Turn Off Ads?
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 63

Thread: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

  1. #31
    Member Bourgeois Zee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    12,814

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    I’d just note that CES - whom I like - has a troubling K/BB ratio. At Reds AA he struck out 26% and walked 4%. Slightly better with Twins AA.
    Encarnacion-Strand's hit tool seems to be much, much better. Too, in A+, CES walked nearly 10% of the time.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,506

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourgeois Zee View Post
    Encarnacion-Strand's hit tool seems to be much, much better. Too, in A+, CES walked nearly 10% of the time.
    I’m always concerned with guys with big K/BB splits. CES did at both AA stops. Major league pitchers will take advantage.

    CES does have near perfect batted ball distribution. His LD rate is probably unsustainably high. But I will give him credit there, helps with his BABIP and BA. MM a bit fly ball heavy, LD rate a bit low.

  4. #33
    Member Bourgeois Zee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    12,814

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    I’m always concerned with guys with big K/BB splits. CES did at both AA stops. Major league pitchers will take advantage.

    CES does have near perfect batted ball distribution. His LD rate is probably unsustainably high. But I will give him credit there, helps with his BABIP and BA. MM a bit fly ball heavy, LD rate a bit low.
    Big splits? His career K and BB ratios are pretty normal, IIRC. (EDIT: around 7:25)

    Why are his LD rates unsustainable?

    He's seemingly always hit the ball well and hard. In college too-- monster numbers. His exit velocities are among the best in minor league baseball, fwiw.

    There's just not much there-- beyond pedigree-- to believe he'll stop hitting as well as he has.
    Last edited by Bourgeois Zee; 10-08-2022 at 03:39 PM.

  5. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,506

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourgeois Zee View Post
    Big splits? His career K and BB ratios are pretty normal, IIRC. (EDIT: around 7:25)

    Why are his LD rates unsustainable?

    He's seemingly always hit the ball well and hard. In college too-- monster numbers. His exit velocities are among the best in minor league baseball, fwiw.

    There's just not much there-- beyond pedigree-- to believe he'll stop hitting as well as he has.
    Lifetime minor league stats include the lower levels. Look at AA. Big splits. An issue. (Also was an issue at low A.)

    28% LD rate is off the charts. Joey Votto lifetime is 25%. 28% is higher than every qualified major leaguer this year (highest, Freemen 27.5). Very likely unsustainable as he advances.
    Last edited by Kc61; 10-08-2022 at 03:47 PM.

  6. #35
    Member Bourgeois Zee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    12,814

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    Lifetime minor league stats include the lower levels. Look at AA. Big splits. An issue. (Also was an issue at low A.)

    28% LD rate is off the charts. Joey Votto lifetime is 25%. 28% is higher than every qualified major leaguer this year (highest, Freemen 27.5). Very likely unsustainable as he advances.
    Small samples abound.

    And while he may not have a 28% LD rate, he will continue to hit the ball hard. That's a skill that's unlikely to drop significantly.

    He won't hit .317 in the majors, but he'll probably hit above .280 with serious .500-.550 SLG. That in itself will allow him to OBP .350 (as pitchers pitch around him). A .280/.350/.500 hitter has monster value in today's game-- especially on a team that produced exactly none of them last year.

  7. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,506

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourgeois Zee View Post
    Small samples abound.

    And while he may not have a 28% LD rate, he will continue to hit the ball hard. That's a skill that's unlikely to drop significantly.

    He won't hit .317 in the majors, but he'll probably hit above .280 with serious .500-.550 SLG. That in itself will allow him to OBP .350 (as pitchers pitch around him). A .280/.350/.500 hitter has monster value in today's game-- especially on a team that produced exactly none of them last year.
    Every prospect rankings I’ve seen downgrades CES from his performance numbers. There’s concern about his longish swing and his defensive limitations. This includes MLB, BA, RedsMinorLeagues. So I’m not alone in having a wait and see attitude. I can’t deny that he’s crushed minor league pitching so far, so maybe it will all pan out. Hope so.

  8. #37
    Member Bourgeois Zee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    12,814

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    Every prospect rankings I’ve seen downgrades CES from his performance numbers. There’s concern about his longish swing and his defensive limitations.
    Don't care much about prospect rankings and care not at all about defensive limitations when discussing the offense a prospect might possess.

    I only saw one "long-ish swing" comment and that was an amateur scouting report from BP. Of the six I saw, five praised his swing as "thunderous", "to the point," and "good bat-to-ball skills." In short, I'm unworried about his swing mechanics. If there's a worry about his offensive game, it's that he'll chase pitches out of the zone. That said, he has enough power to still be of use. He's also already shown a penchant for tinkering postively with his swing. That shows me something, as does his willingness to learn from coaching.

    I suspect CES is and will continue to be seriously underrated by national pundits.

  9. Likes:

    Old school 1983 (10-09-2022)

  10. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,506

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourgeois Zee View Post
    Don't care much about prospect rankings and care not at all about defensive limitations when discussing the offense a prospect might possess.

    I only saw one "long-ish swing" comment and that was an amateur scouting report from BP. Of the six I saw, five praised his swing as "thunderous", "to the point," and "good bat-to-ball skills." In short, I'm unworried about his swing mechanics. If there's a worry about his offensive game, it's that he'll chase pitches out of the zone. That said, he has enough power to still be of use. He's also already shown a penchant for tinkering postively with his swing. That shows me something, as does his willingness to learn from coaching.

    I suspect CES is and will continue to be seriously underrated by national pundits.
    I didn’t read BP, saw the long swing comment elsewhere. But the main concern would be a 4% walk rate at AA with a fairly high K rate. That’s a red flag, a lack of patience, MLB pitchers will take advantage of that. Whether he’s being seriously underrated - or the subject of legitimate concern- we’ll find out soon enough.

  11. #39
    Member Redhook's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,556

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    I’ll take CES 10 times out of 10 over McLain. McLain has a chance to be a decent MLB player. CES’ defense might be suspect, but that dude will hit like a poor man’s Edgar Martinez. I’d be very surprised if his OPS is under .825.
    "....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

  12. #40
    Probably not Patrick Bateman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    8,837

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    I think a lot of the guys being described as B tier are more C.

    I think C is like that fangraphs 40/45 range. Reds have tons of them. Some will hit and really well. Just don’t know who. Cast a wide net.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


    "I'm not mad, I just type aggressively"
    -Rdirtypirates (Sep 6, 2023)

  13. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,231

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    A prospects - Marte, EDLC
    A- prospects - Collier, Steer, CES
    B+ prospects - Arroyo, McClain, Williamson
    B prospects - Stoudt, Petty, Stewart
    (Hard for me to grade. Prospects with serious athleticism, and some interesting numbers, but also serious flaws) - Boyle, Phillips, Hinds, Hendrick

  14. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,506

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    So, I’ve already said that McClain should be in the second group. Still feel that way, recognizing good points made in the discussion by all involved.

    I also believe that Collier should be in the top group. I know he’s far from the majors. But his youth is a benefit, not a detriment. This guy could be in the majors at age 20. His numbers at complex ball, small sample, were tremendous.

  15. #43
    Member Bourgeois Zee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    12,814

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    So, I’ve already said that McClain should be in the second group. Still feel that way, recognizing good points made in the discussion by all involved.

    I also believe that Collier should be in the top group. I know he’s far from the majors. But his youth is a benefit, not a detriment. This guy could be in the majors at age 20. His numbers at complex ball, small sample, were tremendous.
    Interesting.

    I guess I have a bias against players in Complex Ball-- the numbers often mean nothing due to small samples and the guys who are pitching against them. For example, based on numbers and age, Carlos Jorge should be in the discussion as an A prospect. His professional career line is special-- .309/ .422/ .558/ .980. Add in the 50+ SB in less than 90 games. Add in an insane BB rate (14.5%). Oh, he'll be 19 nearly all of next season in low A Daytona (and perhaps higher). He plays in the middle of the field (2B) and moved from SS, indicating he has a good arm. Second in the ACL in slugging percentage, 10 HR in less than 250 ABs, a K rate below 25%-- all of these assay a top-flight prospect.

    But it's only 300 or so PAs. And tons of guys have struggled after being a monster at that level.

    I think Collier's a very, very good prospect, but he's almost too far away to judge on this scale (at least for me). The same goes for Jorge, Sal Stewart, Johnny Ascanio, Leonardo Balcazar, Donovan Antonia, Ariel Almonte, Hector Rodriguez, and (to a lesser extent) 2021's ACL MVP Yerlin Confidan.

    The relative good news is that Collier is set up to move fairly quickly. If he hits in Daytona like he did in Arizona, he could be moved quickly to Dayton. There's no one there to stand in the way. I think you're right, KC, in believing that it's possible Collier makes the majors by age 20. That's typically the mark of a perennial All-Star and often a Hall of Famer.

    Suffice the say, the Reds have some intriguing talent moving through the pipeline in Daytona, and I'll be very interested to see how it does.

  16. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Southwest Ohio
    Posts
    5,936

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    The key for the Reds is deciding which prospects to keep at their natural positions, which prospects to move to other positions that they will succeed, and which prospects to trade for pitching.
    “I think I throw the ball as hard as anyone. The ball just doesn't get there as fast.” — Eddie Bane

    “We know we're better than this ... but we can't prove it.” — Tony Gwynn

  17. #45
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,231

    Re: Grading the Farm (End of 2022 Edition)

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeS21 View Post
    The key for the Reds is deciding which prospects to keep at their natural positions, which prospects to move to other positions that they will succeed, and which prospects to trade for pitching.
    The key for the Reds is bringing in talent that they can teach and develop Major League skills, winning mentality and physical strength and durability. They need to bring in more hitters who make solid, consistent contact because they don’t seem to be able to teach it.
    They need to bring in more pitchers who have good command and can throw strickes to begin with, beucase they don’t seem to be able to teach those things.

  18. Likes:

    Revering4Blue (10-09-2022)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator