Turn Off Ads?
Page 56 of 67 FirstFirst ... 64652535455565758596066 ... LastLast
Results 826 to 840 of 1003

Thread: Royals interested in Bruce?

  1. #826
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    38,000

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Why in the world would the Reds trade DeSclafani? Last time I checked, Reds need pitching.

    Verdugo is a must. I would ask for either Barnes, Bellinger, or Sterling Heredia as the second piece.

  2. Likes:

    mth123 (06-26-2016),Redeyecat (06-27-2016),Revering4Blue (06-26-2016)

  3. #827
    SSG, Red Army Choir Guacarock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Bellevue, Kentucky
    Posts
    1,515

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    Please, no more fleas. The Reds have Hamilton and Peraza and Johnson isn't an upgrade over either of them. I'd rather have an international slot instead of Johnson. The Dodgers really can't use them this year.
    I'm not opposed to the Reds grabbing Verdugo and Barnes at all. But I do think Verdugo is the main prize and, if that's so, the Dodgers in surrendering him might not be so inclined to also give up Barnes. That's why I raised Johnson as an alternative, because Dodgers might decide he's expendable given the fact they will also have Calhoun ready to bring up soon. Personally, I don't think Calhoun will stick at 2B, but that's the Dodgers' problem to sort out.

    Either trade -- Verdugo-Barnes or Verdugo-Johnson -- would make more sense for the Reds than what we are likely to get off the Giants, so it definitely makes sense to be courting the Dodgers. As always, they have the pitching to go all the way, but their offense isn't delivering at all in the kind of way they could expect for the balance of 2016 with Bruce on board.
    Last edited by Guacarock; 06-26-2016 at 02:10 PM.

  4. Likes:

    REDREAD (06-26-2016)

  5. #828
    Playoff Veteran sdwagers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Liberty Township, OH
    Posts
    2,104

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    I'd say no on dealing any starters. Finnegan and Lamb haven't exactly established themselves, Iglesias may be limited to the pen and Stephenson can't throw strikes.
    Disagree on Finny... He's proven he can start. Lamb not yet...

    Lamb has LA connections and may be preferred on Cingrani if LA wants a LHP.
    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    sdwagers for Reds GM!

  6. #829
    Playoff Veteran sdwagers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Liberty Township, OH
    Posts
    2,104

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guacarock View Post
    I'm not opposed to the Reds grabbing Verdugo and Barnes at all. But I do think Verdugo is the main prize and, if that's so, the Dodgers in surrendering him might not be so inclined to also give up Barnes. That's why I raised Johnson as an alternative, because Dodgers might decide he's expendable given the fact they will also have
    Calhoun ready to bring up soon. Personally, I don't think Calhoun will stick at 2B, but that's the Dodgers' problem to sort out.

    Either trade -- Verdugo-Barnes or Verdugo-Johnson -- would make more sense for the Reds than what we are likely to get off the Giants, so it definitely makes sense to be courting the Dodgers. As always, they have the pitching to go all the way, but their offense isn't delivering at all in the kind of way they could expect for the balance of 2016 with Bruce on board.
    Calhoun is a corner OFer I think for the future.

    Verdugo was the desired guy when Frazier left in the three way trade with LA and CWS.... He's a coveted bat...
    Bruce just hit HR 17 - so his price is high as ever.
    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    sdwagers for Reds GM!

  7. #830
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    38,727

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by sdwagers View Post
    Disagree on Finny... He's proven he can start. Lamb not yet...

    Lamb has LA connections and may be preferred on Cingrani if LA wants a LHP.
    1.52 K:BB ratio. 4.90 FIP. Finnegan shouldn't be written in ink. Not sure he's one of the best 5 even if Iglesias stays in the pen and Bailey is shipped off ASAP.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  8. #831
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    38,727

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guacarock View Post
    I'm not opposed to the Reds grabbing Verdugo and Barnes at all. But I do think Verdugo is the main prize and, if that's so, the Dodgers in surrendering him might not be so inclined to also give up Barnes. That's why I raised Johnson as an alternative, because Dodgers might decide he's expendable given the fact they will also have Calhoun ready to bring up soon. Personally, I don't think Calhoun will stick at 2B, but that's the Dodgers' problem to sort out.

    Either trade -- Verdugo-Barnes or Verdugo-Johnson -- would make more sense for the Reds than what we are likely to get off the Giants, so it definitely makes sense to be courting the Dodgers. As always, they have the pitching to go all the way, but their offense isn't delivering at all in the kind of way they could expect for the balance of 2016 with Bruce on board.
    Again, no interest in Johnson. I'd rather have international slots along with Verdugo or Barnes before subbing Johnson.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  9. Likes:

    sdwagers (06-26-2016)

  10. #832
    Playoff Veteran sdwagers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Liberty Township, OH
    Posts
    2,104

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    Again, no interest in Johnson. I'd rather have international slots along with Verdugo or Barnes before subbing Johnson.
    Micah Johnson is a Jose Peraza / Billy Hamilton wannabe. No thanks. Calhoun and Barnes are the only other guys I consider for LA.
    Last edited by sdwagers; 06-26-2016 at 02:21 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    sdwagers for Reds GM!

  11. #833
    Playoff Veteran sdwagers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Liberty Township, OH
    Posts
    2,104

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    1.52 K:BB ratio. 4.90 FIP. Finnegan shouldn't be written in ink. Not sure he's one of the best 5 even if Iglesias stays in the pen and Bailey is shipped off ASAP.
    Walks and HRs have hurt Finny for sure.... I think he's pressing
    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    sdwagers for Reds GM!

  12. #834
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    19,800

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by sdwagers View Post
    Walks and HRs have hurt Finny for sure.... I think he's pressing
    I think just the opposite. I think he's in the stages of learning to pitch successfully in the majors. That means ups and downs that are going to skew the numbers somewhat. But he's trending in the right direction (unlike Straily).
    Empathy is about standing in someone else's shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes. Not only is empathy hard to outsource and automate, but it makes the world a better place.

    -- Daniel H. Pink

  13. Likes:

    Old school 1983 (06-26-2016)

  14. #835
    SSG, Red Army Choir Guacarock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Bellevue, Kentucky
    Posts
    1,515

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    Again, no interest in Johnson. I'd rather have international slots along with Verdugo or Barnes before subbing Johnson.
    Got it. And I'm not that opposed to your viewpoint. I just see Verdugo as the key to a trade, and Barnes or Johnson as secondary pieces -- Barnes if we're uncertain whether Mesoraco will return in good shape; Johnson if we want to limit Phillips' plate appearances next season. I guess I have seen as much of the eroding Phillips as I want. But then again, it's doubtful Mesoraco will ever be the same again, either. So either variation has some merit, in my book.

  15. #836
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    41,611

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by sdwagers View Post
    Walks and HRs have hurt Finny for sure.... I think he's pressing
    Maybe in May.

    But Finnegan has had a strong June, which is very encouraging for a 23 year old pitcher. We've seen other guys slump and just go downhill.

    I'm confident that, if healthy, Finnegan will be in the Opening Day rotation next year. Hard to project long term with trades, etc., but I think he's done well.

  16. Likes:

    REDREAD (06-26-2016),Revering4Blue (06-26-2016),sdwagers (06-26-2016)

  17. #837
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    41,611

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guacarock View Post
    Got it. And I'm not that opposed to your viewpoint. I just see Verdugo as the key to a trade, and Barnes or Johnson as secondary pieces -- Barnes if we're uncertain whether Mesoraco will return in good shape; Johnson if we want to limit Phillips' plate appearances next season. I guess I have seen as much of the eroding Phillips as I want. But then again, it's doubtful Mesoraco will ever be the same again, either. So either variation has some merit, in my book.
    If the Reds get Verdugo, I wouldn't expect too much of a secondary piece.

    The salary dump is a huge part of this, and a top ten Dodgers prospect is going to be the main return.

    Later down the top 30 list there are several nice pitching prospects, and that would be ok for a second player.
    Last edited by Kc61; 06-26-2016 at 02:52 PM.

  18. Likes:

    LoganBuck (06-26-2016),REDREAD (06-26-2016)

  19. #838
    Playoff Veteran sdwagers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Liberty Township, OH
    Posts
    2,104

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Verdugo- "Offensively, you're going to have your ups and downs. Defensively, you can go out every day and give it your all. When you throw a guy out at any base, pitchers love it. I take pride in that."

    .... Cincy fans will eat that up.....
    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    sdwagers for Reds GM!

  20. Likes:

    Tom Servo (06-26-2016)

  21. #839
    Member corkedbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,046

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I still haven't changed my mind on the Reds dealing Bruce - it needs to happen, but I'm coming around to keeping him around unless thy get their price - and that price is rising. Before the season, I would have been ecstatic if you'd told me they could get one solid "B" level prospect. Now I'd be disappointed if the settle for less than two and we're fast approaching an "A").

    Dodgers - they need to send two of their ten best prospects above A ball. I agree that Verdugo must be one and I'd actually ask for Grant Holmes as the second. When they say no, I'd be OK with Montas, Bellinger, Barnes or Cotton. I'd also be willing to add a secondary piece for Holmes or two of the last group.

    Indians - I really hold out for Frazier or Zimmer, but I might take Tyler Naquin and a second prospect (but it would have to be a very good one). I'd add a kicker for Frazier/Zimmer.

    Red Sox - Andrew Benintendi or Yoan Moncada - that's it. I might even overpay and include Stephenson with Bruce for one of them, but that's the price.

    Mets - Brandon Nimmo or Michael Conforto and Gavin Cecchini (the Reds throwing in piece)

    Royals - Three from among Kyle Zimmer, Bubba Starling, Hunter Dozier, Jorge Bonifacio or Ryan O'Hearn (I might throw in a small sweetener fif Zimmer is included).

    Giants - Christian Arroyo is a must, plus one of Tyler Beede, Mac Williamson or Andrew Susac

    White Sox - Tim Anderson and Adam Engel (Meh)

    Rays - Mike Mahook or Willie Adames plus another piece

    Texas - Lewis Brinson and Jurickson Profar (the Reds thow in another player).

    Blue Jays - Dalton Pompey and Richard Urena. (Meh)

    The Angels, Tigers & Orioles - don't have enough in the upper levels of their entire systems to interest me.

    I might take a little less in a couple of cases or sweeten a bit in others, but the above would be what it would take to move Jay now.
    Last edited by corkedbat; 06-26-2016 at 04:37 PM.

  22. Likes:

    Benihana (06-26-2016),Cannon (06-26-2016),Redeyecat (06-27-2016)

  23. #840
    Member corkedbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,046

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    nm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator