You don't have a right to employment in this country. I think you probably should (and it's not that weird an idea historically), but I understand that it's not a popular point of view.
You know with 100% certainty that there are going to be a ton of religious and health carve-outs if employers try to do this (and they mostly won't), and yet you're still worried? Really?
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
NYT? This was an image posted to this website of a ***** child.
That’s not the NYT. And again, who said anything about employer? This is my personal phone. Who said anything about problematic? You are trying very hard to make this a culture war/woke thing and that’s really not it.
In the age of #metoo we really cannot comprehend why someone would not want an image of a kid like that on their internet history? This wasn’t embedded in an NYT article. It was an image only posted to a message board.
Last edited by RedTeamGo!; 11-30-2020 at 11:30 AM.
What would you say.....ya do here?
757690 (11-30-2020),Revering4Blue (11-30-2020)
I was responding to BostonRed's post. I honestly know no idea who is seaching your web history or why you care. You should leave your comfy little safe space and live for a while in a place where they monitor everything.
Again, your statement was very weird. There is nothing wrong with having a historical link in your browser history.
Last edited by BernieCarbo; 11-30-2020 at 11:35 AM.
Falls City Beer (11-30-2020),Rojo (11-30-2020)
BernieCarbo (11-30-2020)
You are the one that is making it about a naked child. That in itself is creepy beyond belief, much more than the picture.
I remember when I lived in Germany, and I visited Dachau once. It is far more preserved than any other former camp such as Auschwitz, and respectfully but accurately done. So many of my friends afterward told me "How can you go there? I wish people would just forget about it!" And these were people in their 20s and 30s.
The world is yucky, so get over it and stop acting so Mormon.
It wasn’t a historical link. It was an image posted to this site of a child with absolutely no context.
Oh god, everything has to be about safe space. I tend to not like looking at pictures of little kids like that and don’t want it anywhere near my internet history. Maybe you do like to look at pictures like that.
What would you say.....ya do here?
No one click on this link to a February 17, 2020 article from the NYT. IT is in there. Wouldn't want to corrupt that browser history!
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/o...n-nick-ut.html
- - - Updated - - -
Uh, Mormons are nice.
It's a famous photo that I have seen so much that I can close my eyes and see it... it is that famous.
But the full comparison Rojo is making is apples to oranges to me.
Kinsm (11-30-2020),mth123 (11-30-2020),Redsfaithful (11-30-2020),Revering4Blue (11-30-2020),WrongVerb (12-01-2020)
Hoping to change my username to 75769023
THERE WAS NO CONTEXT WITH THE PICTURE. It was just a picture of a child. I saw the picture and immediately closed the thread. Creepy? Jesus Christ.
And by the way old man, I could not care less you lived in Germany. You’ve mentioned it a million times. Who cares.
- - - Updated - - -
For the hundredth time, I had no idea what the photo was and it was not a link to the NYT. It was just an image. I closed the thread immediately when I saw it.
What would you say.....ya do here?
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |