Turn Off Ads?
Page 65 of 67 FirstFirst ... 155561626364656667 LastLast
Results 961 to 975 of 1003

Thread: Royals interested in Bruce?

  1. #961
    Daffy Duck RedTeamGo!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    24,082

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I think Puig would go nuts in GABP, but either way, I'm sure he will be better than a return Bruce will fetch at the end of the month when his OPS drops 60-70 points.

  2. #962
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    62,259

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I'm going to go start a twitter account and claim that the Angels offered Mike Trout for Bruce and the Reds said no.

    It will be on twitter so it will be true.
    Go Gators!

  3. Likes:

    sdwagers (07-04-2016)

  4. #963
    Member Z-Fly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    1,785

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    You guys do know that aren't really buying and selling in a stock market. Teams will know everything that you know, plus some.
    WHEN DOES IT STOP!?!?

  5. Likes:

    alwaysawarrior (07-05-2016),Elam (07-05-2016),mth123 (07-04-2016),RiverRat13 (07-04-2016),Tom Servo (07-04-2016)

  6. #964
    Playoff Veteran sdwagers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Liberty Township, OH
    Posts
    2,104

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedTeamGo! View Post
    I think Puig would go nuts in GABP, but either way, I'm sure he will be better than a return Bruce will fetch at the end of the month when his OPS drops 60-70 points.
    I 'll go nuts if I have to see is lazy play in RF.... goodness... he's the laziest "star level" player I 've ever seen on the field. just say no to Puig..
    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    sdwagers for Reds GM!

  7. #965
    Daffy Duck RedTeamGo!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    24,082

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by KronoRed View Post
    I'm going to go start a twitter account and claim that the Angels offered Mike Trout for Bruce and the Reds said no.

    It will be on twitter so it will be true.
    That's not what happened. A poster stated in another thread it was reported on MLB network.

  8. #966
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    62,259

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Still, it's all hearsay and rumor, I also maintain it would be a terrible return for Bruce.
    Go Gators!

  9. Likes:

    Ron Madden (07-05-2016)

  10. #967
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    Bruce is a highly known quantity. And his value ain't that high. Simmer.
    Yea. I realize all the buyers want to examine their options (and some may want to procrastinate a trade to evaluate their in house options a few more weeks).

    At the same time, if the Reds get a decent offer for Bruce now, they should pounce on it. Don't hold out for 10-20% more.
    Note, I have no idea if there are any decent offers on the table.
    I am pretty sure a lot of RZers are overvaluing him though.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  11. #968
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    41,612

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    Bruce is a highly known quantity. And his value ain't that high. Simmer.
    Yes, Bruce is a highly known quantity. That's the problem.

    If I were a team interested in Bruce - I say, wait until late July, there's a good chance he'll slump. Reds are sellers, wait them out, price could go way down.

    If I'm the Reds, I try to finalize a deal at the All Star Break. That's when the market usually starts. Wouldn't wait for another hot streak, too iffy.
    Last edited by Kc61; 07-05-2016 at 01:33 PM.

  12. Likes:

    REDREAD (07-05-2016)

  13. #969
    Playoff Veteran sdwagers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Liberty Township, OH
    Posts
    2,104

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    Yes, Bruce is a highly known quantity. That's the problem.

    If I were a team interested in Bruce - I say, wait until late July, there's a good chance he'll slump. Reds are sellers, wait them out, price could go way down.

    If I'm the Reds, I trade him at the All Star Break. That's when the market usually starts unofficially to be open. Wouldn't wait for another hot streak, too iffy.
    I think the Reds are standing pat to get a good offer given the current field.... however - ASG rosters will be announced tonight, so if Bruce is going to SD - he will be a Red for at least another week (Reds won't pull another Jeff Shaw). If not - I think he gets traded stat.

    I think right now the Adam Duvall goes to the ASG and that's all.
    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    sdwagers for Reds GM!

  14. #970
    Member Z-Fly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    1,785

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    He just hit a Homerun. Trade him.
    WHEN DOES IT STOP!?!?

  15. Likes:

    REDREAD (07-06-2016),RedTeamGo! (07-05-2016)

  16. #971
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,305

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I don't think that Bruce is a mystery to any team.

    A week slump or hot streak won't affect his value.

    He is what he is, an inconsistent hitter who is having a better year due to better health.

    We need to get a decent return for him regardless. I don't imagine any team will look at him like a stock price and try to time trading for him at the end of a slump so they can buy low on him.

    Though, I do like the way the Reds sold short on Latos to the Marlins.

  17. Likes:

    Tom Servo (07-05-2016)

  18. #972
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,758

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    Chuckie, I am getting a little concerned about how familiar you are with Taylor Swift and Meyer
    Shake it off.

    Who says I can't get stoned? Call up a girl that I used to know. Fake love for an hour or so, who says I can't get stoned?

  19. #973
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,305

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuckie View Post
    Shake it off.

    Who says I can't get stoned? Call up a girl that I used to know. Fake love for an hour or so, who says I can't get stoned?
    I think the better question is "Who says you're not always stoned".

    Level with us Chuckie, have you ever posted on RedsZone when you are cold stone sober?

    I might bet the farm on that.

  20. Likes:

    Patrick Bateman (07-05-2016)

  21. #974
    Gary Redus Ruled
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Albion NY
    Posts
    699

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Walts M.O is to strike when the iron is ICE COLD....we all know that.
    Hoping for another Reds October

  22. #975
    Member reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    29,546

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    People complaining about not trading Bruce while his numbers were at their absolute pick three weeks ago are hilarious to me. Do you think other teams don't know Bruce is a streak hitter, and just looked at his slash line and were eager to give up the farm for him? Come on.
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    A little bit off topic, but do you guys think that Jesse Winker profiles more like Pete Rose or is he just the next Hal Morris??

  23. Likes:

    Donder (07-05-2016),Tom Servo (07-05-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator