Turn Off Ads?
Page 14 of 67 FirstFirst ... 41011121314151617182464 ... LastLast
Results 196 to 210 of 1003

Thread: Royals interested in Bruce?

  1. #196
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    34,927

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Knightro28 View Post
    People forget that.
    love to see Jay channel his inner PFTCommenter.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  2. Likes:

    *BaseClogger* (06-06-2016),Wonderful Monds (06-06-2016)

  3. #197
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,758

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    Look at the 2015 MLB.com Pipeline top 100 for 2015.

    Peraza is #24.

    Maybe other lists too, but, definitely that one.
    The 2015 list meant entering the 2015 season. There wasn't a prospect list entering the 2016 season that had Peraza as a top-25 overall prospect in baseball. You're saying he was top 25 a year before the trade. Not when the trade was made. Big difference.

    PS: Frazier is now up to 18 HRs on the year; .OPS of .815. Just imagine what the Reds could get for him right now if they hadn't panicked when the Chapman-for-Peraza deal fell through. I can assure everyone of this: The Reds would get more than Peraza and two throw-ins for Frazier if they would have held on to him until the 2016 trade deadline. (And yes, I know Brandon Dixon is having an incredible stretch at Pensacola. But he's a 24-year-old at the Double-A level. Forgive me if I think he'll never be a factor for the Reds and is simply having a hot streak playing against younger competition in most cases.)
    Last edited by Chuckie; 06-06-2016 at 12:07 PM.

  4. #198
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    48,275

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuckie View Post
    The 2015 list meant entering the 2015 season. There wasn't a prospect list entering the 2016 season that had Peraza as a top-25 overall prospect in baseball. You're saying he was top 25 a year before the trade. Not when the trade was made. Big difference.
    Correct. New top 100 lists hadn't been produced yet, but it was obvious at the time of the trade that Peraza would be dropping from his pre-2015 rankings.
    I'm not a system player. I am a system.

  5. #199
    Blowing Up Cannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    631

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    No point crying over spilt milk. The key is not making the same mistake with Bruce as was made with Frazier. Hold out for a good deal or don't move him. Would we have had a better return with Frazier right now? Yeah. Would it also have just been nice to keep Frazier in general? Yeah. However dwelling on it will help us in no way -- the important thing is just that the FO is smart about our transactions moving forward.
    "If I wanted you to understand I would have explained it better."
    - Johan Cruyff, RIP

  6. #200
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
    Several times this year I have wanted to ask if Bruce should have caught or dove for a ball that fell in front of him but I decided to let it go.
    Yea, I agree.
    And honestly.. I will even say this.
    IF Bruce has that mindset, I don't blame him.
    He's not dumb. He knows that this year is a big year for him. Based on what he does this year, he will either get a nice contract in the offseason or he will have to be someone's 4th OF and try to work his way back as a starter, which is hard to do after you've been branded as washed up.
    Bruce knows his offensive numbers will matter more than the defensive ones.
    Why should he risk getting hurt making a diving catch on a 100 loss team?
    IF Bruce is thinking that way, I really don't blame him.
    Why risk reinjuring something and possibly ending his career.

    I can not read Bruce's mind, but my wild guess is that if he was playing for a contender, his defensive effort would improve. And I am not criticizing him for that.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  7. Likes:

    Redeyecat (06-07-2016)

  8. #201
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    I know this much, I'm setting a high price for Bruce if I'm the Reds. If teams wanted Bruce without giving up anything of real note for him, they had their chance and missed out. If someone like Indians want him, the conversation would start with Clint Frazier/Bradley Zimmer. I don't know where the Reds play him, or if he's a guy Cleveland wants to keep, but Jose Ramirez is pretty interesting as well.
    I would be thrilled with Jose Ramirez.
    But I think the time to get him was before this season when he looked like a former top prospect that lost his luster.
    Although maybe Cleveland still had faith in him and he wasn't available.
    Here's a nice update article on him
    http://didthetribewinlastnight.com/b...-one-year-ago/

    I doubt 193 at bats this season changes Bruce's market value significantly (Sadly).
    The Reds couldn't give Bruce away in the spring, even if they ate 8 million of his salary.
    So I don't see a big haul for Bruce, although I hope I am wrong.

    I don't think anything could get the tribe to part with CFraizer or Zimmer.. That's just not the way the Indians work (which I disagree with, this is the year for them to go for it).
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  9. #202
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    So, I'm probably pushing it by asking this, but if some team had a carbon copy of Peraza and Schebler, would you deal Bruce for that package? Anyone?
    YES, in a heartbeat.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  10. #203
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern Maryland
    Posts
    12,874

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Bruce is currently hitting .280/.332/.591 for a .923 OPS. Top 20 OPS in baseball, I think? (just checked - he's 18th in OPS in all of MLB) Given that offense is still at a premium, I hope they are indeed still shopping him, and I hope teams know the asking price should have gone up from what it was over the winter/spring...
    Last edited by membengal; 06-06-2016 at 02:05 PM.

  11. #204
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,367

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Madden View Post
    If you are gonna be disappointed in the return for Bruce why even trade him? Why not go ahead and keep him?
    I think the answer is that expectations have to be lowered.
    I would be thrilled to get another Peraza or Jose Rameriz for Bruce.. Heck, I would be happy with a prospect that is a potential future setup guy, kind of like Masset was when he was a prospect.

    So trading Bruce for another Tim Hummel.. yes, I agree with you.. that is pointless.. But for a guy with a decent change of being a major leaguer, even a backup? I make the deal.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  12. #205
    Blowing Up Cannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    631

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    I think the answer is that expectations have to be lowered.
    I would be thrilled to get another Peraza or Jose Rameriz for Bruce.. Heck, I would be happy with a prospect that is a potential future setup guy, kind of like Masset was when he was a prospect.

    So trading Bruce for another Tim Hummel.. yes, I agree with you.. that is pointless.. But for a guy with a decent change of being a major leaguer, even a backup? I make the deal.
    So you're completely happy with trading Bruce, a proven 30+ HR hitter who, outside of injury seasons, puts up .320+ OBP, averaging 3.7 WAR over 4 seasons and generally good defending in RF, who is under 30, for...someone who might one day be an average or back-up player?

    Insanity.
    "If I wanted you to understand I would have explained it better."
    - Johan Cruyff, RIP

  13. Likes:

    Redeyecat (06-07-2016),Sea Ray (06-06-2016),thatcoolguy_22 (06-09-2016),Tuff Nut (06-06-2016),Wonderful Monds (06-06-2016),_Sir_Charles_ (06-07-2016)

  14. #206
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    23,461

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedTeamGo! View Post
    Dave Cameron just said on Twitter there are no good outfielders on the market. I tweeted him and said Jay Bruce is having a solid season, at least from the power department. He responded by saying "Jay Bruce has been a disaster in the field."

    That is a good point, we may be overselling Bruce's worth right now. Defense is important and Bruce so far this season has been one of the worst fielders in major league baseball statistically. That has to be hurting his value.
    There are 15 teams in the AL that can DH him.

    Are there 15 DH's with better numbers? Are there even 3?
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  15. #207
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    34,927

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    To continue the idea of 'Bruce to Cleveland':

    Jeff Passan
    ‏@JeffPassan
    Source: There is serious concern from Indians that Michael Brantley is going to miss a significant amount of time with his shoulder injury.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  16. Likes:

    BEETTLEBUG (06-06-2016)

  17. #208
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    19,800

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    If Bruce was dealt to Cleveland, what should we expect to be a decent return?
    Empathy is about standing in someone else's shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes. Not only is empathy hard to outsource and automate, but it makes the world a better place.

    -- Daniel H. Pink

  18. #209
    Blowing Up Cannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    631

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by WrongVerb View Post
    If Bruce was dealt to Cleveland, what should we expect to be a decent return?
    Nothing less than one of Zimmer or Frazier, but I would hope they push hard for Frazier. Even if we have to add a bit more on our end.
    "If I wanted you to understand I would have explained it better."
    - Johan Cruyff, RIP

  19. #210
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    692

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I would ask for C Frazier and F Mejia(C)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator