Turn Off Ads?
Page 39 of 67 FirstFirst ... 2935363738394041424349 ... LastLast
Results 571 to 585 of 1003

Thread: Royals interested in Bruce?

  1. #571
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,240

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Well this is new and different. I am use to Bruce discussions hijacking threads. Here is a Votto discussion hijacking a bruce thread. Irony

  2. Likes:

    dubc47834 (06-20-2016),REDREAD (06-20-2016)

  3. #572
    Probably not Patrick Bateman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    8,785

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghosts of 1990 View Post
    I think its great you think his .810 OPS is stellar. Since we aren't allowed to mention when he isnt a run producer. His 0.9 bWAR may catch his 1.4 bWAR from 2014 at this rate!!!
    You really want to go down swinging on the notion that Votto is an .800 OPS man? I'd keep those thoughts in your head with your other voices.

  4. #573
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghosts of 1990 View Post
    I think its great you think his .810 OPS is stellar. Since we aren't allowed to mention when he isnt a run producer. His 0.9 bWAR may catch his 1.4 bWAR from 2014 at this rate!!!
    Did I say a 810 OPS is "stellar"? I was asking if you, after a few days of reflection, still think Votto is "cooked"?

    I'm also asking if you would care to give a prediction on where you think he winds up. I'm really not sure where cooked" lies on the player spectrum.
    Last edited by Raisor; 06-20-2016 at 11:14 AM.

  5. #574
    Blowing Up Cannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    631

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    I don't know how you can be a fan of the Reds but not a fan of Votto.
    "If I wanted you to understand I would have explained it better."
    - Johan Cruyff, RIP

  6. #575
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    N/m

  7. #576
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    23,465

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
    "Sure thing, man."

    - Pablo Sandoval's belt
    Panda is the norm?

    Votto in June:
    .338 .482 .508 .990

    And to keep it on topic, Bruce in June:
    .279 .338 .618 .955
    Last edited by TRF; 06-20-2016 at 12:25 PM.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  8. Likes:

    '69 (06-20-2016),Wonderful Monds (06-20-2016)

  9. #577
    Blowing Up Cannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    631

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Also despite continuing to be red hot at the plate, and some of the very nice catches he's made of late, his defensive value combines to make him worth exactly 0 WAR so far this season, supposedly.
    "If I wanted you to understand I would have explained it better."
    - Johan Cruyff, RIP

  10. #578
    Member Beatlessp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    259

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    i'm still learning about the defensive metrics, so forgive the question: Does Jay get penalized on UZR if Hamilton makes a play on a ball that is in Jay's "zone"?

  11. Likes:

    mbgrayson (06-21-2016)

  12. #579
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beatlessp View Post
    i'm still learning about the defensive metrics, so forgive the question: Does Jay get penalized on UZR if Hamilton makes a play on a ball that is in Jay's "zone"?
    Yes and no.

    He doesn't get it counted as a play not made that should have been. So he gets 0 out of 0 for it. But, had he made it, he would have gotten 1 out of 1, which would have improved his overall zone rating because it would then be a higher percentage of plays made. How many of those happen per season? I honestly don't know. Is it 10? Is it 30?

    The value of the plays also comes into play. Was the play "out of the zone"? If so, it's worth significantly more than a play made "in the zone".

  13. Likes:

    Redeyecat (06-21-2016)

  14. #580
    I wear Elly colored glass WrongVerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    19,802

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Why do the Cardinals pretty consistently ignore defense entirely in favor of offense, and win way more than the Reds?
    Empathy is about standing in someone else's shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes. Not only is empathy hard to outsource and automate, but it makes the world a better place.

    -- Daniel H. Pink

  15. Likes:

    Wonderful Monds (06-20-2016)

  16. #581
    Member kaldaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,852

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    Yes and no.

    He doesn't get it counted as a play not made that should have been. So he gets 0 out of 0 for it. But, had he made it, he would have gotten 1 out of 1, which would have improved his overall zone rating because it would then be a higher percentage of plays made. How many of those happen per season? I honestly don't know. Is it 10? Is it 30?

    The value of the plays also comes into play. Was the play "out of the zone"? If so, it's worth significantly more than a play made "in the zone".
    Which opens a can of worms...would Jay have caught it? How do we know?

  17. #582
    rest in power, king Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    11,658

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    Panda is the norm?

    Votto in June:
    .338 .482 .508 .990

    And to keep it on topic, Bruce in June:
    .279 .338 .618 .955
    I just really wanted to make a joke at Panda's expense.


  18. #583
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    23,465

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
    I just really wanted to make a joke at Panda's expense.

    I'm down.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  19. #584
    rest in power, king Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    11,658

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by WrongVerb View Post
    Why do the Cardinals pretty consistently ignore defense entirely in favor of offense, and win way more than the Reds?
    I do wonder how capable a Reds lineup like this could be...

    C (whoever)
    1B Votto
    2B Phillips/Suarez (when Phillips leaves)
    SS Peraza
    3B Duvall
    LF Winker
    CF Hamilton
    RF Bruce/Schebler (if Bruce is not retained)

    ...could be.

    If Senzel develops quickly, I wonder even if he could play some 2B for awhile like the Cards did with Matt Carpenter. Make Suarez a supersub in that scenario, I think he's even more valuable.

    Just spitballing

  20. Likes:

    WrongVerb (06-20-2016)

  21. #585
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    62,259

    Re: Royals interested in Bruce?

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    Panda is the norm?

    Votto in June:
    .338 .482 .508 .990

    And to keep it on topic, Bruce in June:
    .279 .338 .618 .955
    Wrong numbers, it's all about the traditional stats

    Votto 2 HR and 6 RBI
    Bruce 5 HR and 18 RBI
    Go Gators!

  22. Likes:

    TRF (06-21-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | The Operator