Turn Off Ads?
Page 5 of 67 FirstFirst 1234567891555 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 1003

Thread: Royals interested in Bruce?

  1. #61
    Winning the Human Race TheBigLebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Titletown, FL
    Posts
    11,138

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    Good lord, that's sheer insanity to offer Bruce an extension.
    How about this, don't pick up Bruce's option. Wait him out. Unless he maintains this 800+ OPS for an entire year (which I doubt), he will be available at a bargain basement price in the spring, for a one year contract.
    If Bruce has another 720 OPS season, he's a 4th OF and the market will pay him as such.

    One of the smartest things the Reds did was not to give Bruce that "lifetime contract" that he wanted maybe 4-5 years ago. It sure was tempting then. Thank God the Reds didn't do it.
    Honestly, as bad as that LTD might have been, it'd be more attractive than any of the other albatross LTD's we currently have hanging from our collective necks.
    GO FLORIDA GATORS BASEBALL

  2. #62
    Member kaldaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,852

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by kpresidente View Post
    Although imagine this blueprint for 2018: Bruce in RF, Jesse Winker in LF, Adam Duvall at 3B (his natural position), Eugenio Suarez at SS (his natural position) and Jose Peraza at 2B. Or something like that, maybe switch Peraza and Suarez. That’s a bargain-basement plan and not without flaws. But it’s a plan.

    And it includes keeping Jay Bruce around from 2018-20. Say, at $43 million for 3 years.


    I wouldn't have a problem with that. It also means we have a chance to be decent next year. It also just reiterates why we shouldn't have traded Frazier since a 2017 team with Frazier and Bruce could have a real shot and the only future sacrifice is Peraza > Blandino, which isn't much of a dropoff IMO.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Lost me at "Suarez at SS". And even threw in "(his natural position)" to boot.

  3. Likes:

    kpresidente (05-26-2016),_Sir_Charles_ (05-25-2016)

  4. #63
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,758

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
    Lost me at "Suarez at SS". And even threw in "(his natural position)" to boot.
    Suarez's natural position is "Hoping the NL gets the DH."

  5. #64
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,758

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBigLebowski View Post
    Honestly, as bad as that LTD might have been, it'd be more attractive than any of the other albatross LTD's we currently have hanging from our collective necks.
    You know, other than the Votto, Bailey, BP and Mesoraco contracts, the Reds have done a nice job in this area.

    Hey, we have to laugh to keep from crying. (I'm weeping inside though.)

  6. #65
    Member marcshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Zeta Reticuli
    Posts
    10,140

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuckie View Post
    Suarez's natural position is "Hoping the NL gets the DH."
    Now come on, how bad a defender can he be if he once played shortstop? Like Kevin Mitchell did?
    It is on the whole probable that we continually dream, but that consciousness makes such a noise that we do not hear it. Carl Jung.

  7. Likes:

    '69 (05-25-2016)

  8. #66
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBigLebowski View Post
    Honestly, as bad as that LTD might have been, it'd be more attractive than any of the other albatross LTD's we currently have hanging from our collective necks.
    I'd rather have the current Homer and Votto contracts than a lifetime Contract for Bruce now.
    I'm assuming that it would've been at least 15 million (probably closer to 20 million) a year to extend Bruce to a lifetime contract, because he actually was an awesome player back then.
    Votto will be fine longterm.
    I have a lot more hope of Homer bouncing back from TJ than I do of Bruce sustaining production above replacement level.


    I don't see Phillips' contract as an albotross.. We debate whether it's good or bad, but only 2 seasons left and the Reds realistically have no chance of being competitive before BP's deal is up.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  9. #67
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    10,394

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    I don't see Phillips' contract as an albotross.. We debate whether it's good or bad, but only 2 seasons left and the Reds realistically have no chance of being competitive before BP's deal is up.
    I'm still hoping he gets his numbers up and changes his mind about a trade. I mean he can't want to play for this mess. Can he?

  10. #68
    Flash the leather!
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuckie View Post
    Suarez's natural position is "Hoping the NL gets the DH."
    I'm sure that was tongue in cheek, but it's still unfair. He's clearly still learning the position. But he's certainly got the tools and upside to be an above average defender at third. He needs reps and time.

  11. Likes:

    cincyinco (06-08-2016),RedlegJake (05-26-2016),Ron Madden (05-25-2016)

  12. #69
    Member kpresidente's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,093

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
    Lost me at "Suarez at SS". And even threw in "(his natural position)" to boot.
    For the record, I didn't write it. I wouldn't put Suarez at SS, either, but OTOH he's just as bad at 3B. I'd play Peraza at SS and hope for Blandino at 2B. Suarez could be a utility infielder.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  13. #70
    Member kpresidente's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,093

    Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    Good lord, that's sheer insanity to offer Bruce an extension.
    Not at 3 years $43M. There's basically no risk once you have to look at the alternative use of the money, which in our case means straight into the Williams family pockets. So even if he sucks I, as a fan, break even. The payoff is he plays well, contributes to maybe not having a record setting awful team in the upcoming seasons, and buys time for them to find a real RF of the future which we currently have zip in the system.



    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  14. #71
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Cincy
    Posts
    1,938

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by kpresidente View Post
    Not at 3 years $43M. There's basically no risk once you have to look at the alternative use of the money, which in our case means straight into the Williams family pockets. So even if he sucks I, as a fan, break even. The payoff is he plays well, contributes to maybe not having a record setting awful team in the upcoming seasons, and buys time for them to find a real RF of the future which we currently have zip in the system.



    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Basically nobody cares less about "payflex" than I do, but buying our way out of the bullpen problem with the money and starting Duvall/Billy/Winker should at least be on the table.

  15. Likes:

    REDREAD (05-26-2016)

  16. #72
    Member kpresidente's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,093

    Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by swaisuc View Post
    Basically nobody cares less about "payflex" than I do, but buying our way out of the bullpen problem with the money and starting Duvall/Billy/Winker should at least be on the table.
    Yeah but it doesn't preclude anything with the bullpen. They can still add from the market if they want, after all, the guy isn't saying add payroll, just pay Bruce what he's making now. Mostly I just want a real RF, doesn't have to be Bruce, but that kind of short-term deal is hard to come by. Get Winker in LF, get Duvall to 3B, and get Suarez somewhere else. That's what I like. If you go Duvall in LF, Winker in RF, and Suarez at 3B you just have mediocrity everywhere. Duvall is a nice hitter for a 3B but nothing special for a LF. Winker could be a good hitter but playing out of position I fear he might give back some of that offensive value with the glove. And Suarez gives back all of his offensive value no matter what. I don't want that situation to settle in. With Bruce on a short term deal we get those guys where they can maximize their value and everybody knows we still have a glaring need for a RF of the future. Hopefully you find that guy and Bruce can be seen as a bridge.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Last edited by kpresidente; 05-26-2016 at 09:05 AM.

  17. #73
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rojo View Post
    I'm still hoping he gets his numbers up and changes his mind about a trade. I mean he can't want to play for this mess. Can he?
    I'm pretty sure Phillips knew this year would be a mess.
    I think the odds of him ever approved a trade are zero.. If he wouldn't accept for Dusty/Nats, I can't see him accepting anywhere.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  18. Likes:

    alwaysawarrior (05-26-2016)

  19. #74
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by kpresidente View Post
    Not at 3 years $43M. There's basically no risk once you have to look at the alternative use of the money, which in our case means straight into the Williams family pockets. So even if he sucks I, as a fan, break even. The payoff is he plays well, contributes to maybe not having a record setting awful team in the upcoming seasons, and buys time for them to find a real RF of the future which we currently have zip in the system.
    Cast has shown the willingness to spend money when the team is winning. For example, most people on the board considered Broxton a waste of money, etc, yet Cast was still willing to write the check.

    Yes, this season has been extreme cost cutting, which I did not really agree with. I mean, come on.. they claim they could only sign relievers for 2 million or less..
    But they seem to be buying into the whole new fad of "If you are going to be a non-contender, might as well lose 100 games".

    Anyhow, it's not a good idea to give a guy like Bruce an extension. if nothing else, that money can be used to lock in players as they reach arbitration.
    Eventually the team will spend money again, and I don't want Bruce on the payroll when that happens.

    Also, by your logic, there is no need to extend Bruce, just pick up his option for next year, if you really want him back.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  20. #75
    Daffy Duck RedTeamGo!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    24,087

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuckie View Post
    You know, other than the Votto, Bailey, BP and Mesoraco contracts, the Reds have done a nice job in this area.

    Hey, we have to laugh to keep from crying. (I'm weeping inside though.)
    The BP ltd has been fine. He has barely spent any time on the DL and has been a pretty productive 2b.

    Does the Mesoraco deal count as an ltd? They just bought out his arbitration years and it was only like $50 mil, iirc.

    You are jumping off the Votto ship after two bad months?

    Bailey looks bad, pitchers arms blow up.

  21. Likes:

    REDREAD (05-26-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator