Turn Off Ads?
Page 37 of 67 FirstFirst ... 2733343536373839404147 ... LastLast
Results 541 to 555 of 1003

Thread: Royals interested in Bruce?

  1. #541
    Member Bourgeois Zee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    17,159

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by harreljb View Post
    What about the Mets?
    Who, at this point, needs Jay Bruce (or someone like him) as a corner OF, is willing to pay him for the rest of the season, and is in the hunt for a playoff spot?

    I come up with seven teams. Boston's said they want another LH OF, so they'd be number 8.

    The list:
    Kansas City.
    San Francisco.
    Chicago (AL).
    Los Angeles (AL).
    Los Angeles (NL).
    Detroit.
    Cleveland.
    Boston.

    I'd like to see the Reds and Dodgers make a deal. Alex Verdugo would be a fine "get". Or they could gamble and grab Puig.

  2. Likes:

    REDREAD (06-15-2016)

  3. #542
    Blowing Up Cannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    631

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    Gilpdawg-- if we regressed it --where would you put him at right now ....i'm thinking maybe 1.2 WAR?
    Again I put him right around his 2012 season but a bit better offensively this year. Maybe 3-4 WAR.
    "If I wanted you to understand I would have explained it better."
    - Johan Cruyff, RIP

  4. #543
    The Future is Now Ghosts of 1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,210

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
    How did we go from Ben Greive II to better than Joey Votto?

    Your takes on Bruce have me totally befuddled and I kindly ask you to explain.
    Sure, why not take a post from what? Middle of 2009 or beginning 2010 when he went 45 games without a homer and then apply it SEVEN years later in 2016 when he's 29 and an .900 OPS bat.
    2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2015 Attendance Record: 2-0
    2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
    2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1

  5. #544
    rest in power, king Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    11,658

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghosts of 1990 View Post
    Sure, why not take a post from what? Middle of 2009 or beginning 2010 when he went 45 games without a homer and then apply it SEVEN years later in 2016 when he's 29 and an .900 OPS bat.
    Keep on digging your own grave, FKA JayBruce32.

  6. #545
    Member kaldaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,852

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghosts of 1990 View Post
    Sure, why not take a post from what? Middle of 2009 or beginning 2010 when he went 45 games without a homer and then apply it SEVEN years later in 2016 when he's 29 and an .900 OPS bat.
    Intellectual dishonesty is the worst.

    http://www.redszone.com/forums/showt...=1#post2360582

    2011.

    You told us to remember it.

    Where am I going wrong?

  7. Likes:

    Edd Roush (06-15-2016),OnBaseMachine (06-15-2016),PuffyPig (06-15-2016),Redeyecat (06-21-2016),SoTxRedsFan (06-16-2016),Tom Servo (06-15-2016),westofyou (06-15-2016),Wonderful Monds (06-15-2016)

  8. #546
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    62,259

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Next we'll hear that Duvall is better then Votto and will be going forward, until that changes.
    Go Gators!

  9. #547
    rest in power, king Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    11,658

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by KronoRed View Post
    Next we'll hear that Duvall is better then Votto and will be going forward, until that changes.
    Pros: Can't indulge in as many fancy coffees, because of the diabetes.

    Cons: Diabetes is bad.

  10. #548
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghosts of 1990 View Post
    Sure, why not take a post from what? Middle of 2009 or beginning 2010 when he went 45 games without a homer and then apply it SEVEN years later in 2016 when he's 29 and an .900 OPS bat.
    Follow up question: now that we know that Votto has a 900 ops since May 1st do you still think he's "cooked" as a player?

  11. #549
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by WrongVerb View Post
    The only disappointment about Bruce is that he had a bad injury headed into the prime of his career that sucked the production from his game for a significant period of time. It's not like one day he decided to be bad or something.
    I am sure Bruce is trying his best.
    However, people get judged on performance. Jr was not very popular on RZ in his later years when injuries took their toll.
    I'm sure Hoover and Jumbo are trying their best too, but they are going to get judged harshly too.

    Bruce has had two years of replacement level production, and has been paid a lot of money. He was loved here before he went into a tailspin. Probably the most popular player ever on RZ in his peak.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  12. #550
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cannon View Post

    I would be fine giving Bruce a 5-6 year, 75-90m contract. It's actually perfect because he'll be worth that much over that time, and then you get only his, most likely, productive seasons. It also means there's a guy that can step in at 1B if Votto falls off a cliff in say 2-3 years (he is going to be 33 after all) .
    1. Bruce is not a 1b, he simply can not play it without a ton of work. It really doesn't make sense at this stage of his career to focus on learning work. He just can't do it. I appreciate his effort last year, but it was a failed experiment.

    2. Even if Bruce could play 1b, why invest so much in a potential backup 1b if Votto falls off the cliff. When Votto falls off the cliff, we are going to be pinched due to his salary. But that's ok. We gave Votto that contract to keep him around in our competitive window. I won't mind having him around in his golden years when he's less productive.

    3. Bruce is such a high risk player. Why invest so much in him? You don't know if you are going to get 800 OPS Bruce or 720 OPS Bruce. And why sign Bruce to approximately age 35? That makes the risk even higher. Invest in the future, the young kids we have. Wouldn't you rather be able to extend Reed (or another young star) in the future as opposed to having an old Bruce on the roster?
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  13. #551
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    23,466

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    Cannon --you're list is a list of guys that played in the PEDS era -- players are aging more like they used to -that's what PEDS do --they give you the fountain of youth. The context has changed. We're back to pre-1993 baseball. You're not adjusting for that.

    If you want to pay a guy 18 million for 2.5 WINS -you can....you might get the same value from a good AAAA player. I'm not adverse to paying him -I believe the Reds have more money than they claim, but I think you could spend the money a lot better.
    uh uh. Because while PEDS are trending downward (I assume), healthier living, year round training, biometric training, legal supplements, and a general better idea of what is and is not healthy have replaced them.

    The John Kruk types are no longer the norm, and even the guys that are MASSIVELY overweight are healthier than they would have been 23 years ago.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  14. Likes:

    Wonderful Monds (06-15-2016)

  15. #552
    rest in power, king Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    11,658

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    uh uh. Because while PEDS are trending downward (I assume), healthier living, year round training, biometric training, legal supplements, and a general better idea of what is and is not healthy have replaced them.

    The John Kruk types are no longer the norm, and even the guys that are MASSIVELY overweight are healthier than they would have been 23 years ago.
    "Sure thing, man."

    - Pablo Sandoval's belt

  16. #553
    Member klw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    15,693

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
    Pros: Can't indulge in as many fancy coffees, because of the diabetes.

    Cons: Diabetes is bad.
    Diabetes pro: Peripheral neuropathy makes it less painful to foul a ball off your foot.

    Diabetes con: Peripheral neuropathy makes it dangerous to warm your feet by the fire.

  17. Likes:

    Raisor (06-15-2016),Wonderful Monds (06-15-2016),_Sir_Charles_ (06-15-2016)

  18. #554
    rest in power, king Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    11,658

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by klw View Post
    Diabetes pro: Peripheral neuropathy makes it less painful to foul a ball off your foot.

    Diabetes con: Peripheral neuropathy makes it dangerous to warm your feet by the fire.
    Diabetes Pro: Adam Duvall

    Diabetes Amateur: Jay Cutler

  19. #555
    Stat geek...and proud
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Paris, OH
    Posts
    3,183

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cannon View Post
    Again I put him right around his 2012 season but a bit better offensively this year. Maybe 3-4 WAR.
    For the full year? Or year to date? That's way too high if you mean year to date considering Trout is at 3 something.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator