Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Lineup with Moustakas?

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,176

    Re: Lineup with Moustakas?

    Quote Originally Posted by adkindo View Post
    Winker at the top is problematic....he gets on base, but guy is just too slow.
    Well since we don't have Ricky Henderson on this team you are going to have to make some concessions...
    Last edited by DocRed; 12-04-2019 at 08:57 PM.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    18,150

    Re: Lineup with Moustakas?

    Don't sleep on Aquino. He went into a slump to begin September as the league finally adjusted to him. But he adjusted back by the middle of the month and had over .800 OPS the final two weeks.
    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. -- Carl Sagan (Pale Blue Dot)

  4. Likes:

    DocRed (12-04-2019),Ron Madden (12-04-2019),Stingray (12-04-2019)

  5. #18
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    32,055

    Re: Lineup with Moustakas?

    Quote Originally Posted by WrongVerb View Post
    Don't sleep on Aquino. He went into a slump to begin September as the league finally adjusted to him. But he adjusted back by the middle of the month and had over .800 OPS the final two weeks.
    I actually think it's smart for the Reds to give Aquino a full shot in RF and see if he can become the second coming of Jermaine Dye. But the downside risk is huge and the Reds can't win if any one of the line-up question marks (Aquino, Votto, and Senzel) come up negative at this point. I'd feel a lot better if they removed the two known drags on the offense from the equation and replaced them with players who at least had the potential to be above average. I just don't think a serious contender can run a line-up out there with three everyday players whose OPS+ will be in the below 90 range. I think that is very possible with Aquino and almost a sure thing with Barnhart and Galvis. I don't think Senzel and Votto are certain to be better than that either to be honest. The Reds need more "likely to be at least average" production to lengthen the line-up. I think that is way more important than adding a single high end bat like Betts or Lindor, though one of them would certainly be welcome. This team needs to upgrade their poor line-up spots with 3 guys who can OPS+ somewhere between 100 and 110 more than they need one guy who might OPS+ over 150.
    Last edited by mth123; 12-04-2019 at 10:38 PM.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator