Originally Posted by
Bourgeois Zee
Until Ivan Johnson, I could kind of see why RedsZone chose who they did in the spot they did. Some were a little too high. Some were a little too low, but overall, I'm within a few picks or scouting reports one way or another.
Johnson barely cracks my personal Top 50. I have two would-be AAA middle infielder backups ahead of him on my list, and he doesn't even make my top 50.
That K rate, the substandard glove at SS, the lack of versatility, the relatively poor BA, the lack of health/ development, the lack of BBs-- beyond age and level, there's little to differentiate Johnson from Brian Rey (who is at least capable of playing OF) or Francisco Urbaez (who had a far better season even if it was interrupted by injury).
There is, IMO, a clear tier of prospect that still has some intriguing names to consider. Ascanio, Hector Rodriguez, Logan Tanner, Cade Hunter, Daniel Vellojin, Justin Boyd, Steve Hajjar, Carlos Sanchez-- all would be considered interesting in shallower pools. All have shown real tools, production, or both. Even among flawed prospects, Allan Cerda, Mat Nelson, Carson Spiers, and Jose Torres show carrying tools more advanced and/or more important than those of Johnson.
And that doesn't even include relief arm lottery tickets (Andrew Moore, Vin Tampanelli, Stevie Branche) who might move quickly and become helpful at the major league level as early as this season.
As is, Johnson profiles to be a backup to the backup at SS, 2B, and 3B.
Can someone explain their thought process here?