Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 30 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 441

Thread: The futility thread.. 100, 102 loss watch

  1. #1
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,273

    The futility thread.. 100, 102 loss watch

    Since Castillo is gone and apparently 4-5 other guys are on the block, I think the Reds are back into contention for 100 losses or 102 losses (which I think makes them the worst Reds team ever)
    This is not intending to complain about Castillo being gone, just watching the scoreboard, kind of like the old "draft pick" watch threads. I know there's a draft lotto now, but I think it's weighted like the NBA, so we can mention what position the Reds are relative to the rest of MLB

    So today:
    38-61 .384 winning percentage.
    63 games left to play.
    If the Reds go 24-39 in the rest of their games (.381 winning percentage), they hit 100 losses.

    Currently, the following teams have worse W-L than the Reds:
    Oakland .382, Nats .337

    Close to the Reds futility
    KC .386, Pirates .400
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,550

    Re: The futility thread.. 100, 102 loss watch

    They will after Pham, Drury and maybe Farmer gut the offense... what else will they have to call up they will not want to start the arbiration clock.. ugh sign more junk off the dumpster heep?

  4. Likes:

    REDREAD (07-30-2022)

  5. #3
    Man Pills Falls City Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    31,208

    Re: The futility thread.. 100, 102 loss watch

    I thought the Reds might avoid 100 losses (and they still might) but I’d say the odds are inching up on 50/50.

    - - - Updated - - -
    “And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith

  6. Likes:

    REDREAD (07-30-2022)

  7. #4
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,273

    Re: The futility thread.. 100, 102 loss watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    I thought the Reds might avoid 100 losses (and they still might) but I’d say the odds are inching up on 50/50.

    - - - Updated - - -
    I thought they'd also avoid 100 losses too.
    Maybe even if they traded Castillo too.
    But if they are going to go full burn down, trading Mahle and even decent supporting guys like Naquin, Drury, etc , I think it's highly likely they will hit 100 losses.
    The post trade deadline lineup is going to be brutal if they trade off most of the supporting pieces that are rumored to be up for trade. Aquino? Maybe Moose starts every day at 3b?
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  8. #5
    Member KeefeCato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    2,930

    Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    No? Yes? Depends on who is traded by Tuesday?

  9. Likes:

    REDREAD (08-01-2022)

  10. #6
    Ken Griffey Jr. The Kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    NKY
    Posts
    88

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    Yes... they've been .500 ball since the horrible start. Seems like the bats have woken up enough to keep the 100 losses at bay.
    “As long as I have fun playing, the stats will take care of themselves.”
    -- Ken Griffey, Jr.

  11. Likes:

    757690 (07-30-2022),KeefeCato (07-30-2022),Old school 1983 (08-01-2022),REDREAD (08-01-2022)

  12. #7
    Member RedsFanInMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    571

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    With Castillo gone and most likely Mahle, it's going to be close. I'm saying we skirt bu at 63-99.

  13. Likes:

    KeefeCato (07-31-2022),REDREAD (08-01-2022)

  14. #8
    Winning is fun. RiverRat13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,947

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    Who gets shut down in September? Lodolo needs innings so he shouldn't. I don't think Ashcraft needs to but he might. I'd expect Greene to be.

  15. Likes:

    KeefeCato (07-31-2022),REDREAD (08-01-2022)

  16. #9
    Member HammerTime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    NKY
    Posts
    1,628

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    Not without Castillo and Mahle. Last month of the season could be brutal with guys being shut down.

  17. Likes:

    KeefeCato (07-31-2022),REDREAD (08-01-2022)

  18. #10
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    18,369

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    Maybe. Depends on who is left once the smoke clears.

    Not to be gloomy, but why does it matter? What’s the difference between 99 losses and 100 losses? (yeah I know, one game). Once you’re committed to the path the Reds have chosen, wins and losses are secondary. Development of players is primary.
    She used to wake me up with coffee ever morning

  19. Likes:

    KeefeCato (07-31-2022),KronoRed (07-31-2022),Revering4Blue (07-30-2022),Ron Madden (07-30-2022)

  20. #11
    Member Ron Madden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    22,097

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    Like WOY said last night: 100 losses used to be uncommon.

    They're not uncommon anymore 100 is just another number now days

  21. Likes:

    Banshee (07-31-2022),HokieRed (07-31-2022),KeefeCato (07-31-2022)

  22. #12
    Member ckroynovich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Greenville, PA
    Posts
    21

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Kid View Post
    ... Seems like the bats have woken up enough to keep the 100 losses at bay.
    9 against the Cubs, 10 with Pittsburgh, 3 with Colorado, and 3 with the Nats so they have a good chance to feast on enough AAA/AAAA pitching to avoid 100 losses.

  23. Likes:

    Chip R (08-11-2022),KeefeCato (07-31-2022),mth123 (07-31-2022),REDREAD (08-01-2022)

  24. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    1,954

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy Tucker View Post
    Maybe. Depends on who is left once the smoke clears.

    Not to be gloomy, but why does it matter? What’s the difference between 99 losses and 100 losses? (yeah I know, one game). Once you’re committed to the path the Reds have chosen, wins and losses are secondary. Development of players is primary.
    Agree. 100, no big deal. Now, 108, that would be embarrassing. That means for every 3 games played, you lost 2 of them.

  25. Likes:

    KeefeCato (07-31-2022)

  26. #14
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    If the Reds continue their pace since their horrid 3-22 start, they will end up 68-93.

    Their goal shouldn’t be to not lose 100 games, but to win 70 games. That is just 2 games better than that pace. I think it’s doable.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  27. Likes:

    KeefeCato (07-31-2022),Ron Madden (07-31-2022)

  28. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,550

    Re: Can the Reds go 24-38 to avoid 100 losses?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Kid View Post
    Yes... they've been .500 ball since the horrible start. Seems like the bats have woken up enough to keep the 100 losses at bay.
    When the bats like Drury and Pham and maybe Farmer are traded, no way they cant avoid 100 losses

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by The Kid View Post
    Yes... they've been .500 ball since the horrible start. Seems like the bats have woken up enough to keep the 100 losses at bay.
    When the bats like Drury and Pham and maybe Farmer are traded, no way they cant avoid 100 losses

  29. Likes:

    KeefeCato (07-31-2022),REDREAD (08-01-2022)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator