Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 48

Thread: John Fay is clueless

  1. #16
    Member medford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    2,385

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Quote Originally Posted by Blitz Dorsey View Post
    Patrick, once per year we usually agree my friend. I have a feeling it might happen twice in 2012 though. It's that kind of year.
    That's what happens when the world is about to end

  2. #17
    Member hebroncougar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,352

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Quote Originally Posted by Vottomatic View Post
    I can't say about the future, but for this year only, it seems that the 1 year deal thing is the way to go. For the first time in a long while, most of the MLB clubs are watching their payrolls and budgets.

    I think the 1 year deal for Madsen was a smart move. I've heard no mention of a club option for a second year though. Kinda wish there was. Or maybe they're leaving the door open for a Marshall extension and making him the closer?
    I think this is true. If anything, the Madsen deal may push down the price for a Marshall extension. Truth be told, if you're a reliever, and you're not a lights out closer, if a team offers you a multi year deal, probably a good idea to take it. Madsen will be looking for major money next offseason. I don't think there is darn near anyway the Reds get an extension on him during the season.

  3. #18
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    20,179

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    John Fay is clueless
    In other news, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
    Well, when you're sitting back in your rose pink Cadillac
    Making bets on Kentucky Derby Day

  4. #19
    Member mdccclxix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Crown
    Posts
    4,139

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Fay is pretty even keeled, which in twitter/blog world has some value. The only thing that irks me is his persistence on the limitations that the Reds have financially or otherwise. But that too acts as a buffer to some really ridiculous questions and comments that are out there. I also find his spelling misfortune hilarious and endearingly reliable.
    2015 Rotation: Under Construction

  5. #20
    Member Strikes Out Looking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    5,173

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    I don't think it so much that Fay is clueless but that his sources are basically within the Reds organization and they treat him like a mushroom (keep him in the dark and shovel him you know what). To be really effective and top tier he needs to develop sources outside of the tri-state area.
    Openers are for losers

  6. #21
    Member mdccclxix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Crown
    Posts
    4,139

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Quote Originally Posted by Strikes Out Looking View Post
    I don't think it so much that Fay is clueless but that his sources are basically within the Reds organization and they treat him like a mushroom (keep him in the dark and shovel him you know what). To be really effective and top tier he needs to develop sources outside of the tri-state area.
    That's funny!

    I think you often see the guys closest to the team know less because they need to be a non-threat to information. He can be controlled, so he is. Not a knock on him, though. Perhaps some of the guys in Chicago or NY seem to be in tighter, I don't know.
    2015 Rotation: Under Construction

  7. #22
    Member kbrake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,908

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    I don't mind Fay. This place can be hard on all Reds beat writers at times.

  8. #23
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy Tucker View Post
    In other news, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
    .....and in other news, scientists have determined through a $100 million dollar grant, that water is wet.

    Woo-hoo!!!!

  9. #24
    Member RollyInRaleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Posts
    15,429

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Quote Originally Posted by kbrake View Post
    I don't mind Fay. This place can be hard on all Reds beat writers at times.
    This place can be tough on everyone and everything.

  10. #25
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Quote Originally Posted by kbrake View Post
    I don't mind Fay. This place can be hard on all Reds beat writers at times.
    I agree. Fay is a good writer.
    He sticks his neck out at times and is wrong, but I can sympathize with him.
    I'd rather he give out everything he gets over the winter and be wrong sometimes than just sit on all info (because none of it can be verified).

    Thankfully, it really doesn't matter what they offered Coco now
    But what Fay says is not implausible.
    Coco was coming off a 12 million dollar salary. Looks like the Reds had about 8 million to spend on a closer. They pretty much had to sign one (IMO).
    I could see a situation where both Coco and Madson had similiar offers on the table.. Or perhaps Madson was offered 8.5, given a "soft deadline" and was told that money would be offered to Coco after the deadline if Madson didn't.

    I don't doubt that the Reds were using Coco as leverage to pressure Madson into signing. There was a quote from Walt a couple days ago (about Coco) saying he wanted to get it all resolved this week. Now we know what he was talking about
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  11. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,737

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    I believe you are correct that he was at first. But considering that a better closer who is a Boras client didn't hold out for a multiple year deal, I can't imagine that Cordero was still holding out for one at this point. If he was, he needs to fire his agent.
    There's a difference though for Madsen and Cordero. The 1 year deal for Madsen actually benefits him. He gets to go have a big year(hopefully) and then sign a 3 or 4 year contract. This will be the possibly be the last contract Cordero signs. So a 2 year $5 million/year contract would actually be better than a 1 year $6 Million contract.
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckeyeRed27 View Post
    Honest I can't say it any better than Hoosier Red did in his post, he sums it up basically perfectly.

  12. #27
    Party like it's 1990 Blitz Dorsey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,716

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    I agree. Fay is a good writer.
    He sticks his neck out at times and is wrong, but I can sympathize with him.
    I'd rather he give out everything he gets over the winter and be wrong sometimes than just sit on all info (because none of it can be verified).

    Thankfully, it really doesn't matter what they offered Coco now
    But what Fay says is not implausible.
    Coco was coming off a 12 million dollar salary. Looks like the Reds had about 8 million to spend on a closer. They pretty much had to sign one (IMO).
    I could see a situation where both Coco and Madson had similiar offers on the table.. Or perhaps Madson was offered 8.5, given a "soft deadline" and was told that money would be offered to Coco after the deadline if Madson didn't.

    I don't doubt that the Reds were using Coco as leverage to pressure Madson into signing. There was a quote from Walt a couple days ago (about Coco) saying he wanted to get it all resolved this week. Now we know what he was talking about
    I disagree. I don't think there is any conceivable way that Madson and Coco had "similar offers on the table." I guess I just don't want to believe that Walt could be dumb enough to offer Cordero anywhere near what he offered Madson. Nearly everyone in baseball would agree that one of them is much better than the other.

    I think the Reds are classy and don't want to trash Coco publicly. But truth is IMO, they gave him a "low-ball" offer which didn't approach what they offered Madson. I bet Madson's offer was nearly double what they offered Coco. Yet, there is Fay still insisting that Cordero was offered $7 or $8 million from the Reds. No way.

  13. #28
    Member Homer Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,700

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    This is Fay's breakdown of the trade:

    RT @ajr0031 do you think this is an upgrade at the closer spot?//4 fewer blown saves. Thats big. Cordero's WHIP was slightly better.
    Sigh.

  14. #29
    Member OesterPoster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    West-central Ohio
    Posts
    2,422

    Re: John Fay is clueless

    Yeah, I saw that one too Homer. I tried to reply, but I couldn't figure out how to tell Fay that his analysis was bunk in less than 140 characters.

  15. #30
    High five!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976
    I think Chip's nickname for Fay is apt.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator