Turn Off Ads?
Page 5 of 67 FirstFirst 1234567891555 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 1002

Thread: NCAA Football 2022

  1. #61
    Member adkindo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by RedTeamGo! View Post
    I dont remember a lot of these SEC/Southern football fans saying a word when OU and Texas went to the SEC but now USC and UCLA are going to the big ten: "College football is ruined"
    honestly....you must not have been listening...and I am not trying to be rude but the "outrage" was much louder about the SEC taking on Oklahoma and Texas. I think most people are just numb to it at this point.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by WVRed View Post
    I think the SEC goes for UNC next. Football is solid and basketball would be huge plus getting into that media market. Could see Virginia and/or Va Tech. Which leaves NC State or Duke and I think the SEC takes Raleigh and football over Dukes horrible football program despite basketball.
    maybe, but I would speculate that if the ACC gets raided, UNC and Virginia will be Big10 bound. They kind of look down on the SEC academically.
    “The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
    ― Marcus Aurelius


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #62
    Member adkindo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by WVRed View Post
    It’s not ruined anymore than it was a year ago. The entire landscape has shifted.

    What’s funny is that a year ago the B1G, PAC-12, and Big 12 got together in an “alliance” against the SEC and apparently it meant nothing.
    they know the color of each others eyes
    “The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
    ― Marcus Aurelius

  4. #63
    Member adkindo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by WVRed View Post
    Those three are also AAU schools so they fit that blueprint. Guess it depends on who calls first. I’d imagine the B1G is going to expand west.
    If given the choice, I think the BIG10 would much rather expand into SEC country.....but it would take a UVa or UNC to get their attention.
    “The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
    ― Marcus Aurelius

  5. #64
    Member adkindo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    I read the SEC will possess 7 of the 10 most profitable brands in college athletics (once Texas joins).....I assume the other 3 are Ohio State, Michigan and Notre Dame?

    - - - Updated - - -

    still cannot imagine the Big 10 Presidents will be able to control themselves with Stanford and Cal just setting out there....
    “The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
    ― Marcus Aurelius

  6. #65
    Winning is fun. RiverRat13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,966

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    AAU schools that the B1G could target: Oregon, Washington, Stanford, Cal, UNC, Duke, UVA, Georgia Tech. That gets them to 24, gets them into the Southeast, and gets them control of the West Coast. Lesser AAU possibilities but wouldn't surprise me: Colorado and Utah. Longshot AAU schools: Pitt, Arizona, and Missouri.

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  7. #66
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,852

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverRat13 View Post
    AAU schools that the B1G could target: Oregon, Washington, Stanford, Cal, UNC, Duke, UVA, Georgia Tech. That gets them to 24, gets them into the Southeast, and gets them control of the West Coast. Lesser AAU possibilities but wouldn't surprise me: Colorado and Utah. Longshot AAU schools: Pitt, Arizona, and Missouri.
    I feel like the only way Stanford definitely receives an invite is that it was contingent on Notre Dame agreeing to join the conference. If Notre Dame doesn't request that, why not add Oregon, Washington and then one of Colorado, Utah, Arizona rather than Stanford? Those are the three large Pac-12 AAU schools in growing states.

  8. #67
    Winning is fun. RiverRat13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,966

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by Coopdaddy67 View Post
    I feel like the only way Stanford definitely receives an invite is that it was contingent on Notre Dame agreeing to join the conference. If Notre Dame doesn't request that, why not add Oregon, Washington and then one of Colorado, Utah, Arizona rather than Stanford? Those are the three large Pac-12 AAU schools in growing states.
    Stanford and Cal have a ton of research money. The B1G presidents would love to have them in the Big Ten Academic Alliance. And my understanding is that Cal and Stanford are a package deal.

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  9. Likes:

    adkindo (07-02-2022),dfs (07-01-2022)

  10. #68
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,852

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverRat13 View Post
    Stanford and Cal have a ton of research money. The B1G presidents would love to have them in the Big Ten Academic Alliance. And my understanding is that Cal and Stanford are a package deal.
    The Presidents may want them for academic reasons, but I doubt they add anything to the tv rights deal, which would be a deal breaker.

  11. #69
    Winning is fun. RiverRat13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,966

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by Coopdaddy67 View Post
    The Presidents may want them for academic reasons, but I doubt they add anything to the tv rights deal, which would be a deal breaker.
    Northern California has 15 million people, more than any current B1G state. And there are a ton of B1G alumni living in that area. They would add plenty to the TV rights deal.

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  12. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,852

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverRat13 View Post
    Northern California has 15 million people, more than any current B1G state. And there are a ton of B1G alumni living in that area. They would add plenty to the TV rights deal
    They just got USC and UCLA, which are the main schools currently/historically for football and basketball. They don't have to add more California schools to get access to that.

    Edit: The reason the Pac-12 couldn't sniff the tv rights of the SEC, Big Ten, etc. is because their footprint all overlaps. They're currently getting just over $20 mil a year. That's already being doubled by the Big Ten and SEC. The Big Ten could approach $100 mil once they negotiate next year.

    Also, the SEC and Big Ten networks blow the Pac-12 Network out of the water, which continues to struggle. Their regional network only has 8.5 mil subscribers as of last year and it was falling. The national total was less than 15 million. It's basically a step above the Longhorn Network and that was before their two marquee programs left.
    Last edited by Coopdaddy67; 07-01-2022 at 05:01 PM.

  13. Likes:

    *BaseClogger* (07-02-2022),Revering4Blue (07-01-2022)

  14. #71
    Winning is fun. RiverRat13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,966

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by Coopdaddy67 View Post
    They just got USC and UCLA, which are the main schools currently/historically for football and basketball. They don't have to add more California schools to get access to that.

    Edit: The reason the Pac-12 couldn't sniff the tv rights of the SEC, Big Ten, etc. is because their footprint all overlaps. They're currently getting just over $20 mil a year. That's already being doubled by the Big Ten and SEC. The Big Ten could approach $100 mil once they negotiate next year.

    Also, the SEC and Big Ten networks blow the Pac-12 Network out of the water, which continues to struggle. Their regional network only has 8.5 mil subscribers as of last year and it was falling. The national total was less than 15 million. It's basically a step above the Longhorn Network and that was before their two marquee programs left.
    I might have agreed with this had the B1G not taken Maryland and Rutgers to try to get into the NY and DC markets. They would absolutely love to get the SF and Northern California markets. The other part of the TV puzzle is the sheer number of B1G alumni who live there. This was also part of the thinking of with Maryland and Rutgers. When OSU played Cal a few years ago, it looked like Berkeley had been invaded. So while that part of the country may not have enough Stanford and Cal fans on the surface, it does have enough Stanford, Cal, and (insert B1G school) fans to move the TV needle.

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  15. #72
    The pride is back. Assembly Hall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Warsaw, IN
    Posts
    2,881

    Re: NCAA Football 2022


  16. Likes:

    Danny Serafini (07-01-2022)

  17. #73
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,852

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverRat13 View Post
    I might have agreed with this had the B1G not taken Maryland and Rutgers to try to get into the NY and DC markets. They would absolutely love to get the SF and Northern California markets. The other part of the TV puzzle is the sheer number of B1G alumni who live there. This was also part of the thinking of with Maryland and Rutgers. When OSU played Cal a few years ago, it looked like Berkeley had been invaded. So while that part of the country may not have enough Stanford and Cal fans on the surface, it does have enough Stanford, Cal, and (insert B1G school) fans to move the TV needle.
    College football, markets and tv deals have changed dramatically over the last decade since Maryland/Rutgers joined the Big Ten. Conferences care about brands more than ever now.

    The Big Ten is still going to get into the markets throughout California. Again, they don't need all the other California schools for that. If it mattered, the Pac-12 wouldn't be struggling and USC/UCLA wouldn't have even considered leaving.

  18. Likes:

    Revering4Blue (07-01-2022)

  19. #74
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    62,142

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    Quote Originally Posted by adkindo View Post
    honestly....you must not have been listening...and I am not trying to be rude but the "outrage" was much louder about the SEC taking on Oklahoma and Texas. I think most people are just numb to it at this point.

    - - - Updated - - -



    maybe, but I would speculate that if the ACC gets raided, UNC and Virginia will be Big10 bound. They kind of look down on the SEC academically.
    We also heard forever that Texas would never join the SEC due to academics.
    Go Gators!

  20. #75
    Member bm1475's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    680

    Re: NCAA Football 2022

    The idea behind adding a market is to get your conference TV network onto the basic cable tier and out of the optional tiers so you can get higher rights fees. Northern California cable systems aren't going to feel pressure to add the Big Ten Network to their basic tier because of USC and UCLA. Cal and Stanford would change that equation.

  21. Likes:

    Chip R (07-02-2022),RiverRat13 (07-02-2022)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator