Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 70

Thread: offense

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    1,675

    offense

    Williams said they got new offense talent to avoid all the close games they lost last year,,

    so why bat ervin, jankowski, colon van meter and winker,, the games are close again and the bullpen is rancid

    the bullpen has already lost 3 games maybe 3 and a half counting the cubs


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Man Pills Falls City Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    31,210

    Re: offense

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Berenyi View Post
    Williams said they got new offense talent to avoid all the close games they lost last year,,

    so why bat ervin, jankowski, colon van meter and winker,, the games are close again and the bullpen is rancid

    the bullpen has already lost 3 games maybe 3 and a half counting the cubs
    Yeah, I believed and still believe that “the offense will fix it” arguments were bs. Close games are always going to be a part of baseball, regardless of your offense. You’ve got to figure out how to seal them. This FO did not do that.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Southwest Ohio
    Posts
    5,936

    Re: offense

    They bat those guys because the rules state that Moose, Cast, Shogo, and Votto can’t bat more than one time through the line up.
    “I think I throw the ball as hard as anyone. The ball just doesn't get there as fast.” — Eddie Bane

    “We know we're better than this ... but we can't prove it.” — Tony Gwynn

  5. Likes:

    Ron Madden (08-05-2020)

  6. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    1,675

    Re: offense

    thanks for elucidating that abstruse point MIke

  7. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,849

    Re: offense

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Berenyi View Post
    Williams said they got new offense talent to avoid all the close games they lost last year,,

    so why bat ervin, jankowski, colon van meter and winker,, the games are close again and the bullpen is rancid

    the bullpen has already lost 3 games maybe 3 and a half counting the cubs
    Unfortunately, Williams didn't predict a global pandemic would lead to the implementation of the DH. He shouldn't have allowed Votto, Moustakas and Senzel to be unavailable at times this year either.

  8. #6
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,445

    Re: offense

    Every time I see somebody claim that the bullpen cost us a close game I wonder, how much of that was the bullpen allowing runs and how much of it was the offense not scoring runs? The league currently scores & allows 4.44 runs per game. That's essentially 0.5 runs per half inning as the break-even average point. You could, of course, argue that relievers tend to have lower ERA than starters, but that's barely true these days. The last few years, including 2020, starters were a mere 0.1 runs per 9 better than relievers. You could also argue, persuasively I think, that better relievers are used in the close games were typically looking closely at. That's likely true. If you want to adjust that 0.5 runs per inning down to 0.4, go for it. Just do it for both the bullpen and the offense.

    So I figure it would be useful to think about the end of games in those terms.

    So case in point yesterday:
    - Bullpen allowed 4 runs in 3 innings, 2.5 runs more than the "expected" 1.5 runs. -2.5 runs (or -.5 runs if you want to not count the unearned runs against them)
    - Offense scored 0 runs in 3 innings, 1.5 fewer runs than the "expected" 1.5 runs. -1.5 runs

    So, we could look at it and say, we had a 2-0 lead and the bullpen blew it and tear into them. Narratively, sure, it describes what happened. But another way to say it is that the team had a -4 run differential in the last 3 innings, 60% of which is attributable to the bullpen and defense and 40% of which is attributable to the offense. Both under-performed and if either had done their job better, the outcome might have been different.

    I also think it's helpful to remember that players don't control when they do well or poorly. At minimum, they have MUCH MUCH MUCH more control over whether they perform well than over when they perform well. And that's on top of admitting that even if we have the best bullpen in baseball, they're still going to allow something like 0.35 runs per half inning.

    So yeah, the bullpen didn't exactly do its job yesterday. But if your team only wins close games when the bullpen is perfect, your problem goes well beyond your bullpen.

    All that said, I'm generally a believer in the idea that late game management is sort of like your lineup. Once you're within the bounds of making reasonably intelligent choices, there's not a ton to be gained from the strategy of it. The vast majority of your success or failure will come from whether or not your players perform well in their given opportunities, which is to a first approximation NOT a function of which or when their opportunities come.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  9. Likes:

    EnglishRed (08-05-2020),RedlegJake (08-05-2020),Revering4Blue (08-06-2020),Ron Madden (08-05-2020)

  10. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    1,675

    Re: offense

    thats a great point now explain why they have a slugger i n the minors and an .050 batter playing

  11. #8
    Member bm1475's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    680

    Re: offense

    Was this just a way to back into making an Aquino megathread? It kinda looks like it

  12. #9
    Member Old school 1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,269

    Re: offense

    Bruce has a point. At this juncture the DH is deadweight. Aquino was a beast for a month last year. Let’s see if he can repeat it.

  13. Likes:

    Falls City Beer (08-05-2020),malcontent (08-05-2020)

  14. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,510

    Re: offense

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    Every time I see somebody claim that the bullpen cost us a close game I wonder, how much of that was the bullpen allowing runs and how much of it was the offense not scoring runs? The league currently scores & allows 4.44 runs per game. That's essentially 0.5 runs per half inning as the break-even average point. You could, of course, argue that relievers tend to have lower ERA than starters, but that's barely true these days. The last few years, including 2020, starters were a mere 0.1 runs per 9 better than relievers. You could also argue, persuasively I think, that better relievers are used in the close games were typically looking closely at. That's likely true. If you want to adjust that 0.5 runs per inning down to 0.4, go for it. Just do it for both the bullpen and the offense.

    So I figure it would be useful to think about the end of games in those terms.

    So case in point yesterday:
    - Bullpen allowed 4 runs in 3 innings, 2.5 runs more than the "expected" 1.5 runs. -2.5 runs (or -.5 runs if you want to not count the unearned runs against them)
    - Offense scored 0 runs in 3 innings, 1.5 fewer runs than the "expected" 1.5 runs. -1.5 runs

    So, we could look at it and say, we had a 2-0 lead and the bullpen blew it and tear into them. Narratively, sure, it describes what happened. But another way to say it is that the team had a -4 run differential in the last 3 innings, 60% of which is attributable to the bullpen and defense and 40% of which is attributable to the offense. Both under-performed and if either had done their job better, the outcome might have been different.

    I also think it's helpful to remember that players don't control when they do well or poorly. At minimum, they have MUCH MUCH MUCH more control over whether they perform well than over when they perform well. And that's on top of admitting that even if we have the best bullpen in baseball, they're still going to allow something like 0.35 runs per half inning.

    So yeah, the bullpen didn't exactly do its job yesterday. But if your team only wins close games when the bullpen is perfect, your problem goes well beyond your bullpen.

    All that said, I'm generally a believer in the idea that late game management is sort of like your lineup. Once you're within the bounds of making reasonably intelligent choices, there's not a ton to be gained from the strategy of it. The vast majority of your success or failure will come from whether or not your players perform well in their given opportunities, which is to a first approximation NOT a function of which or when their opportunities come.
    The Reds spent large sums last off-season trying to fix the offense. They did not do much of substance to improve the late inning relief.

    So while both areas share in losing close games, it’s harder to swallow continued bullpen issues. With the offense, well they certainly tried.

  15. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,176

    Re: offense

    Awfull

  16. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,041

    Re: offense

    Frustrating so far for sure. But they seem to be unlucky with BABIP (29th in MLB) and we're 12 games with a stop-and-start spring training. I know it's a short season, but sometimes I remember that normally we'd be at like April 15 right now.
    "In our sundown perambulations of late, through the outer parts of Brooklyn, we have observed several parties of youngsters playing 'base', a certain game of ball. Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our close rooms, the game of ball is glorious"
    -Walt Whitman

  17. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    193

    Re: offense

    I said it in week 1 that the offense was a major concern and everybody said it was “early.” Well it’s not so early
    Anymore after already playing 1/6 of the schedule. They cannot hit outside of the occasional home run. They look no better than last season when the offense was dreadful.

  18. #14
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,145

    Re: offense

    Small Sample sizes know nothing about short seasons's

    Be prepared is all I can think

  19. Likes:

    Revering4Blue (08-06-2020),Ron Madden (08-05-2020)

  20. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    193

    Re: offense

    Reds currently rank 23rd in team batting average after ranking 24th last season with a higher BA. This just shows that nobody on this team can get on base or hit outside of hitting a HR.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator