Turn Off Ads?
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 54

Thread: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    80

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Curt Schilling should be in the HOF


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #32
    Member marcshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Zeta Reticuli
    Posts
    10,042

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    I thought Lefty Gomez would be on the list. He scattered a few good seasons into a mediocre career and was rewarded for it thirty years later. I'm not going to go cliche and mention the team he played for, so I'll quit typing now.
    It is on the whole probable that we continually dream, but that consciousness makes such a noise that we do not hear it. Carl Jung.

  4. Likes:

    RedlegJake (07-15-2020)

  5. #33
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    12,591

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by CySeymour View Post
    I always felt if Sutter was in, then Dan Quisenberry should be in as well.
    Though valid, I always hate that argument (instead of agreeing that Sutter should not have been in. Every time someone undeserved goes in, it lowers the bar.
    "One problem with people who have no vices is that they're pretty sure to have some annoying virtues."

  6. Likes:

    RedsFanInMS (07-16-2020)

  7. #34
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Saint Joseph, Mo
    Posts
    9,731

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    Though valid, I always hate that argument (instead of agreeing that Sutter should not have been in. Every time someone undeserved goes in, it lowers the bar.
    I agree. Case in point Ross Youngs vs Curt Walker. Walker has a statistical dead heat in numbers but he played for the Reds while Youngs played for McGraw's Giants and he had a tragically young death. I don't think either is HoFer quality but using this old argument Walker deserves to be in if Youngs is in.
    99% of all numbers only tell 33% of the story so when looking at the numbers remember that numbers is plural...

  8. #35
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,182

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by RedlegJake View Post
    I agree. Case in point Ross Youngs vs Curt Walker. Walker has a statistical dead heat in numbers but he played for the Reds while Youngs played for McGraw's Giants and he had a tragically young death. I don't think either is HoFer quality but using this old argument Walker deserves to be in if Youngs is in.
    This guy is responsible for a lot of chafe in the HOF


  9. Likes:

    RedlegJake (07-15-2020)

  10. #36
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Saint Joseph, Mo
    Posts
    9,731

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Frisch campaigned for several Giants including the article's mentioned Freddie Lindstrom as well as Youngs and Travis Jackson
    99% of all numbers only tell 33% of the story so when looking at the numbers remember that numbers is plural...

  11. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    1,954

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    He created havoc for the Cardinals, his contributions in their pennant winning years really were big, he played it out on some teams that didn't measure up and it looked like he was chasing numbers, perhaps he was. Vada Pinson had 305 steals, Brock was CAUGHT stealing 307 times
    Lou Brock was the star position player for the most dominant NL team during the Cards great 60s seasons. Look at the rest of the starting eight and you'll realize it. Just about every team had an Orlando Cepeda, Flood was good but didn't produce the runs that Brock did. McCarver was decent but he wasn't Johnny Bench. Javier, Maxwell, Shannon and Maris were all supporting players. I remember watching the 1968 World Series, first one I ever watched, and when the Tigers inning was over and Brock was due up, they would adnauseum say "And The Man will be due up next".

    He was a shoe in for the HOF and there should be no argument whatsoever as to whether he belongs. PERIOD.

  12. Likes:

    cumberlandreds (07-16-2020),mth123 (07-16-2020)

  13. #38
    Member marcshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Zeta Reticuli
    Posts
    10,042

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    I had a pair of Lou Brock Converses when I was young. I was so slow he came to my house personally and demanded I burn them.
    It is on the whole probable that we continually dream, but that consciousness makes such a noise that we do not hear it. Carl Jung.

  14. Likes:

    M2 (07-15-2020),RichRed (07-16-2020)

  15. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    1,675

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Bill Mazeroski, a glorified JUlian Javier

  16. #40
    Member RedsFanInMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    572

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    Though valid, I always hate that argument (instead of agreeing that Sutter should not have been in. Every time someone undeserved goes in, it lowers the bar.
    This. Both the Baseball HOF and Pro Football HOF have become Hall's of Very Good instead of Hall of Fame's.

  17. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,319

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Red View Post
    It's a testament to just how good MLB catchers are when even Rickey Henderson was thrown out on 19% of his steal attempts (the year he stole 130 it was 24% of the time).
    Advanced stats would tell you that when he stole 130 bases and got throw out 24% of he time, he would have been pretty much better off staying on the base.

  18. #42
    .377 in 1905 CySeymour's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    4,553

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    Though valid, I always hate that argument (instead of agreeing that Sutter should not have been in. Every time someone undeserved goes in, it lowers the bar.
    I agree, and honestly I'm not suggesting Quiz should be in, nor did I really think Sutter should have been.
    ...the 2-2 to Woodsen and here it comes...and it is swung on and missed! And Tom Browning has pitched a perfect game! Twenty-seven outs in a row, and he is being mobbed by his teammates, just to the thirdbase side of the mound.

  19. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    530

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    HOF is now irrelevant. It used to be fun to debate, but why bother now? Harold Baines is a HOFer and Pete Rose is not. So really, what's the point of it?

  20. Likes:

    mth123 (07-16-2020)

  21. #44
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,567

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Advanced stats would tell you that when he stole 130 bases and got throw out 24% of he time, he would have been pretty much better off staying on the base.
    The chart in this article says otherwise. His rate was 76%. Around 70% is the break even point.

    https://batflipsandnerds.com/2018/11...e-stolen-base/
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  22. #45
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,182

    Re: Ranking the 25 worst ever Hall-of-Fame selections

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix2 View Post
    HOF is now irrelevant. It used to be fun to debate, but why bother now? Harold Baines is a HOFer and Pete Rose is not. So really, what's the point of it?
    If that's your take then Candy Cummings should have already broken your spirit, I guess the point is it's a museum that is meant to celebrate and stimulate one's mind. As for Pete, lots of his stuff is in there, he's just not

  23. Likes:

    Kingspoint (07-16-2020)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator