And also at face value, teams don’t trade good pitchers with over a season of control left for below average rental outfielders. They trade them for young power hitting pre arb outfielders and starting pitching prospects.
I also remember pretty much the whole board acknowledging that the Reds were likely going to trade Puig at the deadline at the time, and that they weren’t going to get much for him considering how he played, his remaining salary and the fact that it was only 2 months of him. It seems like there’s a ton of revisionist history going on to paint him as an indispensable part of that deal.