I think they only got a hitting coach, but don't quote me.
I start on Medicare end of this week. And as far back as I can remember it's good to see one aspect of the game hasn't changed ... the SLUMP! I got to witness some good ones in my time, and not just Reds either, but among the greats. We still ain't figured it out. What causes them. And why they can so quickly disappear as quick as they came. An enigma wrapped in a riddle.
Has anyone written a baseball book on The Slump? We've seen all kinds on hitting, pitching, fielding, coaching, even best ballparks. And written by managers, ex-players, and media pundits, drawing on years of experience, explaining what they know and understand. And that, IMO, is why there aren't any books on the Slump.
I'd have a better chance of explaining black holes to you then the dynamics of The Slump.
Unless there is injury involved, or some other "mitigating circumstances" are a factor, forcing the decision to bench .... leave him in there. I've already stated that I didn't like the move to SS. And after being at the game last Thursday and watching him? Lets say he's not the answer. But IMO I think they knew that too, but what they hell! They were saving money!
But if they are committed to keeping him at SS, that they believe with time he'll improve as he's out there daily
playing the position, not sitting the bench ... then, IMO, the same logic should be applied when it comes to his bat. Benching him does what again? Clear his head? Help him get it together? As an ex-ballpayer - sorry if I sound like Tracy Jones (lol) - when I was not playing well, the last thing I wanted as an established starter was benched. Sitting on the bench gave you too much time to think/dwell on it, and certainly wasn't affording me the opportunity to work through it. I'll assume Suarez w/ the hitting coach, is (or should be) out there in the cages every day working on it. Where is he suppose to "test" what he's doing, to see if it's working, if not on the playing field vs the opponent?
We're talking an established starter. Someone who has proven himself, has a track record. I, personally, throw out the entire '20 season performance/statistically on every ballplayer. It was one stress-filled, screwed up year due to the pandemic, Stay-at-Home orders, economic shutdown, 2,000+ daily deaths .... Lets play ball! Just too much.
It's the beginning of the season. It's April. It's 20 games. Lots of players have slow starts, bad Aprils. I remember Larkin having some.
With Moose out they had a chance to put Suarez back at 3B temporarily, give him a little break from the position, and use one of the four Stooges at SS. BUt then, maybe they thought that may make things worse for Geno?