Turn Off Ads?
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 64

Thread: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

  1. #31
    Member Kinsm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    5,839

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    If we are still accounting for signing bonuses, AND they get $25,000 salary, I have a lot less of an issue about things. While there are certainly guys who aren't getting much of a signing bonus, I do think that $25,000 should be a minimum starting point. It's enough to get by on, especially when for 5 months at least half of your meals are paid for by someone else while you are playing baseball. I have no issue rounding up, though. Let's do the quick math on 140 players - make it $30,000 a year. That's not even an additional $3,000,000 a year to cover that versus what they'll be paid in 2021.
    ?


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #32
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by Kinsm View Post
    ?
    $30,000 a year for 140 players is not even an additional $3,000,000 per year for each team versus what they will be paying those same 140 players in 2021 to play minor league baseball in terms of salary.

  4. #33
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    32,039

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    $30,000 a year for 140 players is not even an additional $3,000,000 per year for each team versus what they will be paying those same 140 players in 2021 to play minor league baseball in terms of salary.
    Here is the thing. For any business, $3,000,000 in straight cost is a lot of money. This isn't money being invested in players who will provide a future return they want to cut out, it's the players who are necessary, but non-value added, cost just so they can play all these minor league games. $3,000,000 for a big league player or a highly valued minor leaguer, while not always a smart investment, isn't much for the chance at a future return for the big league team. $3 Million for filler is like flushing it down the toilet

    I don't want to see all these teams disappear either, but the logic behind it makes perfect sense. If a large percentage of those players making peanuts aren't worth more, cut those teams out and let them get on with their lives. The ones still left should get paid decent money though.
    Last edited by mth123; 04-30-2020 at 12:27 PM.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  5. Likes:

    Hoosier Red (05-11-2020)

  6. #34
    Member Kinsm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    5,839

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    30K x 140 = 4.2M$....what am I misreading here?

  7. #35
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    32,039

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by Kinsm View Post
    30K x 140 = 4.2M$....what am I misreading here?
    Its not incremental. They already are making something.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  8. Likes:

    Hoosier Red (05-11-2020)

  9. #36
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by Kinsm View Post
    30K x 140 = 4.2M$....what am I misreading here?
    The nearly $1.4M that those players will be making in 2021 with the new salary structure.

  10. #37
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    Here is the thing. For any business, $3,000,000 in straight cost is a lot of money. This isn't money being invested in players who will provide a future return they want to cut out, it's the players who are necessary, but non-value added, cost just so they can play all these minor league games. $3,000,000 for a big league player or a highly valued minor leaguer, while not always a smart investment, isn't much for the chance at a future return for the big league team. $3 Million for filler is like flushing it down the toilet

    I don't want to see all these teams disappear either, but the logic behind it makes perfect sense. If a large percentage of those players making peanuts aren't worth more, cut those teams out and let them get on with their lives. The ones still left should get paid decent money though.
    If one non-prospect turns into a solid contributor for three seasons it saves a team like $15M in what they'd pay some free agent to do the same job. And the prospects can't play and develop without a lot of the "non prospects" on the field with them, either.

  11. Likes:

    REDREAD (05-01-2020)

  12. #38
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    32,039

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    If one non-prospect turns into a solid contributor for three seasons it saves a team like $15M in what they'd pay some free agent to do the same job. And the prospects can't play and develop without a lot of the "non prospects" on the field with them, either.
    They can play against other prospects with fewer teams and the non-prospects cut loose. Each organization could field 3 teams with about 90 total players and cut the bottom 50 guys loose. Chances of a non-prospect developing are really small and even with 90 payers there is plenty of room for a Tim Adelman to rise up from independent ball. The only reason all those guys are necessary is because of all the teams. Once upon a time, there was marketing value to having those teams all over the place. Now, most kids (and other fans) that actually like Baseball would rather watch big leaguers on TV or on-line than go to the minor league game to watch a bunch of no names. The marketing value of the local team has diminished a lot with technology.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  13. #39
    Member Kinsm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    5,839

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    The nearly $1.4M that those players will be making in 2021 with the new salary structure.
    I understand your math now, but why are we going with 140? Every summer, once draft signees are under contract, the Reds are always running up against their player limit of 315. Granted, 40+ have union controlled salaries.

  14. #40
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by Kinsm View Post
    I understand your math now, but why are we going with 140? Every summer, once draft signees are under contract, the Reds are always running up against their player limit of 315. Granted, 40+ have union controlled salaries.
    Well, they're about to lose about 80 spots right off the bat because Greeneville and Billings are gone. Then I went with 40 spots for the AZL, 30 each for the A-ball teams, and 20 each for the AA/AAA teams. I can't guess on how much they are paying guys that have reached free agency, and that's going to vary each year. But we can tell how much non-free agents make. That's the 140-ish guys I'm talking about.

  15. #41
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,266

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    No player is paid more than they are worth.

    But no, I still don't like your proposed scenario because players are drastically underpaid right now even if we do include their bonuses. The players are worth far more than they are being paid in both the draft and international free agency, as well as their yearly salary after they sign. We know this because until the bonuses were restricted, guys got paid a lot better than they do now in bonus terms, and well, we also know that they don't get paid anything remotely close to a reasonable yearly salary.
    Thanks for the response.
    I can understand your point that the bonus slotting has artificially kept salaries lower and killed the player's leverage. I also agree that their salary is too low.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  16. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    970

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    The answer is simple. Just do like the NFL and NBA and use college as your minor league. As to Latin American players, take them straight to the majors. For depth possibly expand the rosters to 30 or even 35.

  17. #43
    Member Kinsm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    5,839

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by TNRED View Post
    The answer is simple. Just do like the NFL and NBA and use college as your minor league. As to Latin American players, take them straight to the majors. For depth possibly expand the rosters to 30 or even 35.
    The average major league debut age has been 25 (give or take a handful of days) every year for the past 2 decades. So that would work, if players were ready at age 21 or 22 after playing in college ball, but with rare exception they just aren't.

  18. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    778

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by TNRED View Post
    The answer is simple. Just do like the NFL and NBA and use college as your minor league. As to Latin American players, take them straight to the majors. For depth possibly expand the rosters to 30 or even 35.
    8 players have gone straight from college to MLB in the last 40 years. Latin players are signed at 16 years old. The quality of play would be pitiful and it would truly turn small market teams into farm clubs for the large markets.

  19. #45
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,509

    Re: MLB Draft - new limits per Nightengale

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    Here is the thing. For any business, $3,000,000 in straight cost is a lot of money. This isn't money being invested in players who will provide a future return they want to cut out, it's the players who are necessary, but non-value added, cost just so they can play all these minor league games. $3,000,000 for a big league player or a highly valued minor leaguer, while not always a smart investment, isn't much for the chance at a future return for the big league team. $3 Million for filler is like flushing it down the toilet

    I don't want to see all these teams disappear either, but the logic behind it makes perfect sense. If a large percentage of those players making peanuts aren't worth more, cut those teams out and let them get on with their lives. The ones still left should get paid decent money though.
    Teams flush $3M down the toilet every year. That’s how much the Reds paid Jason Marquis and Kevin Gregg in 2015.

    I’d rather they flush it towards people who could use it.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  20. Likes:

    Hoosier Red (05-11-2020)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator