Turn Off Ads?
Page 25 of 67 FirstFirst ... 1521222324252627282935 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 375 of 1003

Thread: Royals interested in Bruce?

  1. #361
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    59,914

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    I wish I had a nickel for every time I read this after a Bruce hot streak.
    I wish I had one for every time I read he sucked air and is a waste.

    We could pool our money and get a sixer

  2. Likes:

    Edd Roush (06-08-2016),PuffyPig (06-09-2016),Revering4Blue (06-08-2016)

  3. #362
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    19,800

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I don't think Bruce is on a hot streak. His play this year is very consistent. It's not feeling like his other streaks felt; he's more of a cog than putting the team on his back. I suspect we're on the verge of seeing a monster 2-3 week stretch out of him where we'll say "there's that hot streak we knew he had in him."
    Empathy is about standing in someone else's shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes. Not only is empathy hard to outsource and automate, but it makes the world a better place.

    -- Daniel H. Pink

  4. #363
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    19,800

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I put this in another thread but it really wasn't an appropriate place for the discussion...

    I still think it would behoove any fan to take up a competitive endeavor. It doesn't have to be a sport, but definitely something that takes time and practice to become a proficient amateur, at least. Mine is bowling. Lots of people choose golf. Anyway, it really does give you some insight into how a small injury can affect your performance, how your body changes over time, how you have to maintain a mental focus, all of that. Then realize that at the top professional level, all of that is magnified about 100x against people who are all the time looking for ways to get the best of you, never mind the pressure of playing in front of millions of people for millions of dollars. That type of performance doesn't come from rolling out of bed. And an injury to the knee, in a sport that requires balance and agility, yes, that is going to alter your mechanics in ways you can't even imagine. To suggest that someone wouldn't be affected by such things is absurd, especially at the very top professional level.
    Empathy is about standing in someone else's shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes. Not only is empathy hard to outsource and automate, but it makes the world a better place.

    -- Daniel H. Pink

  5. Likes:

    CesarGeronimo (06-08-2016),Griffey012 (06-09-2016),Redeyecat (06-11-2016),RedlegJake (06-09-2016)

  6. #364
    Member Ron Madden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    22,401

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Here's another opinion on Jay Bruce.

    https://calltothepen.com/2016/06/08/...bouncing-back/

  7. #365
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    23,461

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Just for grins here is Bruce's game log for this year. Mostly because I like posting tables.

    DATE OPP RESULT AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO OBP SLG OPS AVG
    4/4/2016 vs PHI W 6-2 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250
    4/6/2016 vs PHI W 3-2 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.375 0.375 0.750 0.375
    4/7/2016 vs PHI W 10-6 4 2 3 0 0 2 5 0 0 0.500 1.000 1.500 0.500
    4/8/2016 vs PIT L 6-5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.438 0.800 1.238 0.400
    4/9/2016 vs PIT W 5-1 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0.400 0.684 1.084 0.368
    4/10/2016 vs PIT W 2-1 4 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.417 0.739 1.156 0.391
    4/11/2016 @ CHC L 5-3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.357 0.630 0.987 0.333
    4/13/2016 @ CHC L 9-2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.313 0.567 0.880 0.300
    4/14/2016 @ CHC L 8-1 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.361 0.606 0.967 0.333
    4/15/2016 @ STL L 14-3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.325 0.541 0.866 0.297
    4/16/2016 @ STL W 9-8 5 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0.333 0.595 0.928 0.310
    4/17/2016 @ STL L 4-3 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.327 0.565 0.892 0.304
    4/18/2016 vs COL L 5-1 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0.321 0.560 0.881 0.300
    4/19/2016 vs COL W 4-3 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.298 0.519 0.817 0.278
    4/20/2016 vs COL W 6-5 4 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0.311 0.569 0.880 0.293
    4/21/2016 vs CHC L 16-0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.313 0.550 0.863 0.283
    4/22/2016 vs CHC L 8-1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.313 0.540 0.853 0.286
    4/23/2016 vs CHC W 13-5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0.324 0.523 0.847 0.277
    4/24/2016 vs CHC L 9-0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.320 0.500 0.820 0.265
    4/29/2016 @ PIT L 4-1 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.316 0.500 0.816 0.264
    4/30/2016 @ PIT L 5-1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.313 0.480 0.793 0.253
    Monthly Totals 75 9 19 3 1 4 15 5 17 0.313 0.480 0.793 0.253
    5/1/2016 @ PIT W 6-5 3 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 0.322 0.487 0.809 0.256
    5/2/2016 vs SF L 9-6 4 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.319 0.500 0.819 0.256
    5/3/2016 vs SF L 3-1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.305 0.477 0.782 0.244
    5/4/2016 vs SF W 7-4 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0.303 0.478 0.781 0.244
    5/5/2016 vs MIL W 9-5 4 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 2 0.301 0.500 0.801 0.245
    5/6/2016 vs MIL W 5-1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.299 0.490 0.789 0.245
    5/7/2016 vs MIL L 13-7 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0.295 0.485 0.780 0.243
    5/8/2016 vs MIL L 5-4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.284 0.467 0.751 0.234
    5/9/2016 vs PIT W 3-2 Did not play
    5/11/2016 vs PIT L 5-4 4 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0.292 0.495 0.787 0.243
    5/13/2016 @ PHI L 3-2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.285 0.482 0.767 0.237
    5/14/2016 @ PHI L 4-3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.291 0.479 0.770 0.239
    5/15/2016 @ PHI W 9-4 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 0.318 0.500 0.818 0.258
    5/16/2016 @ CLE L 15-6 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0.324 0.500 0.824 0.266
    5/17/2016 @ CLE L 13-1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.331 0.504 0.835 0.276
    5/18/2016 vs CLE L 8-7 4 3 3 0 0 2 2 1 0 0.347 0.557 0.904 0.290
    5/19/2016 vs CLE L 7-2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.338 0.541 0.879 0.281
    5/20/2016 vs SEA L 8-3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.329 0.525 0.854 0.273
    5/21/2016 vs SEA L 4-0 Did not play
    5/22/2016 vs SEA L 5-4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.327 0.518 0.845 0.270
    5/23/2016 @ LAD L 1-0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.321 0.507 0.828 0.264
    5/24/2016 @ LAD L 8-2 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.319 0.507 0.826 0.264
    5/25/2016 @ LAD L 3-1 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.317 0.513 0.830 0.263
    5/27/2016 @ MIL L 9-5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.310 0.500 0.810 0.256
    5/28/2016 @ MIL W 7-6 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0.313 0.497 0.810 0.261
    5/29/2016 @ MIL L 5-4 3 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.317 0.512 0.829 0.262
    5/30/2016 @ COL W 11-8 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.314 0.509 0.823 0.260
    5/31/2016 @ COL L 17-4 4 1 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 0.323 0.549 0.872 0.272
    Monthly Totals 98 19 28 7 3 6 18 7 25 0.330 0.602 0.932 0.286
    6/1/2016 @ COL W 7-2 4 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0.321 0.559 0.880 0.271
    6/2/2016 @ COL W 11-4 5 1 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 0.323 0.571 0.894 0.275
    6/3/2016 vs WSH W 7-2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.317 0.559 0.876 0.269
    6/4/2016 vs WSH W 6-3 4 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0.325 0.579 0.904 0.279
    6/5/2016 vs WSH L 10-9 3 2 1 0 0 1 3 2 1 0.332 0.591 0.923 0.280
    6/7/2016 vs STL W 7-6 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.330 0.584 0.914 0.279
    Monthly Totals 24 7 8 1 1 3 7 2 3 0.385 0.833 1.218 0.333
    AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO OBP SLG OPS AVG
    Totals 197 35 55 11 5 13 40 14 45 0.330 0.584 0.914 0.279

    Seems fairly consistent. A few cool streaks, a few warm ones too.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  8. Likes:

    Knightro28 (06-08-2016)

  9. #366
    "So Fla Red"
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    5,565

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Name:  Brucey.jpg
Views: 586
Size:  33.9 KB

  10. #367
    Knowledge Is Good Big Klu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Cambridge, OH
    Posts
    30,967

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    I wish I had one for every time I read he sucked air and is a waste.

    We could pool our money and get a sixer
    Eric Stratton, Rush Chairman. Damn glad to meet ya.

  11. Likes:

    757690 (06-08-2016),Always Red (06-08-2016),BluegrassRedleg (06-09-2016),CesarGeronimo (06-08-2016),cumberlandreds (06-09-2016),KronoRed (06-08-2016),Old school 1983 (06-09-2016),Raisor (06-08-2016),Revering4Blue (06-08-2016),Tom Servo (06-08-2016),westofyou (06-09-2016)

  12. #368
    Member Gainesville Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    2,281

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?


  13. #369
    Member Tuff Nut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    NW, Tn.
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by WrongVerb View Post
    That's a big harenaw from me.

  14. #370
    Blowing Up Cannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    631

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Ventura for Bruce? Jesus please no. Ventura is a cancer.
    "If I wanted you to understand I would have explained it better."
    - Johan Cruyff, RIP

  15. #371
    Flash the leather!
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by corkedbat View Post
    Just because you aren't spending the money doesn't mean you throw it away (Jocketty recently said there aren't many funds available for improvement). If you extend Bruce three - four years, you most likely end up with an overpaid aging OF. The last couple of years of that contract, they'll probably be looking to start negotiating early extensions with the current crop of young guns. That also could be a time where they would like to add a FA or higher-priced rental arm or bat. Be a shame to have to walk away from a contract, because you're over-paying an aging bat with diminishing skills. Move Bruce, Cozart, Phillips and yes, even Votto, the first time you get the right offer.

    I will say that if you can't get anything at all for Jay then keep him and buy him out - maybe even pick up his option in the unlikely event his offensive renaissance continues, but no more.
    I agree with the final bit. I wasn't suggesting extending him. Simply riding out the contract and letting him go via FA when the time comes. If he's still producing well (and I think he will be) then you give him a QO. At least that's how I'd handle it. But if a team blows the Reds away with an offer...that'll work too.

  16. #372
    5.3 Posts Abv Replacement BluegrassRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South of Cincinnati
    Posts
    6,285

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cannon View Post
    Ventura for Bruce? Jesus please no. Ventura is a cancer.
    He's a guy that needs to quit throwing at people intentionally. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Fantastic talent.
    Rounding third and heading for home...

  17. Likes:

    BEETTLEBUG (06-09-2016)

  18. #373
    rest in power, king Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    11,658

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by corkedbat View Post
    Just because you aren't spending the money doesn't mean you throw it away (Jocketty recently said there aren't many funds available for improvement). If you extend Bruce three - four years, you most likely end up with an overpaid aging OF. The last couple of years of that contract, they'll probably be looking to start negotiating early extensions with the current crop of young guns. That also could be a time where they would like to add a FA or higher-priced rental arm or bat. Be a shame to have to walk away from a contract, because you're over-paying an aging bat with diminishing skills. Move Bruce, Cozart, Phillips and yes, even Votto, the first time you get the right offer.

    I will say that if you can't get anything at all for Jay then keep him and buy him out - maybe even pick up his option in the unlikely event his offensive renaissance continues, but no more.


    Pass me what you're huffing, pal, sounds like some of the good stuff.

  19. #374
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    38,728

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I Still say the Reds should be talking to the Mets. With Wright, Duda and Legares all out, they have to be in the market for reinforcements (the Kelly Johnson deal is throwing a bucket of water at a raging fire IMO) . Add that even when healthy the MI there is pretty questionable defensively. Seems like a perfect spot for both Bruce and Cozart. Bruce plays 1B until Duda is back and gives them an extra bat when he is back (if Duda comes back. A stress fracture in the back may be something that keeps being aggravated with activity). Alternatively, they could put Bruce in LF with Conforto at 1B. Either way, it would solve a huge problem for the Mets. The LH pop missing with Duda out would be restored. Cozart would be a huge upgrade to the MI defense at SS and would allow Cabrera to slide over to 3B in Wright's place. IF and when Wright comes back, the depth will serve them well. He has lots of issues and will need frequent rest.

    I'd ask for Gavin Cecchini who would provide the Reds all the things in the MI that Peraza lacks. He's a SS who hits, with on Base skill and no question about sticking at SS. He's also a bit light in the power department, but has more than Peraza. This would allow Peraza to stick to 2B or possibly some OF if needed. I'd also ask for Brandon Nimmo. He's another lefty hitting OF, but unlike Waldrop and Schebler he really can play all three OF spots and seems to have some decent on base ability. He probably doesn't have as much power as either of those guys, but the overall package probably makes him a better choice as a potential RF or 4th OF. To sweeten the deal, I'd ask for a couple of arms. Robert Gsellman is a control specialist type starting pitcher who is having a fine season in AA with a 2.71 ERA and a K:BB ratio in excess of 3:1 in 66 Innings. Finally I'd ask for Marcos Molina. He's a kid with a 60 FB, a 55 Slider and 55 Control. He's recovering from TJ which makes this a buy low opportunity, but he could be a high end reliever in a couple years or a decent starter if his change-up gets better.

    That deal would give the Reds the Mets number 3, 4, 8 and 12 prospects in exchange for a allowing the Mets to fill a couple of glaring needs with player performing at an All Star caliber

    The 2017 Reds:

    Cecchini SS
    Winker RF
    Votto 1B
    Duvall LF
    Mesoraco C (Hope)
    Suarez 3B
    Phillips 2B
    Pitcher
    Hamilton CF

    The bench would include:

    Nimmo 4th OF
    Peraza Super Sub
    Barnhart C
    and a couple decent PH options that they could scrounge up. Selsky, Schebler and Waldrop would all be candidates but maybe somebody else.

    The rotation would lack a number 1, but Desclafani, Bailey, Reed, Stephenson, Strailey, Finnegan and Lamb would be my main candidates.
    Iglesias, Lorenzen and Cingrani along with two of those rotation guys would form a talented back of the bullpen along with guys like Moscot, Weiss, and other pen options.

    In AAA Garrett, Gsellman, Stephens, Davis and Romano would all be pushing for a spot. Travieso's struggles suggest a need to repeat AA at least to start out with Mahle and Mella and maybe the Molina kid.
    Last edited by mth123; 06-09-2016 at 02:07 PM.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  20. Likes:

    Redeyecat (06-11-2016),_Sir_Charles_ (06-10-2016)

  21. #375
    Member corkedbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,046

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    I wish I had one for every time I read he sucked air and is a waste.

    We could pool our money and get a sixer
    Yes, but he exhales Carbon Dioxide which aids plant growth.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator