rate.
Let's not forget this is in the same thread where you spent 3 posts arguing with me about an entirely different point than what I was trying to make, while condescending to me about "talking more slowly so I can understand" only to admit this
Are there any points above that youre willing to dispute?