Turn Off Ads?
Page 31 of 58 FirstFirst ... 2127282930313233343541 ... LastLast
Results 451 to 465 of 867

Thread: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

  1. #451
    Member Redhook's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,583

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Operator View Post
    He’d be heading for Canton if he had been a Pittsburgh Steeler.

    The stuff he did was not at all out of line with the stuff they let gold & black defenders get away with to this very day, but put him in a Bengal uniform and he’s dirty, a thug, has no place in the game, etc.
    100%
    "....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

  2. Likes:

    The Operator (11-08-2024)


  3. Turn Off Ads?
  4. #452
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    503

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    The state of the francise is that they let the Washington Football Club win the Marshon Lattimore sweepstakes. Bengals didn't even fill out the form to compete in the race.
    Did you want the Bengals to give up a 3rd round pick for Lattimore? I was hoping they'd get some reinforcements with a 5/6 round pick. But I don't think this team is good enough to invest real draft capital. He's not even healthy enough to get on the field yet. It's a much better bet for 7-2 Washington.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #453
    Kmac5 KoryMac5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, NY
    Posts
    4,059

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    They asked Taylor about Burrow and the lack of roughing calls. States he needs to be better about getting on the official as Joe doesn’t like to do it as he feels it gets him out of his game flow.


    They need to start sending tape to the league office cause he was pummeled by Humphries.
    If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

  6. #454
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,537

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Anyone see Goodberry's brutal film review of Volson getting absolutely bullied?

    Frank Pollack needs to be fired because there hasn't been much growth. It's not 100% his fault with the OL but it's still a lot. Amazingly, he's still better than the Jim Turner hire. Zac Taylor's OL hires have been terrifically awful.

  7. Likes:

    Kingspoint (11-09-2024),Redsfaithful (11-10-2024)

  8. #455
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    19,189

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Interesting read on that last 2 point try.

    https://www.si.com/nfl/bengals/why-t...PxrUl6bnp0F4mA
    The rose goes in the front, big guy.

  9. #456
    Member Old school 1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,420

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Bengals need to realize that maybe trading some picks for established talent might pay more dividends that mid to late in the round draft picks.

  10. Likes:

    Kingspoint (11-09-2024),Redsfaithful (11-10-2024)

  11. #457
    Potential Lunch Winner Dom Heffner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,492

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by Old school 1983 View Post
    Bengals need to realize that maybe trading some picks for established talent might pay more dividends that mid to late in the round draft picks.
    if you cant draft- and really the drew sample pick tells you what you need to see- they should use some of it for known quantities.

    they wont because mike brown is too cheap.

    - - - Updated - - -

    i ran smack into zac taylor at jump zone in oakley, and held my tongue.

  12. Likes:

    Kingspoint (11-09-2024),Redsfaithful (11-10-2024)

  13. #458
    Eight bosses? Bob Sheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Eight, Bob.
    Posts
    3,588

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by WVRed View Post

    Had the Bengals tied the game, Lamar had 35 seconds, two timeouts and a HOF kicker who has hit game winners against the Bengals in prime time. Completely understand the decision.

    That said it looks like they got hosed out of it.

    Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk
    Whether they are tied, or up by one, a FG still wins it, and Lamar still has 35 seconds, two timeouts and a HOF kicker who has hit game winners against the Bengals in prime time.

    I'm all for aggressive playcalling, but this was a stupid decision with very little upside and a ton of downside.
    "When financial success is attainable without on-field success, why rock the boat?"

  14. Likes:

    Old school 1983 (11-11-2024)

  15. #459
    Member Ky Fried Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Home of the original 11 herbs & spices
    Posts
    4,716

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Sheed View Post
    Whether they are tied, or up by one, a FG still wins it, and Lamar still has 35 seconds, two timeouts and a HOF kicker who has hit game winners against the Bengals in prime time.

    I'm all for aggressive playcalling, but this was a stupid decision with very little upside and a ton of downside.
    I might have considered it if it was essentially the last play of the game. But with the time that was remaining and the likelihood of the Ravens getting into FG range anyway, I think probably just kicking the PAT was the prudent thing to do. Certainly was an interesting situation.
    "I’m here and I’m taking copious notes. Cuts will be made tonight. " --- The Big Lebowski

  16. Likes:

    Bob Sheed (11-10-2024),Old school 1983 (11-11-2024)

  17. #460
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    15,295

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hillsdale87 View Post
    Did you want the Bengals to give up a 3rd round pick for Lattimore? I was hoping they'd get some reinforcements with a 5/6 round pick. But I don't think this team is good enough to invest real draft capital. He's not even healthy enough to get on the field yet. It's a much better bet for 7-2 Washington.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I wanted them to give up a 2nd Round pick for Lattimore. BAL offered a 3rd. The Chiefs offered as much, and then Washington swept in and topped the 3rd.

    It's just like the REDS with the Greene/De La Cruz window. They need to get quality players around their Super Stars and try to win now. A 2nd Round pick is a crapshoot that may pay off, if it does at all, in 4 or 5 years from now. Lattimore is at his best right now and for the next 4 or 5 years. Competing against the QB-rich AFC, the Bengals have to get quality CB's that are already proven to be good when the opportunity like this arises. It was a complete failure by the franchise to not step up and do so. Burrow can throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's and it's not good enough because there's just as good of a QB on the opposite side of the ball.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  18. Likes:

    Redsfaithful (11-10-2024)

  19. #461
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    503

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    I wanted them to give up a 2nd Round pick for Lattimore. BAL offered a 3rd. The Chiefs offered as much, and then Washington swept in and topped the 3rd.

    It's just like the REDS with the Greene/De La Cruz window. They need to get quality players around their Super Stars and try to win now. A 2nd Round pick is a crapshoot that may pay off, if it does at all, in 4 or 5 years from now. Lattimore is at his best right now and for the next 4 or 5 years. Competing against the QB-rich AFC, the Bengals have to get quality CB's that are already proven to be good when the opportunity like this arises. It was a complete failure by the franchise to not step up and do so. Burrow can throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's and it's not good enough because there's just as good of a QB on the opposite side of the ball.
    I agree about maximizing the window, but I just don't want to overpay for this season at this point. If they don't make some big changes in the offseason, that will be a big problem.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  20. #462
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    15,295

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hillsdale87 View Post
    I agree about maximizing the window, but I just don't want to overpay for this season at this point. If they don't make some big changes in the offseason, that will be a big problem.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I was thinking as much as the next two seasons as Lattimore is under contract for two years and then the Bengals could still use the tag on him.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  21. #463
    Member Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    9,226

    Re: 2024 Cincinnati Bengals Part 3: Stay the Course?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Sheed View Post
    Whether they are tied, or up by one, a FG still wins it, and Lamar still has 35 seconds, two timeouts and a HOF kicker who has hit game winners against the Bengals in prime time.

    I'm all for aggressive playcalling, but this was a stupid decision with very little upside and a ton of downside.
    What's wild is that as a fan I'm really a Joe Goodberry acolyte with this team, I believe in being ultra aggressive on offense, letting Joe Burrow win the game, go for it on 4th down, go for 2, etc etc. but they fail at those calls so damn much (and for a variety of reasons, sometimes it feels like the playcall, sometimes execution, sometimes the refs screw them) that now I'm almost second guessing.

    I'm not there yet all the way, because damn if I don't want the ball in Burrow's hands anytime the game is on the line, but their luck this year has just been astoundingly bad, even for a Bengals team.
    Turning and turning in the widening gyre
    The falcon cannot hear the falconer;

  22. Likes:

    Bob Sheed (11-10-2024),Kingspoint (11-10-2024)

  23. #464
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    503

    Bengals

    Quote Originally Posted by redsfandan View Post
    It's not doom and gloom. It's just the same old Bengals. You admitted you don't have that much confidence in the front office. The Bengals are good at fielding teams that are good enough to make people think they might be playoff contenders without doing enough to consistently be serious playoff contenders.
    The doom and gloom I'm referencing is the Bengals fans who are saying that this is just like Carson Palmer and Joe is going to demand a trade out. I don't think that's going to happen, or at least there's no reason to think it's going to happen now. The Bengals are investing around Burrow, but the problem is that they made really good investments in 2021, and most of the investments since have been busts. Bengals are 3rd in spending against the cap on defense, which seems amazing considering how bad they are.

    I think this situation is much different than with Carson. I also think that they're pretty close. They'll be able to make a lot of cuts in the offseason and hopefully shore up some positions and be right back in it next year.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  24. #465
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,137

    Re: NFL 2024 Thread: Can Anyone Stop the Chiefs?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hillsdale87 View Post
    The doom and gloom I'm referencing is the Bengals fans who are saying that this is just like Carson Palmer and Joe is going to demand a trade out. I don't think that's going to happen, or at least there's no reason to think it's going to happen now. The Bengals are investing around Burrow, but the problem is that they made really good investments in 2021, and most of the investments since have been busts. Bengals are 3rd in spending against the cap on defense, which seems amazing considering how bad they are.

    I think this situation is much different than with Carson. I also think that they're pretty close. They'll be able to make a lot of cuts in the offseason and hopefully shore up some positions and be right back in it next year.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    That's a pretty irrelevant statistic. Most teams are consistently restructuring contracts and converting base salaries to guaranteed bonuses, so they can spread the current year cap hit over the remaining contract term and free up additional cap space that can be leveraged to sign free agents, resign players to LTC, etc. So ultimately, when you take a snapshot view of cap spend by team, you're not necessarily comparing apples to apples. I say all this, because the Bengals aren't most teams. Most fans like to say the Bengals don't operate this way because they're too cash poor. I actually don't think it's that though. My belief is they hate any potential Dead Cap hits. I know it's not the same, but it's like they view Dead Cap hits in the same lens most people view interest expense; a non-value add expenditure. If you go back the past ten seasons, here is where the Bengals rank in terms of Least Dead Cap Space:

    2014: 1
    2015: 1
    2016: 2
    2017: 1
    2018: 3
    2019: 8
    2020: 14
    2021: 9
    2022: 3
    2023: 1
    2024: 1

    I know this is not the Bengals thread, but if the Bengals want to be actual players in the NFL, they need to start manipulating the cap and increasing the guarantees.

  25. Likes:

    Boss-Hog (11-11-2024),Hillsdale87 (11-11-2024),RiverRat13 (11-11-2024)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator