Turn Off Ads?
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 54 of 54

Thread: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

  1. #46
    My clutch is broken RichRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Western NC, by way of VB, VA
    Posts
    4,410

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    If that's your take then Candy Cummings should have already broken your spirit, I guess the point is it's a museum that is meant to celebrate and stimulate one's mind. As for Pete, lots of his stuff is in there, he's just not
    Also, the physical HOF is a fantastic place to visit for any baseball fan. If you get the chance, go see it.
    "I can make all the stadiums rock."
    -Air Supply

  2. Likes:

    westofyou (07-16-2020)


  3. Turn Off Ads?
  4. #47
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    32,055

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix2 View Post
    HOF is now irrelevant. It used to be fun to debate, but why bother now? Harold Baines is a HOFer and Pete Rose is not. So really, what's the point of it?
    And Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens...

    I understand why these guys aren't in, but if the All Time hits leader and All Time HR leader aren't in, is there any validity to any of it?
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  5. #48
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    45,857

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Advanced stats would tell you that when he stole 130 bases and got throw out 24% of he time, he would have been pretty much better off staying on the base.
    The break even point for SB% was probably in the high 70s in 1982. Rickey's Rbaser (the base running value component inside of WAR) was 11 that season. Only one player matched that running value over the past decade: Billy Hamilton in 2015. Hamilton in 2016, Elvis Andrus in 2013 and Mike Trout in 2012 all got 10s. So Rickey was helping more than hurting in the overall scheme of things. He'd become absurdly valuable on the bases when he lowered his CS% (17 for his Rbaser in both 1985 and 1988), but his 1982 was still in the high plus range. Also should be noted, his team had a lousy offense behind him in 1982. He scored 17% of their runs that season. Not a lot of reason to keep him planted when he got on base.
    I'm not a system player. I am a system.

  6. #49
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,445

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Advanced stats would tell you that when he stole 130 bases and got throw out 24% of he time, he would have been pretty much better off staying on the base.
    Nope. According to the baseruning stats at Baseball Reference, Rickey added 16 runs on the bases in 1982. However, because of those caught stealings, his net value stealing bases was "only" 5.3 runs. Worth noting, that 5.3 was 3rd in MLB behind Tim Raines (78/16) and Mookie Wilson (58/16).

    Code:
    #	YEAR	NAME			Ground	SB	Air	Hits	Other	BRR
    1.	1982	Rickey Henderson	7.2	5.3	1.3	2.5	0.1	16.3
    But yeah, making outs on the bases is really bad in terms of scoring runs...
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  7. #50
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    1,954

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Advanced stats would tell you that when he stole 130 bases and got throw out 24% of he time, he would have been pretty much better off staying on the base.
    Does advance stats tell you how many bad pitches and forced strategy of throwing fastballs to the guys coming to bat while he's on base? If he never tried to steal as you say advance stats recommends with his numbers, pitchers wouldn't have to worry and wouldn't be limited to what pitches they can throw.

    Does advance stats tell you how many of those times he was thrown out, he would've been on the front end of double play anyway?

    Does advance stats tell you how many of those games his team won even though he was thrown out, making it a non-factor since winning is the bottom line.

    Does advance stats tell you how many games the team lost but would've won if he'd not gotten thrown out stealing?

    Does advance stats tell you how many games his team would've lost if he had not stolen bases?

    Looking at it from a run scoring point, is 171 singles better than 130 doubles+41 outs which is somewhere close to what it amounted to with him getting thrown out 41 times and being successful 130 times. If he stole 3rd than subtract a double and add a triple there. Not sure and I doubt "advanced stats" is either.
    Last edited by foster15; 07-16-2020 at 03:01 PM.

  8. #51
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,143

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    We are playing the 1980 season in strat currently and it's fun because of how many runners get stranded and how many 2 run games there are compared to today. With EBH and HR's at a premium advancing a runner via steal or a sacrifice really works much better then than you'd think just viewing the game through the lens of today's game. Other odd things I've seen is pitchers aren't the same at all, you ride a starter longer because your BP arms are weaker and more prone to wildness, the walk is more manufactured due to the pitcher than the batter in most cases and it's a real crap shoot to figure out how to make it work against the mantra of today's game.

    Gonna have to try some serious garbage ball from the 1930's next

  9. Likes:

    M2 (07-16-2020)

  10. #52
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    12,512

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    We are playing the 1980 season in strat currently and it's fun because of how many runners get stranded and how many 2 run games there are compared to today. With EBH and HR's at a premium advancing a runner via steal or a sacrifice really works much better then than you'd think just viewing the game through the lens of today's game. Other odd things I've seen is pitchers aren't the same at all, you ride a starter longer because your BP arms are weaker and more prone to wildness, the walk is more manufactured due to the pitcher than the batter in most cases and it's a real crap shoot to figure out how to make it work against the mantra of today's game.

    Gonna have to try some serious garbage ball from the 1930's next
    Errors come into play, too, while range of the outfielders (their Defensive grade), probably does, too, in the low-run games.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    We are playing the 1980 season in strat currently and it's fun because of how many runners get stranded and how many 2 run games there are compared to today. With EBH and HR's at a premium advancing a runner via steal or a sacrifice really works much better then than you'd think just viewing the game through the lens of today's game. Other odd things I've seen is pitchers aren't the same at all, you ride a starter longer because your BP arms are weaker and more prone to wildness, the walk is more manufactured due to the pitcher than the batter in most cases and it's a real crap shoot to figure out how to make it work against the mantra of today's game.

    Gonna have to try some serious garbage ball from the 1930's next
    Errors come into play, too, while range of the outfielders (their Defensive grade), probably does, too, in the low-run games.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  11. #53
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    1,954

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    We are playing the 1980 season in strat currently and it's fun because of how many runners get stranded and how many 2 run games there are compared to today. With EBH and HR's at a premium advancing a runner via steal or a sacrifice really works much better then than you'd think just viewing the game through the lens of today's game. Other odd things I've seen is pitchers aren't the same at all, you ride a starter longer because your BP arms are weaker and more prone to wildness, the walk is more manufactured due to the pitcher than the batter in most cases and it's a real crap shoot to figure out how to make it work against the mantra of today's game.

    Gonna have to try some serious garbage ball from the 1930's next
    To your point, I think, back then your 3rd spot hitter tended to have less power than today. Today's 3rd hitter is usually your best hybrid as far as doubles/homers and OBP where back in 1980 they were more OBP and less HRs. So if you're a base stealer on 1st with two outs and the 3rd hitter coming up back then, it was worth trying to steal because it would most likely take back to back players getting on base(3rd hitter by via any means and 4th hitter via hit) to score otherwise. You got thrown out trying to steal, great, next inning you have high OBP guy leading off before the power comes up. Today, you take great RBI opportunity away.

  12. #54
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    45,857

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    We are playing the 1980 season in strat currently and it's fun because of how many runners get stranded and how many 2 run games there are compared to today. With EBH and HR's at a premium advancing a runner via steal or a sacrifice really works much better then than you'd think just viewing the game through the lens of today's game. Other odd things I've seen is pitchers aren't the same at all, you ride a starter longer because your BP arms are weaker and more prone to wildness, the walk is more manufactured due to the pitcher than the batter in most cases and it's a real crap shoot to figure out how to make it work against the mantra of today's game.

    Gonna have to try some serious garbage ball from the 1930's next
    Your leadoff hitter used to be your hammer.
    I'm not a system player. I am a system.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator