Nah. I didn't miss anything. You missed that the "12 studies" you referenced weren't actually studying COVID-19 and then tried to spin in into being about COVID-19.
Once again, here's what the WHO has more recently published about non-medical masks:
https://www.who.int/publications-det...ncov)-outbreak
I've given you the actual wording ad nauseam. "They don't know" is an accurate representation of the WHO position on non-medical masks. It's right there in text. If I were running around yelling,
"Masks are effective because the WHO hasn't found any evidence that they're not!", now that would be a misrepresentation of their actual position.
Now, if you'll please again direct your attention to the WHO guidance document (linked above), you'll notice a passage that I haven't posted yet (above):
As that's particularly damning to your position, why wouldn't I use it, Sea Ray? I mean, it appears that the WHO is telling us in no uncertain terms that wearing masks can limit the spread of COVID-19. Not things "such as COVID-19", but actual COVID-19. Direct quote from the WHO. More recent than the quotes from training videos you keep referencing, too.
When someone says they don't have enough information to make a recommendation for or against, what exactly do you think that means?
For example, if you asked an attorney whether or not to pursue a lawsuit and he said,
"I don't have enough information to make a recommendation for or against." would you then walk out of his office, turn to your wife and yell,
"HECK YEAH! He said GO FOR IT!!"? C'mon.