WT took an interesting route to that one.
WT took an interesting route to that one.
Harang hasn't looked great but he's been effective up till now.
Hope it continues.
Oh, I'm not saying I like it either. But if you are going to bunt early in the game with a runner on second and zero outs, that would be the situation I would consider it.
My being able to stomach it would be based on the hitter attempting to bunt for a base hit, as opposed to simply sacrificing.
Ludwick two run HR...tie game
Duncan flies out to left
Harang with 54 pitches.
FWIW, I just googled a run expectancy map by Tangotiger based on data from 1999 to 2002:
Runner on 2nd none out: 1.189 runs
Runner on 3rd 1 out: 0.983 runs
There's a lot of circumstances to think about (ie. hairston being at bat instead of someone else), but based on that, even getting the bunt down successfully makes it a poor play, and there's a decent enough chance he doesn't even get it down. Looks like you were right.
Last edited by Patrick Bateman; 05-09-2009 at 08:07 PM.
The Ohio River looks blue. What's up with that? It's a high-def set.
How does Harang look? Does Phillips look like he has recovered from the flu?
Despite the walk, a well-timed 10 pitch inning for Harang.
Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand
Does that count as a sack for the linebacker Nix? Loshe looked like he was bouncing off a brick wall there. :O)
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |