With the draft approaching, this seems like a good time to discuss how the Reds might best realize a home field advantage. IMO, Dick Williams took a shot at it when he acquired Moose and emphasized a swing that would produce fly balls to take advantage of the hitter friendly right field stands. That, plus high K pitchers should have worked. The problem was that in the post season, when teams face a stable of top starters and relievers, the reliance on the HR worked poorly.
So, what would work best? I'll post a straw man to get the discussion started and draw some RZ fire in the process. IMO, the Reds should strive to win the OBP stat. Accordingly, they should pursue contact oriented hitters with speed who put the ball in play. Speed will help to manufacture runs in close post season games. They should give priority to infielders. Infielders can be moved to the outfield if they are fast. They are likely to have fewer HR's than opposing teams, but contact oriented hitters won't be without some HR's in GABP. On the pitching side, ground ball percent should be a priority. I like the K's as much as the next person, but K's take more pitches and risk more injuries from high effort pitches. Ground ball pitchers are more likely to keep the ball in a small ball park and go further into games. Clearly, if the Reds are to win the OBP stat, pitchers need to throw strikes as well. BB percentage needs to be low. Sacrificing velocity for control should be favored.
This strategy runs counter to the high HR, high K pitcher strategy that seems to dominate today's game, but, hey, I'm desperate for an alternative approach that will result in wins in a ball park that has not played to the advantage of the Reds.