I would say that you pick and choose which facts you choose to inform you on the subject. It's not the tangible evidence that is brought into the realm of scientific theory, its the interpretation of the tangible evidence that is disputable and is THEORY. We're talking origins, you're talking about things that are known to exist today. How they got here is the subject, not that they're here, so I'm not sure how this deserves applause:Originally Posted by M2
So what? Who ever said that they needed to be covered in Genesis to give Creationism (based on Biblical and scientific evidence) any validity? You don't find America specifically mentioned anywhere in the Bible, so does that mean the grammitico-historical approach to Biblical interpretation is not valid and one has to adopt the liberal view of the Scriptures that you promote? BTW, the solar system is covered in Genesis."There's civilizations, continents, oceans and galaxies not accounted for in the Bible. How do I know North America exists? How do I know Kangaroos' exist? How do I know the solar system exists? It's not due to theory and it's sure as shooting not from Genesis."