Get MLBtraderumors Reds updates on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reds-R...33794710005587
http://i.imgur.com/1bCKpaH.jpg
HokieRed (01-19-2023)
JCM11 (01-19-2023)
I believe their thinking is two-fold on the K issue:
1. All it takes is one guy who suddenly fixes his K issues, and the draft/ acquisition strategy looks genius. And despite grousing to the contrary, swing changes, experience, and development do allow prospects to fix their K issues often enough that this isn't a prayer.
2. High K rates are not the death knell to player development that they were even 15 years ago. A 30% K rate can still mean a productive player-- especially if he's really solid at the softer skills in the game.
I'm not a high K, big power guy-- I much prefer big-time hit tool, big patience guys. But that was their thinking, I suspect, during the Dick Williams era.
I think the high K rates are rampant all over baseball, not just in Cincinnati. Fact is, if players want to become the $100 Millionaire level guys, they need to be ace pitchers with a lot of K's or hit home runs, so players sell out for power. This is true of both pitchers, who go all out for shorter outings now and put so much torque on their arms snapping off breaking balls that injuries are through the roof; and hitters who create so much wind swinging and missing that they should put a wind farm right next to the ballpark. It would solve most of America's energy problems.
The result of both of those things is K's going through the roof.
All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!
HokieRed (01-19-2023)
The other aspect of the high-K guys being discussed in this thread is most of them are legit athletes with strong arms, can run, play defense, etc. That helps insulate their floor and reduces the boom/bust nature a little.
Maybe. For one game, a guy with a 3 ERA who can give you five innings is probably a great pitcher to have going. Over a season, I'd rather have the guy who can provide 225 Innings at 4 ERA than a guy who gives 150 innings at 3 ERA. The emphasis on K's have eliminated that second guy.
I agree more with what you say about the hitter's side of the argument, but guys like Aristedes Aquino are not more valuable than guys like TJ Friedl.
Still, I think teh monetary reasons are why the players do it. Their concern is maximizing their salary.
All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!
Betterread (01-19-2023)
Betterread (01-19-2023)
In key September games or playoffs, you need impact pitching. At that point, innings coverage becomes secondary. A 3.00 pitcher for five innings is valuable in that setting, backed by a good bullpen.
Different for the regular season generally, when innings coverage can save a staff. Getting through 162 games is a different consideration.
Old school 1983 (01-19-2023)
This oversimplification is meaningless. There are so many factors that go into developing young hitters to make contact and to minimize swing and misses. Pre-pitch setup, swing path, swing mechanics, how hands and wrists are inoporated into the swing (like golf there are many things to improve an maintain). And then there is predicting the path of the thrown ball. Many skills go into that ability or failure.
Each young player has a unique set of these abilities. I wish it was clearer to see what abilities the Reds are having success teaching.
Nope.
Again, the philosophy the Reds seem to have worked under is that a high K prospect who has other loud tools could be a productive major league player. In today's game, that makes sense. The secondary aspect of this development theory is that they might end up with an All-Star/ difference-maker (where one wasn't obviously available) if a high K prospect learns better pitch recognition.
They've done this with Hinds, Cerda, EDLC, Hendrick, Mat Nelson, Jose Torres, and others offensively. They've done largely the same thing with pitching, with Joe Boyle, Luis Mey, and a whole host of relief prospects-- that propensity has already been successful in developing Alexis Diaz, Graham Ashcraft, and a couple others.
I agree that the Reds target high risk big power prospects but they have always done that. The difference is that Dunn, Bruce, Mesoraco all developed pitch recognition and patience in the minors, while the reds have not had a power hitter succeed for a while. With the current group, I don’t see where the reds are making progress (except for EDLC).
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |