Turn Off Ads?
Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 215

Thread: Offseason Trade Targets

  1. #121
    Member marcshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Zeta Reticuli
    Posts
    10,042

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by harmony View Post
    For what it's worth, Baseball Trade Values assigned Omar Narvaez a surplus value of $11.9 million as recently as October 31 but has since downgraded the Seattle catcher to a surplus value of $5.1 million.

    The Seattle front office may be holding out for the earlier figure.
    He had a bad November. I think it was because nobody would pitch to him.
    It is on the whole probable that we continually dream, but that consciousness makes such a noise that we do not hear it. Carl Jung.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #122
    Backup First Baseman OGB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,467

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
    No.
    I can't understand people's interest in adding a scumbag to the team. If he was on the team, I'd be rooting for the Reds to get rid of him.
    (Referring to Jack Hannahan signing with a Korean team)
    Since there are no teams on the moon, I guess South Korea's far enough from Cincinnati to satisfy me.
    -RichRed

  4. Likes:

    757690 (12-05-2019),Wonderful Monds (12-02-2019)

  5. #123
    Backup First Baseman OGB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,467

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Anybody else on board to package Aquino, India and others and try to pry some mixture of Perez/Merrifield/Tim Hill/Ian Kennedy from KC?
    Obviously not all of them, but I'd love a deal centered around Whit or Salvador, provided he's ready to play.
    (Referring to Jack Hannahan signing with a Korean team)
    Since there are no teams on the moon, I guess South Korea's far enough from Cincinnati to satisfy me.
    -RichRed

  6. #124
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,128

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by OGB View Post
    Anybody else on board to package Aquino, India and others and try to pry some mixture of Perez/Merrifield/Tim Hill/Ian Kennedy from KC?
    Obviously not all of them, but I'd love a deal centered around Whit or Salvador, provided he's ready to play.
    I like Whit, the other ones don't do too much for me.

    A few interesting trade targets available for a CF-RF spot. Merrifield, Haniger, Marte, maybe AJ Pollock.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  7. #125
    Member Mitri's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    5,155

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by OGB View Post
    Anybody else on board to package Aquino, India and others and try to pry some mixture of Perez/Merrifield/Tim Hill/Ian Kennedy from KC?
    Obviously not all of them, but I'd love a deal centered around Whit or Salvador, provided he's ready to play.
    I think the Whit Merrifield dream is over. Sorry Whit fan-clubbers/half of RZ.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    I like Whit, the other ones don't do too much for me.

    A few interesting trade targets available for a CF-RF spot. Merrifield, Haniger, Marte, maybe AJ Pollock.
    I still like Marte for Winker/India - ish and move Senzel to LF.

  8. #126
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    314

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    I think I'd be calling the M's to work out a Narvaez deal. I'd love to get Haniger with him but I'd move quickly before Dipoto gives him away.

  9. #127
    Backup First Baseman OGB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,467

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Mitri View Post
    I think the Whit Merrifield dream is over. Sorry Whit fan-clubbers/half of RZ.

    - - - Updated - - -



    I still like Marte for Winker/India - ish and move Senzel to LF.
    Just curious, do you think it's over because KC is no longer looking to trade him, because the Reds don't want/need him, or other/a combination of factors?
    (Referring to Jack Hannahan signing with a Korean team)
    Since there are no teams on the moon, I guess South Korea's far enough from Cincinnati to satisfy me.
    -RichRed

  10. #128
    Member Mitri's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    5,155

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by OGB View Post
    Just curious, do you think it's over because KC is no longer looking to trade him, because the Reds don't want/need him, or other/a combination of factors?
    Reds don’t have a place to play him

  11. #129
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    18,150

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    I like Whit, the other ones don't do too much for me.

    A few interesting trade targets available for a CF-RF spot. Merrifield, Haniger, Marte, maybe AJ Pollock.
    Mancini from Baltimore and his .364 OBP and .899 OPS from last season would go a long way towards shoring up any doubts about RF. India+Aquino for Mancini+Givens works for me.
    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. -- Carl Sagan (Pale Blue Dot)

  12. #130
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    725

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    I think my 2 trade idea of Merrifield and Mancini got both ruled out with Moose signing....had they been close to trading for either one, obviously 2b would be tagged for Whit, and now Moose will be the guy sparing Votto as oppose to Mancini.


    I wonder if we now overpay for Haniger with India and Winker...if we go after an OF with controlled years, they better not get fleeced.

  13. #131
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    18,150

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    I wonder what it would take to get Bogaerts.
    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. -- Carl Sagan (Pale Blue Dot)

  14. Likes:

    Randymack (12-06-2019)

  15. #132
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    179

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by OGB View Post
    Just curious, do you think it's over because KC is no longer looking to trade him, because the Reds don't want/need him, or other/a combination of factors?
    Kansas City has always said that they plan to keep Merrifield. That hasn't stopped the rumors however.

  16. #133
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    314

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by WrongVerb View Post
    I wonder what it would take to get Bogaerts.
    I suspect it would be a lot, but I like the target. Bogaerts had a .939 OPS last year and is signed through 2025 at a reasonable rate. I'm not too familiar with the Red Sox farm system but it doesn't look like they have any strong SS prospects on the horizon. I'm not sure if they'd bite on a Winker/Iglesias/Galvis/India type package but it's definitely worth asking.

  17. #134
    Backup First Baseman OGB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,467

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Mitri View Post
    Reds don’t have a place to play him
    I figure if you can play CF, you can play RF.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    I like Whit, the other ones don't do too much for me.

    A few interesting trade targets available for a CF-RF spot. Merrifield, Haniger, Marte, maybe AJ Pollock.
    Not even Perez if he's healthy and available?
    (Referring to Jack Hannahan signing with a Korean team)
    Since there are no teams on the moon, I guess South Korea's far enough from Cincinnati to satisfy me.
    -RichRed

  18. #135
    Member adkindo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: Offseason Trade Targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Mitri View Post
    I still like Marte for Winker/India - ish and move Senzel to LF.
    was listening to Jim Bowden on MLB channel on Sirius, he claimed the Pirates would be asking for a very rich package for Marte because he is the biggest asset to flip for their rebuild and they have plenty of time to trade him.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator