Turn Off Ads?
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 110

Thread: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

  1. #31
    Member Jpup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Southern KY
    Posts
    6,997

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    Quote Originally Posted by jojo View Post
    Eric Milton had an ERA of 3.02 in the 8 games he won for the Reds during the '06 season.
    Mike Lincoln has one of the better curves that I saw last year. Comparing Eric Milton to Mike Lincoln is silly. Lincoln is coming out of the pen and makes 2 million. That's grasping for straws.
    "My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton

  2. #32
    Five Tool Fool jojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,390

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    Quote Originally Posted by Austin Kearns View Post
    At what point does that type of number start becoming a trend, rather than just a misnomer ready for correction?
    I'm comfortable with the notion that it's pretty safe to expect something like 13% from him again next year.
    "This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner

  3. #33
    Flash the leather!
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    Anybody ever stop and think about what we're saying here. We're talking like 2 million dollars is chump-change. It doesn't seem that long ago when I would've fainted hearing that a ballplayer was raking that in for one year.

    Okay, nevermind. Carry on.

  4. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    10,295

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    He put up a 4.51 FIP in 2008, largely influenced a poor HR rate. However, that HR rate was way above what you'd expect and he's a strong groundball guy. Maybe I'm crazy but I don't hate it. I just hope it means we aren't bringing back Weathers.
    I'm with you. The contract isn't crazy either. This isn't a super sexy move, but I think it's a good 1.

    I hope the Gary Majewski era in Cincinnati is ending more than anything else.

  5. #35
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,358

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    The acquisition of mediocre players has been linked to mediocre results.

    Just more of the same, I would say.

  6. #36
    Five Tool Fool jojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,390

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    Quote Originally Posted by Jpup View Post
    Mike Lincoln has one of the better curves that I saw last year. Comparing Eric Milton to Mike Lincoln is silly. Lincoln is coming out of the pen and makes 2 million. That's grasping for straws.
    Not really. His curveball has yet to translate into him being an above average relief pitcher. He's basically an arm.

    My point about Milton wasn't that they are twins but rather that saying Lincoln is pretty darn good when he is right really applies to just about everyone.
    "This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner

  7. #37
    Member Jpup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Southern KY
    Posts
    6,997

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    Quote Originally Posted by jojo View Post
    Not really. His curveball has yet to translate into him being an above average relief pitcher. He's basically an arm.

    My point about Milton wasn't that they are twins but rather that saying Lincoln is pretty darn good when he is right really applies to just about everyone.
    not really, but that's your opinion. I totally disagree.
    "My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,315

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    You don't want to be relying on a bunch of first and second year guys in the pen. Lincoln makes a million and change over the minimum -- big deal. Depth is important for the pen too, and having someone like Lincoln will give unfinished bullpenners (Fisher, Roenicke, Manuel, et al) time to hone their craft in AAA.

  9. #39
    Member Superdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,812

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    I don't see the problem here. Lincoln's got good stuff and showed a lot of promise last year for a guy who hadn't pitched in forever. 2 million a year seems pretty reasonable to me.

  10. #40
    Mailing it in Cyclone792's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    6,957

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    If this coincides with the Reds punting both Weathers and Majewski - and grabbing that compensation pick for Weathers - then I can tolerate it. I'm not particularly happy about a second year for Lincoln either, but at some point I'd have probably given $2.5 million to somebody just to get rid of Majewski.

    Lincoln does give up too many freaking long balls though.
    The Lost Generation: Since 1996
    Zero playoff series victories

  11. #41
    Five Tool Fool jojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,390

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    Quote Originally Posted by Jpup View Post
    not really, but that's your opinion. I totally disagree.
    That's perfectly fair but he'll be 34 next spring. When will he blossom?
    "This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner

  12. #42
    Member camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    12,653

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    I'm still up in the air with how I feel about the contract, but I like that the Reds didn't give this deal to a reliever who's coming off a lucky year. In a way, though, the deal is just ridiculous to me. From 2003-7, which theoretically should have been his prime years, he pitched a total of 66.2 innings, and he pitched poorly during that time to boot. Now, he's getting paid $4 million over two years following a career year. In today's market, that's peanuts, so I'm not going to scream about what a terrible deal this is, but I just wonder if the Reds could have spent a couple more million to get a pitcher with higher upside and/or better track record.

  13. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Newport Beach, CA
    Posts
    8,069

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
    If everyone is okay with bringing him back for one year(I'm assuming everyone expects him to pitch well enough to earn the $2 mill this year,) than the second year isn't a problem.
    If the Reds have a glut of relievers after this year, trading a reliable bullpenner with one year at $2 mill left on his contract won't be hard.

    Complaining about a second year is looking for something to complain about IMO.
    Yeah, that pretty much sums it up for me. Price is right (and yes, it is chump change these days whether we like it or not) so if ya' have to eat the contract it's pretty easy to swallow.

    As HR said, if ya' have a glut of relivers Lincoln shouldn't be too hard to unload.

    Lincoln pretty much guarantees that 'The Majic Man' won't be back and makes it less likely that the Reds will re-sign Weathers (). Those things right there make this an acceptable deal.

    Rem

  14. #44
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    34,933

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    I'm not that happy about this. One year for 2 million would be okay, but even then I could see where Lincoln would struggle and we'd have to DFA him. But two years for a guy who just came out of semi-retirement last year to put up just okay numbers doesn't sit well with me. I'd like for Hot Rod to prove me wrong.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  15. #45
    Titanic Struggles Caveat Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    13,579

    Re: Reds re-sign Mike Lincoln

    I find it tough to get worked up over the guy who will, when everything shakes down, likely wind up slotted as the 5th man out of the bullpen.
    Cincinnati Reds: Farm System Champions 2022

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator