Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit them?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    st louis
    Posts
    297

    Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit them?

    Recent thread fix Benson: reds hiring three new hitting coaches bring back Votto comments.

    the savvy members of the board, I'm sure can name 20 former Reds, past and current who had raw power, if and when they hit a fast ball.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    15,295

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    Those that can learn to recognize pitches and hit them have long careers in the Majors. Those that don't, do not.

    So, yeah, there's evidence that 10,000 players have been very good at learning it. It's something that has to be constantly relearned every year.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  4. #3
    .377 in 1905 CySeymour's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    4,737

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    Those that can learn to recognize pitches and hit them have long careers in the Majors. Those that don't, do not.

    So, yeah, there's evidence that 10,000 players have been very good at learning it. It's something that has to be constantly relearned every year.
    Really, if you think about it, it's much less than that. There's been like 25k players in MLB history, probably more than half who are pitchers. So of those remaining hitters, a fraction have been good MLB hitters who are good at pitch recognition.

    I've always suspected that for the most part it really is something you are born with. Much like a mathematician being able to just see patterns in numbers, partly from education and also because their brain is wired to recognize them.
    ...the 2-2 to Woodsen and here it comes...and it is swung on and missed! And Tom Browning has pitched a perfect game! Twenty-seven outs in a row, and he is being mobbed by his teammates, just to the thirdbase side of the mound.

  5. #4
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    15,295

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    Quote Originally Posted by CySeymour View Post
    Really, if you think about it, it's much less than that. There's been like 25k players in MLB history, probably more than half who are pitchers. So of those remaining hitters, a fraction have been good MLB hitters who are good at pitch recognition.

    I've always suspected that for the most part it really is something you are born with. Much like a mathematician being able to just see patterns in numbers, partly from education and also because their brain is wired to recognize them.
    For 75 years Major League Baseball had about half of the quality hitters that existed in all of baseball. Many would also have their careers end early because of injuries.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    st louis
    Posts
    297

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    Joey Votto was successful (IMO) because he spent the due-diligence to acquire plate recognition re balls/strikes and make the adjustments to improve his odds of accompliing his desired result.
    He had fewer wasted ABS. I would wager most of the quality hitters had similar dedication.

    Players know, watch after the fact, when they swing at out of the zone pitches, while I wonder why many don't show improvement, is it similar to not being able to recognize in a mini-second or just not doing the due-diligence to improve their odds of being successful in their dual with the pitcher.

  7. #6
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    15,295

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    It's like any other job. It's a skill that's developed with work and practice, and that varies with the individual. Some people are better fits mentally and emotionally and physically for different jobs than others.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  8. #7
    Member boxseat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    119

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    I would think that a professional player would know what a fastball looks like. If not, they probably shouldn't be in the league.

  9. #8
    .377 in 1905 CySeymour's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    4,737

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    Quote Originally Posted by boxseat View Post
    I would think that a professional player would know to what a fastball looks like.
    But can they quickly enough recognize a 2 seamer from a 4 seamer? What about a straight change out of the pitchers hand?
    ...the 2-2 to Woodsen and here it comes...and it is swung on and missed! And Tom Browning has pitched a perfect game! Twenty-seven outs in a row, and he is being mobbed by his teammates, just to the thirdbase side of the mound.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Papist
    Posts
    5,533

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    Everything looks like a fastball....until it doesn't.

  11. Likes:

    RED VAN HOT (11-21-2024)

  12. #10
    Member boxseat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    119

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Red View Post
    Everything looks like a fastball....until it doesn't.
    You're getting at what I'm saying. They can recognize speed, but not the pitch type.

  13. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Kokomo, IN
    Posts
    66

    Re: Is there evidence that a player can learn to recognize pitches 1. and 2. hit th

    I've always wondered how much a players eyesight played into pitch recognition. I've always heard that really good hitters had exceptional eyesight.
    Later,
    Tom

    "Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're
    fascist. Throw some ground balls, it's more democratic." - Crash Davis

  14. Likes:

    mth123 (11-21-2024)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator