The last team to win the Super Bowl without a strong passing game was probably the 2012-13 Baltimore Ravens. But, that team had guys like Ray Rice and Ed Reed on defense.Originally Posted by Todd Gack
The last team to win the Super Bowl without a strong passing game was probably the 2012-13 Baltimore Ravens. But, that team had guys like Ray Rice and Ed Reed on defense.
Revering4Blue (10-04-2022)
If you project his first four game numbers out to the full season, Jackson would throw for 3,795 yards and 47 TDs.
And they won the Super Bowl because the passing game went on an incredible hot streak
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kingspoint (10-04-2022)
Brady is getting a divorce.
If those two can’t make it, what hope is there for the rest of us?
Seriously though, kinda wonder if his mental health is all there. He’s essentially picked football over family the last two offseasons and the last one was pretty well publicized.
Chip R (10-05-2022)
Somehow I think both Tom and the soon to be former Mrs will both be just fine.
Kingspoint (10-05-2022),redsfandan (10-06-2022),Sea Ray (10-05-2022)
The difference between Lamar's regular and postseason numbers is what really matters.
Lamar Jackson in 4 Playoff Games:
76/136 = 55%
3 TD/ 5 INT
Sacked 19 times
1 Rushing TD
5 fumbles (2 lost)
Please. Why would anyone guarantee someone 200+ million with these playoff stats?
Last edited by Todd Gack; 10-04-2022 at 10:26 PM.
redsfandan (10-06-2022)
Yea, I’ve wondered the same. Guy is 45 and has tons of money and 7 Super Bowl rings. It’s not like he’s never won the big one.
Meanwhile his wife (soon to be ex I suppose) basically put her career on hold to raise their kids. I’ve gotta think the whole “Will he / won’t he” act for a while that culminated into “Yes I’m retiring” only to be followed by “Just kidding I’m not retiring” might have been enough to push her over the edge.
Phil Castellini puts the FUN in Trust Fund.
Kingspoint (10-05-2022),RiverRat13 (10-05-2022)
I’ve always compared Brady to Brett Favre in that sense.
I'm pretty sure Brady told the world a long time ago that his goal was to play to 45. Here he is. Shouldn't really surprise anyone.
I can't really blame him. Personally, I find it hard to believe you wouldn't have to drag me away if I was able to keep competing at the highest level in the sport I love. If that's not cool with Giselle, I don't blame her either. It is what it is.
I've always thought that Schefter breaking his retirement was the reason he came back. He wanted to control how and when he did it and when the story broke, he got mad and came back out of spite. I wouldn't count him out, though. Had a great game against KC with his usual assistance from the refs. In that conference, anyone could win it all. Why not Brady?
Why did he retire at all then? He announced his retirement after Schefter broke it. If he wanted to stick it to Schefter he should have not retired at all
Cole Beasley is apparently trying to avoid the "Brady situation". He retired today.
Giselle knows a sinking ship when she sees one.
Cole Beasley jumped off today, retiring after two games with the Bucs.
- - - Updated - - -
Giselle knows a sinking ship when she sees one.
Cole Beasley jumped off today, retiring after two games with the Bucs. (Beat me to it, BostonRed)
Beasley should retire after that horrendous drop on Sunday. Isaiah McKenzie showed Beasley last season he should have retired then.
"One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
