CarolinaRedleg (04-22-2021),DocRed (04-22-2021),ochoa30 (04-22-2021),REDREAD (04-22-2021),RedsFanInMS (04-22-2021)
*BaseClogger* (04-22-2021),757690 (04-22-2021),CarolinaRedleg (04-22-2021),Chip R (04-23-2021),GAC (04-22-2021),Mitri (04-22-2021),OGB (04-22-2021),Revering4Blue (04-22-2021)
cincinnati chili (04-22-2021),mth123 (04-22-2021)
Fulmer relieved Garrett and pitched fine. He has a 0.90 ERA. C. Perez followed and pitched fine, he got a fly out, he gave up an intentional walk because he inherited a runner on second, then got a ground ball that Blandino blundered. He was then relieved by DeLeon who imploded. Romano was available too.
I am guessing any of those besides DeLeon would have been able to pitch a 9th inning without giving up 3 runs.
Hoping to change my username to 75769024
DocRed (04-22-2021),Old school 1983 (04-22-2021)
Dancing swag guys are very annoying when they suck
Bob Sheed (04-22-2021),DocRed (04-22-2021),malcontent (04-22-2021),REDREAD (04-22-2021)
I was OK with Bell going to AG tonight. If you make a decision to give a guy a job/role, you need to give him a reasonable chance with it. Even with his bad start I felt he should have gotten the ball— it’s as “easy” as a save situation gets. This was a lower stress situation while still mattering. I am fine giving AG the ball. Obviously, he blew the chance. Now it’s clear he’s all kinds of messed up and probably shouldn’t be thrown into any situations where the game is in doubt or Reds have the lead. In other words, starting now, if Bell goes to AG I think the results are on Bell. I think at this point you have to slip AG more into the Sal Romano role, even if it hurts AG’s feelings.
mth123 (04-22-2021),REDREAD (04-22-2021),Shoeless Jeff (04-22-2021)
This is the burden “dancing swag guys” carry. Not only do I not mind the bravado, I enjoy it. Personalities make the game more fun. I have no issue with AG’s antics, other than occasionally they come off a little contrived. But overall, no issue with it. But yes, if things go bad, those things do tend to come back to you and the bravado-guy has to tuck tail a bit when he’s getting shelled. As long as he’s able to stand up to it (which AG did in the post game) then so be it.
Last edited by GAC; 04-22-2021 at 03:56 AM.
"In my day you had musicians who experimented with drugs. Now it's druggies experimenting with music" - Alfred G Clark (circa 1972)
Old school 1983 (04-22-2021)
Remember that neither Garrett nor Sims had much work in Spring Training. Hopefully getting more innings under Garrett's belt will allow him to find his rhythm for the rest of the season.
congrats (by default) on becoming the reds' new closer, lucas sims!
You guys are acting like Bell put Garrett in the game with the bases loaded. He came into the game with a THREE RUN lead and no baserunners. Not exactly a pressure situation. Garrett made it into one himself.
Chip R (04-23-2021),Crumbley (04-22-2021),DocRed (04-22-2021),Old school 1983 (04-22-2021),REDREAD (04-22-2021),RiverRat13 (04-22-2021)
Exactly, This is a roster construction failure. They dumped the experienced relievers who close games and handed the job to a match up lefty. Talking like a tough guy doesn't equate to having what it takes to close out games. The off-season plan was to dump those guys with no established replacements and move the internal guys up a notch. The "Peter Principle" is alive and well in the Reds bullpen. Antone and Sims can't cover 4 innings every game.
Amir Garrett is responsible for both of these losses. In the suspended game, he even blew it matched up against lefty batters. I think his head is messed up by being made the "closer." Not sure how long it will take to get him back to being useful, but a razor thin bullpen just got thinner IMO. Time to try a different experiment IMO. Experimenting in the late innings of close games isn't really a good plan for contending.
All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!
REDREAD (04-22-2021)
I agree. Bell giving the Ball to Garrett was the organizational plan when they stripped the pen of the guys with closing experience. It's too early in the season for teh Manager to veer from that plan. I've always thought it was a lousy plan, but that's the plan the team made when they constructed this razor thin bullpen. I don't blame Bell at all. This is a personnel problem, not a Manager strategy problem.
All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!
REDREAD (04-22-2021)
The only guy Garrett should be above on the bullpen depth chart is Romano right now.
Personally, I think he is too amped up in this "closer" role. DJ came out, Garrett got control of his body and threw 2 good pitches for strikes, then he went back to flailing while trying to throw 100.
"Today was the byproduct of us thinking we can come back from anything." - Joey Votto after blowing a 10-1 lead and holding on for the 12-11 win on 8/25/2010.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |