Turn Off Ads?
Page 26 of 67 FirstFirst ... 1622232425262728293036 ... LastLast
Results 376 to 390 of 1003

Thread: Royals interested in Bruce?

  1. #376
    Member corkedbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,046

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post


    Pass me what you're huffing, pal, sounds like some of the good stuff.
    I certainly wasn't talking about now or this year, but I believe Votto will right the ship and sometim in the next couple of years someone might make an offer.

  2. #377
    Member CRDB40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    915

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by corkedbat View Post
    I certainly wasn't talking about now or this year, but I believe Votto will right the ship and sometime in the next couple of years someone might make an offer.
    I don't think that's crazy at all.

    Honestly, I feel that if his contract was less of an obstacle, even for the wealthier teams, he would have been moved already (last offseason or last year's deadline). I don't think it's crazy to think that, if he rebounds to normal "Votto-esque" form, he wouldn't at least be shopped for a higher level prospect package (assuming the Reds kicked in some money).

    I mean, in a few years, do we really expect a 34-35 year old 1B to be the cornerstone of our "rebuild"?

  3. #378
    Bullpen or whatever RedEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    9,297

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by CRDB40 View Post
    I mean, in a few years, do we really expect a 34-35 year old 1B to be the cornerstone of our "rebuild"?
    I hear ya, but I still think Votto's skills will age well. You could do worse than build a young lineup around that sort of OBP and work ethic. Not to mention he's pretty darn funny.
    “Every level he goes to, he is going to compete. They will know who he is at every level he goes to.” -- ED on EDLC

  4. #379
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,240

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Bruce had a similiar stretch last year after his cold April so do not get fooled by him.

  5. #380
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,240

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    From May 16 to July 17 last year Jay hit 306/.384/.543 for .927 ops
    11.4% BB 18.5% K rate

    So I do not believe he has changed.

  6. #381
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    59,914

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by InsaneinthBrame View Post
    Bruce had a similiar stretch last year after his cold April so do not get fooled by him.
    He also had 74 EBH's in 2013 which is 13th best in over 130 seasons of Reds baseball so let's assume he's already fooled us all

  7. Likes:

    Edd Roush (06-09-2016),Fil3232 (06-10-2016),Redeyecat (06-11-2016)

  8. #382
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,240

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    Just for grins here is Bruce's game log for this year. Mostly because I like posting tables.

    DATE OPP RESULT AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO OBP SLG OPS AVG
    4/4/2016 vs PHI W 6-2 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250
    4/6/2016 vs PHI W 3-2 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.375 0.375 0.750 0.375
    4/7/2016 vs PHI W 10-6 4 2 3 0 0 2 5 0 0 0.500 1.000 1.500 0.500
    4/8/2016 vs PIT L 6-5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.438 0.800 1.238 0.400
    4/9/2016 vs PIT W 5-1 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0.400 0.684 1.084 0.368
    4/10/2016 vs PIT W 2-1 4 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.417 0.739 1.156 0.391
    4/11/2016 @ CHC L 5-3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.357 0.630 0.987 0.333
    4/13/2016 @ CHC L 9-2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.313 0.567 0.880 0.300
    4/14/2016 @ CHC L 8-1 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.361 0.606 0.967 0.333
    4/15/2016 @ STL L 14-3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.325 0.541 0.866 0.297
    4/16/2016 @ STL W 9-8 5 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0.333 0.595 0.928 0.310
    4/17/2016 @ STL L 4-3 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.327 0.565 0.892 0.304
    4/18/2016 vs COL L 5-1 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0.321 0.560 0.881 0.300
    4/19/2016 vs COL W 4-3 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.298 0.519 0.817 0.278
    4/20/2016 vs COL W 6-5 4 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0.311 0.569 0.880 0.293
    4/21/2016 vs CHC L 16-0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.313 0.550 0.863 0.283
    4/22/2016 vs CHC L 8-1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.313 0.540 0.853 0.286
    4/23/2016 vs CHC W 13-5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0.324 0.523 0.847 0.277
    4/24/2016 vs CHC L 9-0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.320 0.500 0.820 0.265
    4/29/2016 @ PIT L 4-1 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.316 0.500 0.816 0.264
    4/30/2016 @ PIT L 5-1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.313 0.480 0.793 0.253
    Monthly Totals 75 9 19 3 1 4 15 5 17 0.313 0.480 0.793 0.253
    5/1/2016 @ PIT W 6-5 3 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 0.322 0.487 0.809 0.256
    5/2/2016 vs SF L 9-6 4 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.319 0.500 0.819 0.256
    5/3/2016 vs SF L 3-1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.305 0.477 0.782 0.244
    5/4/2016 vs SF W 7-4 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0.303 0.478 0.781 0.244
    5/5/2016 vs MIL W 9-5 4 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 2 0.301 0.500 0.801 0.245
    5/6/2016 vs MIL W 5-1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.299 0.490 0.789 0.245
    5/7/2016 vs MIL L 13-7 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0.295 0.485 0.780 0.243
    5/8/2016 vs MIL L 5-4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.284 0.467 0.751 0.234
    5/9/2016 vs PIT W 3-2 Did not play
    5/11/2016 vs PIT L 5-4 4 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0.292 0.495 0.787 0.243
    5/13/2016 @ PHI L 3-2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.285 0.482 0.767 0.237
    5/14/2016 @ PHI L 4-3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.291 0.479 0.770 0.239
    5/15/2016 @ PHI W 9-4 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 0.318 0.500 0.818 0.258
    5/16/2016 @ CLE L 15-6 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0.324 0.500 0.824 0.266
    5/17/2016 @ CLE L 13-1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.331 0.504 0.835 0.276
    5/18/2016 vs CLE L 8-7 4 3 3 0 0 2 2 1 0 0.347 0.557 0.904 0.290
    5/19/2016 vs CLE L 7-2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.338 0.541 0.879 0.281
    5/20/2016 vs SEA L 8-3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.329 0.525 0.854 0.273
    5/21/2016 vs SEA L 4-0 Did not play
    5/22/2016 vs SEA L 5-4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.327 0.518 0.845 0.270
    5/23/2016 @ LAD L 1-0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.321 0.507 0.828 0.264
    5/24/2016 @ LAD L 8-2 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.319 0.507 0.826 0.264
    5/25/2016 @ LAD L 3-1 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.317 0.513 0.830 0.263
    5/27/2016 @ MIL L 9-5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.310 0.500 0.810 0.256
    5/28/2016 @ MIL W 7-6 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0.313 0.497 0.810 0.261
    5/29/2016 @ MIL L 5-4 3 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.317 0.512 0.829 0.262
    5/30/2016 @ COL W 11-8 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.314 0.509 0.823 0.260
    5/31/2016 @ COL L 17-4 4 1 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 0.323 0.549 0.872 0.272
    Monthly Totals 98 19 28 7 3 6 18 7 25 0.330 0.602 0.932 0.286
    6/1/2016 @ COL W 7-2 4 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0.321 0.559 0.880 0.271
    6/2/2016 @ COL W 11-4 5 1 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 0.323 0.571 0.894 0.275
    6/3/2016 vs WSH W 7-2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.317 0.559 0.876 0.269
    6/4/2016 vs WSH W 6-3 4 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0.325 0.579 0.904 0.279
    6/5/2016 vs WSH L 10-9 3 2 1 0 0 1 3 2 1 0.332 0.591 0.923 0.280
    6/7/2016 vs STL W 7-6 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.330 0.584 0.914 0.279
    Monthly Totals 24 7 8 1 1 3 7 2 3 0.385 0.833 1.218 0.333
    AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO OBP SLG OPS AVG
    Totals 197 35 55 11 5 13 40 14 45 0.330 0.584 0.914 0.279

    Seems fairly consistent. A few cool streaks, a few warm ones too.
    I think hitting .200 with a .260 OBP .400 slg from April 8 to May 8th is kind of cold for me
    May 9 to now .340 ba .388 obp .723 slg seems kind of hot
    That too me is not consistent

  9. #383
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,240

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    2013 is not today Bruce that is prime Bruce.

    Bruce has history of hot and cold and it is the same today with a player that has aged. 29 is not 26 especially after injuries.

  10. #384
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    42,664

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by BluegrassRedleg View Post
    He's a guy that needs to quit throwing at people intentionally. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Fantastic talent.
    Sounds like someone we could use against PIT.
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  11. Likes:

    androosh (06-09-2016)

  12. #385
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    689

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    Sounds like someone we could use against PIT.
    I wonder if just turning and throwing at Hurdle would end things once and for all

  13. #386
    Blowing Up Cannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    631

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Probably doesn't mean anything, but I wonder if with the addition of Benson, and having Zimmer that the Indians would be willing to send us Frazier in some kind of deal involving Bruce.
    "If I wanted you to understand I would have explained it better."
    - Johan Cruyff, RIP

  14. #387
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    13,838

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cannon View Post
    Probably doesn't mean anything, but I wonder if with the addition of Benson, and having Zimmer that the Indians would be willing to send us Frazier in some kind of deal involving Bruce.
    Was thinking the exact same thing. Along with Bruce, I'd offer Cleveland their choice of anyone in Pensacola, Daytona or Dayton, with the exception of Garrett. I'd also give them their choice of sending us Zimmer or Frazier.
    Go BLUE!!!

  15. #388
    Knowledge Is Good Big Klu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Cambridge, OH
    Posts
    30,967

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    A few days ago, I was watching Drennan Live (a Cleveland-centric sports talk show) on Sportstime Ohio (FSOhio's sister network in NE Ohio), and host Bruce Drennan was talking to Dave Wallace, the manager of Cleveland's AA affiliate in Akron. Suffice it to say that the Tribe are extremely high on both Zimmer and Frazier, and neither of them are going anywhere. (Except possibly on the fast track up I-77 from Akron to Cleveland.)
    Eric Stratton, Rush Chairman. Damn glad to meet ya.

  16. #389
    Member corkedbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,046

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I wouldn't even mind Tyler Naquin either.

  17. #390
    Member WVRedsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Rainelle, WV
    Posts
    10,325

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Trade. A few years ago, everyone wanted to trade Votto. Now, it's Bruce, Homer, Phillips, and Cozart. When will be satisfied? Apparently, RedsZone is never satisfied. When players are cheap, you keep them until they are no longer cheap and then you move them. Occasionally, you give a long term deal to a player who is special and then the fanbase gripes forever when they don't hit .400 and walk a lot and hit home runs and visit the sick children in the hospital. Just seems strange when anyone is successful, the trade talk starts. When they get the long term contract, everyone is looking for that great prospect that is going to save us. WE all worry about how much money the franchise is spending. It's not my money, so I don't care. The result is what we have now. Failure. Humor me. I really just want to win and winning without the players mentioned is near to impossible.
    www.ris-news.com
    "You only have to bat a thousand in two things; flying and heart transplants. Everything else you can go 4-for-5."
    -Beano Cook

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator