Turn Off Ads?
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 59 of 59

Thread: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

  1. #46
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    14,097

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    I hate "power rankings" in all sports.

    I think they are the dumbest idea anyone has ever come up with as sports topics.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  2. Likes:

    WrongVerb (02-10-2026)

  3. #47
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    20,204

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    Quote Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
    Where would you rank the pitching staff as a whole? They may not have the top end that other teams have, but there is a real chance that the Reds are going to enter almost every game with a SP who is at minimum slightly better than league average.
    Somewhere in the 3-4th range. Only Philly is very clearly better, I think, and the Reds do have legit #1 upside. The rotation should be up there among the best while the bullpen should be decent.

    They won 83 games last year with an offense that was bad. If they can just get at a little more production from the aforementioned guys, as well as Geno providing some thump in the order, they should be able to approach 90 wins. I think the baseline on a normal season is 83 wins just like last year, but I think the upside is considerably higher. But a lot of the upside is "hope" and I don't really like to put the success/failure of a season on "hope."
    I mean, yeah. If we hang on to all the good breaks from last year and then sprinkle on a few more on top, there we go. 90 wins. But I think we all tend to fall into the trap of doing projections based on realistic optimistic projections instead of actual expected value. We take for granted what went right in the past and imagine less going wrong.

    For example, we intuitively pencil in Greene for 25 starts of a 3.00 ERA, a 3.5 to 4.0 WAR season. That's a very reasonable outcome, so what? I don't think he's going to have problems with untimely homers pushing his ERA up to 3.80. I don't think he's going to miss half the season with an oblique injury. But there are a ton of similarly reasonable outcomes that we simply don't include in our gut-level assessments. Considering all the possibilities for his season, that 4 WAR season is probably like the 75th percentile.

    Could Sal Stewart hit .260/.330/.480? Absolutely! Could Geno hit 40 bombs again? Will Pagan put up another sub 3.00 ERA? Will Elly take a step forward and go 30/50 while playing good defense? Will Lodolo make 28 starts again? Will Abbott make 29 with an ERA a run below his peripherals? Etc. Etc. It's all possible. None of that, on a case-by-case basis, is unreasonable.

    But 90 wins means most of that 75th percentile type stuff is happening and/or we're getting significant production from unexpected places. More likely, some of the good stuff happens while a fair amount of bad stuff happens too. Maybe Sal is CES 2.0. Maybe Lodolo's blisters flare up repeatedly. Maybe Greene blows out his arm again. Maybe Elly deals with persistent lower body issues. Maybe Abbot's smoke and mirrors act falls flat.

    You factor in all the maybes in both directions and we're looking at a low 80s expectation with a good reason to hope for 90. I'd rather be the Dodgers and have a low 90s expectation. Unfortunately that's just not reality.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  4. Likes:

    mth123 (02-10-2026)

  5. #48
    Waitin til next year bucksfan2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    13,184

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    Somewhere in the 3-4th range. Only Philly is very clearly better, I think, and the Reds do have legit #1 upside. The rotation should be up there among the best while the bullpen should be decent.



    I mean, yeah. If we hang on to all the good breaks from last year and then sprinkle on a few more on top, there we go. 90 wins. But I think we all tend to fall into the trap of doing projections based on realistic optimistic projections instead of actual expected value. We take for granted what went right in the past and imagine less going wrong.

    For example, we intuitively pencil in Greene for 25 starts of a 3.00 ERA, a 3.5 to 4.0 WAR season. That's a very reasonable outcome, so what? I don't think he's going to have problems with untimely homers pushing his ERA up to 3.80. I don't think he's going to miss half the season with an oblique injury. But there are a ton of similarly reasonable outcomes that we simply don't include in our gut-level assessments. Considering all the possibilities for his season, that 4 WAR season is probably like the 75th percentile.

    Could Sal Stewart hit .260/.330/.480? Absolutely! Could Geno hit 40 bombs again? Will Pagan put up another sub 3.00 ERA? Will Elly take a step forward and go 30/50 while playing good defense? Will Lodolo make 28 starts again? Will Abbott make 29 with an ERA a run below his peripherals? Etc. Etc. It's all possible. None of that, on a case-by-case basis, is unreasonable.

    But 90 wins means most of that 75th percentile type stuff is happening and/or we're getting significant production from unexpected places. More likely, some of the good stuff happens while a fair amount of bad stuff happens too. Maybe Sal is CES 2.0. Maybe Lodolo's blisters flare up repeatedly. Maybe Greene blows out his arm again. Maybe Elly deals with persistent lower body issues. Maybe Abbot's smoke and mirrors act falls flat.

    You factor in all the maybes in both directions and we're looking at a low 80s expectation with a good reason to hope for 90. I'd rather be the Dodgers and have a low 90s expectation. Unfortunately that's just not reality.
    We can put on our red colored glasses and make unrealistic predictions all day long. Its what Feb and March are for baseball, everyone has a chance before the games start. April and May often bring about more sober realizations about what kind of club you have.

    I think the Reds errored in not addressing the offense enough. I like the Geno signing, I think he could be huge for this club, but also recognize that it could end poorly for both parties.

    I think where most (if any) of my optimism arises is the pitching staff. And they may not have a ace caliber pitcher, nor do they have a top two that some teams can run out. But there is a real possibility that they will run out an above league average pitcher (at minimum) for most starts this season. That doesn't include what Burns or Lowder can provide if they kick the door down. I think it raises the floor to an extent that we haven't seen in a few years.

    To counter the bolded part, sure there was good luck last year, but there were also some anomalies. They won 2 games when they were trailing after 8 innings, going 2-65 and were 3-12 in extra innings. The extra inning thing is crazy considering the ghost runner on 2nd. What if results like that normalize. What if the extra innings win percentage mirrors their regular season record? What if their trailing after 8 innings mirrors league average?

    When looking at the 2025 Reds there were some pretty big holes, and obvious holes, but there were some statistical anomalies when it came to late inning performance that you would have to think work themselves out.

  6. #49
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    40,990

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    With more HR capability, Reds should be better than last season. With decent health, they should win more than last year’s 83 games. I don’t know where that puts them in a power ranking but it’s favorable.

    The main deficit is left handed hitting. The better RHPs will take advantage of the Reds’ sea of righty bats. Maybe that gets rectified somewhere along the line. Could use a stellar outfield defender too, OF defense is ordinary.

  7. #50
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    528

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    The Reds pitching staff is very good but there are still questions with it. I like their chances going into the season but I am also realistic to the fact that it is not a pitching staff without some questions too.

    How will Pagan at age 35 do considering he has never had back to back solid seasons and last year was the second best season of his career.
    Will Santillan show any ill effects after being used a LOT last year and never pitching that much in his career.
    Martinez while not great still pitched 165 innings, I think we all rightly assume that Burns will be better but what if he struggles who will pick up those innings and will they be at the level Martinez was.
    Is Lowder going to be healthy and if so what will he contribute to the team, he was pretty bad last season in the minors but was solid for the Reds in 24.
    Lodolo started 28 games last year, 7 more then any other season of his career. Can he do that again or will he battle injuries like he has in the past and even last year.
    Can Hunter stay healthy all season.

  8. #51
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    19,736

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    I hate "power rankings" in all sports.

    I think they are the dumbest idea anyone has ever come up with as sports topics.
    Same here. Seems more like a marketing gimmick than something with any real substance.
    Empathy is about standing in someone else's shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes. Not only is empathy hard to outsource and automate, but it makes the world a better place.

    -- Daniel H. Pink

  9. #52
    Future Fame of Holler WildcatFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    3,153

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    I hate "power rankings" in all sports.

    I think they are the dumbest idea anyone has ever come up with as sports topics.
    I think it's a fun way to follow the story of a season, especially in MLB. The Athletic does a particularly good job explaining its rankings every Monday. Much easier than trying to keep up with gamers every day or two.
    "I never argue with people who say baseball is boring, because baseball is boring. And then, suddenly, it isn't. And that's what makes it great." - Joe Posnanski

  10. #53
    Living in the Past RiverfrontRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    2,481

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    Quote Originally Posted by WrongVerb View Post
    Same here. Seems more like a marketing gimmick than something with any real substance.
    It has people discussing it on a message board. So it's working.

  11. #54
    How u doin
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    549

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    I think the Pirates are going to be the sleeper team in baseball this year.

  12. #55
    Living in the Past RiverfrontRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    2,481

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverfrontRed View Post
    Mets, lol
    Mets lost their 10th game in a row today.

  13. #56
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    14,097

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverfrontRed View Post
    Mets lost their 10th game in a row today.
    REDS won their 10th game in a row on this same day of games decided by one or two runs.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  14. #57
    Member wlf WV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    huntington,wv
    Posts
    1,271

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    We're again in the basement of MLB teams in batting average, 30th out of 30 ! We are weak.
    There's no reason to think we can continue to wear out this bullpen and win.

    You would hope all aspects would improve, but I don't see the bullpen can get any better.
    Last edited by wlf WV; Yesterday at 08:37 AM.
    May the Lord bless

  15. #58
    Member redsrule2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    3,773

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    Reds Pitching are in the bottom 1/3rd of MLB for Strikeouts, Walks, and WHIP - but somehow near the top for ERA, HR allowed.

    That can't bode well for their pitching going forward. It seems like we've been getting amazingly lucky on the pitching side and scoring runs when they matter (1 run wins), but that can't continue. Not great.
    redsrule2500
    Go Reds!
    “I’m a normal guy blessed with the ability to hit a baseball.” - Sean Casey

  16. #59
    Member Sea Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    35,285

    Re: NL Power Rankings: Where Are the Reds?

    The idea is that the pitching will regress and the hitting will get better. It’s great to be on the winning side of all these games. Last year we were bemoaning all the well pitched games we were wasting. Lots of 1-0 losses


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator